UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant [X]
x

Filed by a party other than the Registrant [ ]
¨

Check the appropriate box:
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[   ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
[   ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ] Definitive Additional Materials
[   ]

xPreliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
¨Definitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X] No fee required
[   ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

xNo fee required
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
  
N/A
 
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
  
 N/A

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

  
 N/A

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
  
N/A
 
(5)Total fee paid:
  
 N/A

1


[   ] ¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[   ]

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)Amount Previously Paid:
  
N/A
 
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
  
 N/A
(3)Filing Party:
  
N/A
 
(4)Date Filed:
  
 N/A

2


NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL AND SPECIAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on <>, 2014TO BE HELD ON MAY 13, 2019

- and -

PROXY STATEMENT AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

with respect to the proposed joint venture to develop and operate the
Soledad Mountain Project

 

WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED SALE BY THE CORPORATION

OF GOLDEN QUEEN MINING HOLDINGS, INC.

GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.

CORPORATE OFFICE
6411 Imperial Avenue,

2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street

Vancouver,
British Columbia Canada, V7W 2J5
(604) 921-7570V6E 3X2

These materials are important and require your immediate attention. If you have questions or require assistance
with voting your shares, you may contact Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.’s proxy solicitation agent:
Laurel Hill Advisory Group
North American Toll-Free Number: 1-877-452-7184
Banks, Brokers or Collect Calls Outside North America: 416-304-0211
Email: assistance@laurelhill.com

These materials are important and require your immediate attention. If you have questions or require assistance with voting your shares, you may contact Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.’s proxy solicitation agent:

Laurel Hill Advisory Group

North American Toll-Free Number: 1-877-452-7184

Collect Calls Outside North America: 416-304-0211

Email: assistance@laurelhill.com 

The accompanying proxy statement and management information circular is first being mailed to shareholders of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. on or about April [♦], 2019.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.


LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

<>

April [♦], 20142019

Dear shareholders of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (“Golden Queen” or the “Company”):

The board of directors of Golden Queen (the “Board”) cordially invites you to attend the annual general and special meeting (the “Meeting”) of holders of common shares (the “Shares”) to be held at #2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia at on May 13, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Standard Time) on <>, 2014 at <>. At the Meeting, shareholdersyou will be asked to approve a proposed transaction involving the proposed joint venture with Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) as describedsale of 100% of the Company’s 50% ownership interest in the accompanying Proxy Statement (the “Joint Venture”) to develop and operate Golden Queen’s Soledad Mountain Project (the “Soledad Project”“Transaction”). The Soledad Mountain Project is Golden Queen’s primary asset, and its sale represents the sale of all or substantially all of Golden Queen’s assets.

The Transaction

Pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated February 7, 2019, the Joint Venture, Gauss will contribute US$110,000,000 in cashCompany agreed to sell 100% of the Soledad Project in exchange forshares of its subsidiary Golden Queen Mining Holdings Inc., which currently owns 50% of the outstanding units of Golden Queen Mining, LLC, to a 50% interest in the Soledad Project. The membersgroup of Gauss have further committed to fund up to an additional US$40,000,000 to the Soledad Project, which will also be used to develop and operate the Soledad Project.

The Soledad Project is a fully-permitted, open pit, heap leach gold and silver project located just outside the town of Mojave in Kern County, California. The Soledad Project will use conventional open pit mining methods and the cyanide heap leach and Merrill-Crowe processes to recover gold and silver from crushed, agglomerated ore. Construction is underway on site and commissioning is planned for 2015.

Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia National Corporation (“Leucadia”)purchasers including Thomas M. Clay and certain members of the Clay family that collectively own approximately 27%and associated entities (collectively, the “Purchasers”). Golden Queen Mining, LLC owns and operates the Soledad Mountain Project located in Kern County, California.

The consideration from the Purchasers is comprised of (i) US$4.25 million in cash; (ii) the extinguishment of all amounts owing to the Purchasers by the Company under a loan agreement (approximately US$26.6 million as of February 7, 2019); and (iii) the cancellation of all of the Purchasers’ ownership interest in the Company (consisting of 177,701,229 Shares, of Golden Queen (the “Clay Group”)457,500 options and 18,000,000 share purchase warrants). Gauss will be owned 67.5% by Gauss Holdings LLC (“Gauss Holdings”, Leucadia’s investment entity) and 32.5% by Auvergne LLC (“Auvergne”, the Clay Group’s investment entity).

In addition, to the significant cash contributions to fund the continued development of the Soledad Project, management of Golden Queen believes that the Joint Venture will have the following benefits for Golden Queen and its shareholders:

Pursuant to section 501(c) of the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) Company Manual, for the Joint Venture to proceed, it must be approved by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders of Golden Queen voting in person or by proxy at the Meeting, excluding those votes in respect of Shares held by the Clay Group and associates and affiliates of the Clay Group. The Joint Venture is subject to certain other customary conditions, including receipt of TSX approval. Closing of the Joint Venture is expected to occur approximately 3 business days after these conditions have been satisfied.

The Board appointed a special committee of independent directors (the “Special Committee”) to consider the Joint Venture. The Special Committee carefully considered all aspects of the Joint Venture and the alternatives available to Golden Queen to finance the Soledad Project. As part of its review of the Joint Venture, the Special Committee engaged Maxit Capital LP (“Maxit Capital”) as its financial advisor, which prepared an independent formal valuation report (the “Valuation”) and an opinion on the fairness of the Joint Venture from a financial point of viewcontingent payment to the Company (the “Fairness Opinion”). Basedif the Soledad Mountain Project is subsequently sold or transferred to a third party in certain circumstances.

The consideration offered by the Purchasers totals approximately US$37.2 million (excluding the contingent payment), based on the above,volume-weighted average price of the Special Committee unanimously recommended thatCompany’s Shares on the Board approveOTCQX Best Market for the Joint Venture.20 trading days ended February 7, 2019, and including the principal and accrued interest payable to the Purchasers pursuant to the loans to be extinguished.

The Board, on the recommendation of the Special Committee,special committee, composed of independent directors of the Board (the “Special Committee”), and based upon its own investigations, has concludedunanimously determined that the Joint VentureTransaction is in the best interests of Golden Queen. The BoardQueen and the shareholders of Golden Queen (excluding the Purchasers) and recommends that the shareholders vote FOR the Joint Venture.

A summaryholders of the Joint Venture, noticeShares vote to approve the Transaction.

Reasons for the Transaction

Despite the extensive efforts of special meeting,our management and the Board, operations at the Soledad Mountain Project have not generated sufficient free cash flow to award dividends to Golden Queen and may require significant additional cash to continue. Golden Queen has been unable to attract sufficient capital to fund its own operations and GQM LLC, other than through loans and investment from members of the Clay family. Payments due under such loans have been extended until after the Meeting but are coming due in the near future.

The benefits of the Transaction to shareholders include, but are not limited to:

·Resolves going concern issue and the possibility of entering into bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings by eliminating all outstanding debt payable by Golden Queen, including the scheduled debt repayment that was due on February 8, 2019, and additional payments due in April and May of 2019.
·Provides certainty of value and value that is more favorable than the value that might have been received by pursuing other business opportunities.
·Eliminates the Clay’s majority ownership position, materially increasing the retained ownership by remaining shareholders.
·Provides a meaningful cash treasury to assess various options to provide or return value to shareholders.
·Decreases administrative expenses for Golden Queen following closing of the Transaction.

We recommend that you review in detail the potential benefits and risks associated with the Transaction which are set out in the attached proxy statement and management information circular (“Proxy Statement”) under “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Reasons for the Transaction” and “Risk Factors”.

Shareholder Vote

At the Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote on a special resolution approving the Transaction (the “Transaction Resolution”), the full text of which is set out in the attached Proxy Statement. The Transaction constitutes the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Golden Queen and is a related party transaction. Golden Queen has determined that the Transaction Resolution must be approved by (a) ⅔ of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution, and (b) a simple majority of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution by the shareholders of Golden Queen, excluding votes cast by shareholders that are required to be excluded pursuant to applicable securities laws and the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange. The votes attached to an aggregate of 177,701,229 Shares (representing approximately 59.2% of the issued and outstanding Shares) owned by the Purchasers will be excluded from voting in determining whether the Transaction has been approved by the minority shareholders of Golden Queen. We recommend you review “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project” in the attached Proxy Statement for additional details.

At the Meeting, you will also be asked to consider and vote on a special resolution approving a consolidation (the “Consolidation Resolution”) of Golden Queen’s common shares on the basis of ten existing Shares for each one post-consolidation common share (the “Consolidation”). The Board believes it is in the best interest of Golden Queen to reduce the number of outstanding Shares, making Golden Queen more attractive to investors in potential future financings and transactions that may follow the Transaction. The Consolidation Resolution must be approved by ⅔ of the votes cast on the Consolidation Resolution. Management intends to proceed with the Consolidation on completion of the Transaction, but completion of the Transaction is not contingent on the approval of the Consolidation Resolution. We recommend you review “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 2: Share Consolidation” in the attached Proxy Statement for additional details.

At the Meeting you will also be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, certain compensation that will or may be paid or become payable to our named executive officers under existing employment agreements, including in connection with the proposed Transaction (the “Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution”) and the frequency of a say-on-pay vote (the “Advisory Vote on Say-on-Pay”). The Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution requires approval of a simple majority of the votes cast on the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution. We recommend you review “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” and “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 4: Advisory Vote on Say-on-Pay Frequency” in the attached Proxy Statement for additional details.

Finally, you will also be asked to vote on annual general meeting matters, including the election of directors, appointment of auditors and approval of a stock option plan. See these items under “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting” of the attached Proxy Statement for additional details.

A notice of meeting, Proxy Statement, and a proxy (“Proxy”) or voting instruction form (“VIF”) are included with this letter. The summary provides you with an overview of the transaction, with answers to some commonly asked questions. The Proxy Statement contains aprovides detailed description ofinformation about the Joint VentureTransaction Resolution, Consolidation Resolution and other information to assist you in considering the matters to be voted upon.Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution. We encourage you to carefully consider the information in this Proxy Statement, and to consult your financial, legal or other professional advisors if you require assistance.

- i -


ii 

Special Committee and Board Recommendation

The Board appointed the Special Committee to evaluate the Transaction as well as explore potential alternatives to the Transaction. In recommending that the Company enter into the Transaction, the Special Committee carefully considered all aspects of the Transaction, considered strategic alternatives and appointed legal and financial advisors to assist in the evaluation process. The Special Committee received a confidential preliminary valuation and fairness opinion (the “Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing by a formal valuation and fairness opinion (the “Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion”), from Ernst & Young LLP. The Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion provided a valuation of Golden Queen and concluded, subject to certain assumptions, limitations and qualifications, that the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the shareholders, other than the Purchasers.

After careful consideration of the Company’s financial condition and debt obligations, the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, and the lack of strategic alternatives, the Special Committee recommended that the Board approve the Transaction on the basis that it is in the best interests of the Company and the shareholders of the Company (excluding the Purchasers).The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders of the Company vote FOR the Transaction Resolution, Consolidation Resolution and Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution at the Meeting and FOR the option of “3 Years” as the preferred frequency on Say-on-Pay Votes.

Vote Your Shares Today

Your vote is important, regardless of the number of Golden Queen Shares you own. If you are a registered shareholder, meaning that your name appears on the records of Golden Queen as the registered holder of Sharescommon shares (a “Registered Shareholder”), you may wish to vote by proxy whether or not you attend the Meeting in person. Registered Shareholders electing to submit a proxy may do so by completing the enclosed Proxy and returning it to the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services Inc. (“Computershare”), in accordance with the instructions on the Proxy. You should ensure that the Proxy is received by Computershare at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the Meeting or the adjournment thereof at which the Proxy is to be used.

If you are a non-registered or beneficial shareholder, meaning your Shares are not registered in your own name but are registered in the name of a broker, bank or other intermediary (a “Beneficial Shareholder”), follow the instructions provided by your broker or other intermediary to vote your Shares.common shares. You may also consult the section in the Proxy Statement entitled “ProxyGeneral Proxy Information – Proxy Voting – Beneficial Shareholders”Shareholders for more detailed information.

Shareholder Questions

If you have any questions about the Transaction or Consolidation, please contact Brenda Dayton, Corporate Secretary, by telephone at 1-778-373-1557, or by email at info@goldenqueen.com. If you need assistance with the completion and delivery of your Proxy or VIF, please contact Laurel Hill Advisory Group, our proxy solicitation agent, by telephone at 1-877-452-7184, or by email at assistance@laurelhill.com.

On behalf of Golden Queen, I would like to thank all our shareholders for their ongoing support. We are committed to the success of this Joint Venture and believe it will put Golden Queen in a better position to meet the evolving needs of our business and shareholders.

Yours truly,

 

H. Lutz Klingmann
President, CEOPaul Blythe

Chairman of Special Committee

The enclosed Proxy Statement is dated April [♦], 2019 and Director
is expected to be first sent or given to shareholders of Golden Queen on or about April [♦], 2019.

- ii -


iii 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD AT 10:00 A.M. ON<>, 2014

The Special Meeting of Shareholders

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual general and special meeting (the “Meeting”) of the shareholders (the “Shareholders”) of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (the “Company” or “Golden Queen”) will be held at #2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C. on May 13, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Standard Time) on <>, 2014 at <>, for the following purposes:

1.

to consider and, if thought fit, for disinterested shareholdersadvisable, to pass, an ordinarya special resolution approving(the “Transaction Resolution”) to approve the Joint Venture to develop and operatesale of 100% of the shares of Golden Queen Mining Holdings Inc., which currently holds a 50% ownership interest in the Soledad Mountain Project, pursuant to the terms of an agreement for the purchase of shares dated February 7, 2019 (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) between the Company and the Purchasers (as defined in the accompanying proxy statement and management information circular (“Proxy Statement”)) that, for corporate law purposes, constitutes the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, as described in the accompanying Proxy Statement;

2.to consider and, if deemed advisable, to pass a special resolution (the “Consolidation Resolution”) to approve the consolidation of the capital of the Company on the basis of ten (10) existing common shares for each one (1) post-consolidation common share, as more particularly described in the attachedaccompanying Proxy Statement; and

2.

to transact any other business which may properly come before the Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

3.to consider and, if thought advisable, to pass, a resolution (the “Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution”) to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, certain executive compensation, including compensation that will or may be paid or become payable to our named executive officers under existing employment agreements in connection with the Transaction;

4.to hold an advisory and non-binding vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes;

5.to receive the financial statements of the Company for its financial year ended December 31, 2018 together with the report of the independent auditors thereon;

6.to set the number of directors at three (3) and to elect directors to serve until the next annual general meeting of Shareholders or until their respective successors are elected or appointed;

7.to re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the financial year ending December 31, 2019, and to authorize the directors to fix the auditors’ remuneration; and

8.to consider, and, if thought advisable, to pass a resolution to approve the Company’s stock option plan as more particularly described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

The specific details of the matters proposed to be put before the Meeting are set forth in the Proxy Statement accompanying and forming part of this Notice. The full text of the Transaction Resolution, Consolidation Resolution and Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution and the proposal for frequency on future Say-on-Pay votes are set forth in “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting” of the accompanying Proxy Statement.

The Board has fixed <>, 2014,April 3, 2019, as the record date for determining shareholdersShareholders entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only shareholdersShareholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting.

All Registeredregistered Shareholders are invited to attend the Meeting in person, but even if you expect to be present at the Meeting, you are requested to mark, sign, date and return the enclosed Proxy or VIFform of proxy (“Proxy”) as promptly as possible as directed on the form to ensure your representation. Beneficial Shareholders must complete the enclosed VIFvoter information form (“VIF”) and return it as directed on the VIF to ensure your representation.All proxiesProxies must be received by our transfer agent not less than forty-eight (48) hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays,before the time of the Meeting in order to be counted. All VIFs must be returned as directed and within the time specified on the VIF in order to be counted.

Registered shareholders attending the Meeting may vote in person even if they have previously voted by proxy.Proxy.


Registered Shareholders have the right to dissent with respect to the Transaction Resolution, as more particularly described in the accompanying Proxy Statement. Those registered Shareholders who validly exercise dissent rights will be entitled to be paid fair value of their common shares. In order to validly exercise dissent rights, registered shareholders must strictly comply with the dissent procedures as set out in Sections 237 to 247 of theBusiness Corporations Act(British Columbia). See “Dissent Rights” in the attached Proxy Statement.

If you have any questions or need assistance with the completion and delivery of your Proxy or VIF, please contact Laurel Hill Advisory Group, our proxy solicitation agent, by telephone at 1-877-452-7184, or by email at assistance@laurelhill.com.

Dated at Vancouver, British Columbia, this <>[♦] day of <>, 2014.April, 2019.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
By:/s/ Paul M. Blythe
Paul M. Blythe, Director

____________________________
H. Lutz Klingmann
President, CEO and Director


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for

the Company’s Annual General and Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held on<>, 2014.
May 13, 2019.

The Company’s Proxy Statement is available online atwww.goldenqueen.com

 2

These proxy materials are being sent to both registered and non-registered shareholders. If you are a non-registered shareholder (a Beneficial Shareholder), and the Company or its agent has sent these materials directly to you, your name and address and information about your holdings of securities have been obtained in accordance with applicable securities regulatory requirements from the intermediary holding on your behalf. By choosing to send these materials to you directly, the Company (and not the intermediary holding on your behalf) has assumed responsibility for (i) delivering these materials to you, and (ii) executing your proper voting instructions. Please return your voting instructions as specified in the request for voting instructions.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL1
SUMMARY2
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS7
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING DISCLOSURE10
INFORMATION FOR U.S. SECURITYHOLDERS11
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS11
GENERAL PROXY INFORMATION12
VOTING PROCEDURE14
INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON15
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES16
PRIOR SALES17
DIVIDEND RECORD AND POLICY18
TRADING PRICE AND VOLUME18
MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON AT THE MEETING19
PROPOSAL 1: SALE OF THE SOLEDAD MOUNTAIN PROJECT19
Background to the Transaction20
Terms of the Transaction23
Effect of the Transaction25
Reasons for the Transaction25
Recommendation of the Special Committee28
Recommendation of the Board28
Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion28
Tax Consequences31
Shareholder Approval31
Dissent Rights32
PROPOSAL 2: SHARE CONSOLIDATION33
Effect of the Consolidation34
Procedure for Consolidation34
Shareholder Approval34
Dissent Rights35
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION35
PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF HOLDING THE SAY ON PAY VOTE36
PROPOSAL 5: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS36
PROPOSAL 6: APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS39
PROPOSAL 7: APPROVAL OF STOCK OPTION PLAN39
RISK FACTORS41
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS43

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG DIRECTORS OR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS44
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE44
DIRECTORS COMPENSATION44
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION44
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS46
REPORT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE48
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS51
AUDIT COMMITTEE52
INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS53
INTEREST OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS54
MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS54
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS54
“HOUSEHOLDING” OF PROXY MATERIALS55
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS55
OTHER MATTERS55
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION55
OTHER MATERIAL FACTS55
MISCELLANEOUS55
CERTIFICATE56
SCHEDULE AA-1
SCHEDULE BB-1

GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
6411 Imperial Avenue
#2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, British Columbia, V7W 2J5
V6E 3X2

PROXY STATEMENT
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
<>,2014

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL GENERAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 13, 2019

GENERAL

This management information circular and proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”), including all schedules and appendices hereto, is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by or on behalf of management of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (the “Company” or “Golden Queen”), a British Columbia corporation, for use at the annual general and special meeting of the shareholders (the “Meeting”) of Golden Queen to be held at #2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 3X2, Canada on May 13, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time), and at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof.

In this Proxy Statement, all references to “US$” are references to United States dollars and all references to “C$” are references to Canadian dollars. As at<> April [♦], 2014,2019, one Canadian dollar was equal to approximately US$<>.

GENERAL

The enclosed proxy is solicited[♦], based on the noon rate published by the BoardBank of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd., a British Columbia corporation, for use at the Special Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of Golden Queen to be held at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Standard Time) on <>, 2014, at <>, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.Canada.

In this Proxy Statement, “Shares” means the common shares in the capital of the Company as constituted on the date hereof, “Shareholders” means the holders of Shares, “Registered Shareholders” means shareholders whose names appear on the records of the Company as the registered holders of Shares.Shares, and “Beneficial Shareholders” means shareholders who do not hold Shares in their own name, as further explained under “ProxyGeneral Proxy Information – Proxy Voting – Beneficial Shareholders”Shareholders below.

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being mailed to our shareholdersShareholders on or about <>April [♦], 2014.2019. The Company is sending proxy-related materials directly to Registered Shareholders as well as non-objecting Beneficial Shareholders under NI 54-101. Management of the Company alsoand intends to pay for intermediaries to forward the proxy-related materials to non-objecting and objecting Beneficial Shareholders under NI 54-101.National Instrument 54-101 and Rule 14a-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

It is expected that the solicitation of proxies will be made primarily by mail, but proxies may also be solicited personally or by telephone or email by certain of the Company’s directors, officers and regular employees, who will not receive additional compensation for such solicitation. In addition, the Company will reimburse brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to Beneficial Shareholders. The Company has engaged Laurel Hill Advisory Group to assist in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the Meeting. The Company has agreed to pay Laurel Hill Advisory Group a fee of C$25,00040,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses to solicit proxies. ThisHalf of this cost of solicitation will be paid by the Company.Company and half by the Purchasers (as defined below).

Our administrative offices are located at 6411 Imperial Avenue,#2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V7W 2J5.BC, V6E 3X2.


SUMMARY

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following questions and answers are intended to assist Golden Queen shareholderssummary should be read in making a decision on how to vote at the Meeting. You are urged to read the entire Proxy Statement and the enclosed Proxy carefully, as the information below is a summary only, is not complete,conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

1.              Why am I receivingStatement, including the Schedules attached hereto. The full text of the Share Purchase Agreement (as defined below) may be viewed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and SEDAR at www.sedar.com under the filings made by Golden Queen. Shareholders may also request a copy of the Share Purchase Agreement from Golden Queen free of charge. See the section of this Proxy Statement?Statement entitled “Additional Information”.

The Transaction

Pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated February 7, 2019 (the “Share Purchase Agreement”), the Company agreed to sell 100% of the shares of Golden Queen Mining Holdings Inc. (“GQM US”) to a group of purchasers including Thomas M. Clay and certain members of the Clay family and associated entities (collectively, the “Purchasers”). GQM US currently holds a 50% interest in Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC (“GQM LLC”), the owner of a 100% interest in the Soledad Mountain Project, located at Soledad Mountain, Mojave Mining District, Kern County, California. The 50% interest of GQM US in GQM LLC is subject to potential dilution as a result of warrants of GQM LLC held by Gauss, LLC, which warrants are described under “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Background to the Transaction”. The Soledad Mountain Project is Golden Queen’s primary asset, and its sale represents the sale of all or substantially all of Golden Queen’s assets.

Under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement, the purchase price is comprised of (i) US$4.25 million in cash; (ii) the extinguishment of all amounts owing to the Purchasers by the Company under a loan agreement (approximately US$26.6 million as of February 7, 2019); and (iii) the cancellation of all the Purchasers’ ownership interest in the Company (consisting of 177,701,229 Shares, 457,500 options and 18,000,000 share purchase warrants). In addition, the Purchasers may pay a contingent payment to the Company if the Soledad Mountain Project is subsequently sold or transferred to a third party in certain circumstances.

The consideration offered by the Purchasers totals approximately US$37.2 million (excluding the contingent payment), based on the volume-weighted average price of the Shares on the OTCQX Best Market for the 20 trading days ended February 7, 2019, and including the principal and accrued interest payable to the Purchasers pursuant to the loans to be extinguished.

See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Terms of the Transaction”.

Purpose of the Meeting

The purpose of the Meeting is for Shareholders to consider and vote on:

1.a special resolution approving the Transaction (the “Transaction Resolution”);

2.a special resolution approving the consolidation of the capital of the Company on the basis of ten (10) existing Shares for each one (1) Post-Consolidation Share (the “Consolidation Resolution”);

3.a resolution approving, on an advisory and non-binding basis, certain compensation arrangements with our named executive officers, including under existing employment agreements (the “Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution��);

4.to hold an advisory and non-binding vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes;

5.setting the number of directors at three (3) and electing directors to serve until the next annual general meeting, or until their respective successors are elected or appointed;

6.re-appointing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the financial year ending December 31, 2019, and authorizing the directors to fix the auditors’ remuneration; and


7.a resolution approving the Company’s stock option plan.

The full text of these resolutions are set out in “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting” of this Proxy Statement.

The Transaction constitutes the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Golden Queen to related parties of Golden Queen, and requires approval of the Shareholders in accordance with the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (“BCBCA”), Multilateral Instrument 61-101 –Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions(“MI 61-101”) and section 501(c) of the TSXToronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) Company Manual,Manual. Golden Queen’s shareholders are entitled to vote onQueen has determined that the Joint Venture resolution. Section 501(c) of the TSX Company Manual states that if the value of the consideration to be received by an insider in connection with a transaction exceeds 10% of the market capitalization of an issuer, the transactionTransaction Resolution must be approved by the shareholdersboth (a) ⅔ of the issuer, other thanvotes cast on the insider. The Clay Group is considered an “insider” underTransaction Resolution, and (b) a simple majority of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution by the Shareholders, excluding votes cast by Shareholders that are required to be excluded pursuant to applicable securities laws and the policies of the TSX,TSX. The votes attached to an aggregate of 177,701,229 Shares (representing approximately 59.2% of the issued and outstanding Shares) owned by the Purchasers will be excluded from voting in determining whether the Transaction Resolution has been approved by the minority Shareholders.

Golden Queen is contributing US$35,750,000also proposing to the Joint Venture. This exceeds 10%complete a consolidation of its Shares (the “Consolidation”) whereby each ten existing Shares will be consolidated into one post-consolidation common share of Golden Queen’s market capitalizationQueen (each a “Post-Consolidation Share”). Shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on the Consolidation Resolution, which must be approved by ⅔ of approximately US$116,600,000 at the datevotes cast on the Consolidation Resolution. Management intends to proceed with the Consolidation on completion of the Transaction, Agreement, triggeringbut completion of the requirement for shareholder approval. The enclosed Proxy Statement provides background and summary informationTransaction is not contingent on the Joint Venture, as well as information on how to vote your Shares.approval of the Consolidation Resolution.

- 1 -


2.              When and where isAt the Meeting, Shareholders will also be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, certain compensation payable to Golden Queen’s named executive officers, including compensation that will or may be paid or become payable under existing employment agreements in connection with the Joint Venture?proposed Transaction. The Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution requires approval by a simple majority of the votes cast on the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution. With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes, the Shareholders will be deemed to have selected the frequency option that receives the most votes.

See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Shareholder Approval”, “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 2: Share Consolidation – Shareholder Approval”, “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” and “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 4: Advisory Vote on Say-on-Pay Frequency”.

The election of directors, appointment of auditors and approval of the stock option plan must be approved by a simple majority of the votes cast on such resolutions.

See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 5: Election of Directors”, “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 6: Appointment of Independent Auditors” and “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 7: Approval of Stock Option Plan”.

Date, Time and Place of Meeting and Record Date

The Meeting will take placebe held at #2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C. on May 13, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific StandardTime). The board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) has fixed April 3, 2019, at the close of business, as the record date for the determination of the Shareholders entitled to receive notice of the Meeting and to vote thereat (the “Record Date”).

Reasons for the Transaction

Despite the extensive efforts of our management and the Board, operations at the Soledad Mountain Project have not generated sufficient free cash flow to award dividends to Golden Queen and may require significant additional cash to continue. Golden Queen has been unable to attract sufficient capital to fund its own operations and GQM LLC, other than through loans and investment from members of the Clay family. Payments due under such loans have been extended but are coming due in the near future.


The Board appointed a special committee, composed of independent directors of the Board (the “Special Committee”) to, in conjunction with legal and financial advisors, evaluate the Transaction as well as explore potential alternatives to the Transaction. In recommending the Transaction, the Special Committee and the Board considered and evaluated a number of factors, including:

·The Transaction will allow the Company to eliminate the indebtedness owed to the Purchasers. The Transaction resolves Golden Queen’s going concern issue and the possibility of entering into bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings by eliminating all outstanding debt payable by Golden Queen, including a scheduled debt repayment on February 8, 2019, and additional payments due in April and May 2019.

·The belief of the Special Committee and Board, after consultation with Golden Queen’s financial and legal advisors and management, and after review of the other strategic opportunities reasonably available to Golden Queen, including the possibility of not engaging in the Transaction and pursuing insolvency, in each case taking into account the potential benefits, risks and uncertainties associated with those other opportunities, that the Transaction represents Golden Queen’s best and most certain prospect for continuing in the current economic environment.

·The inability of Golden Queen to obtain refinancing of its maturing debt obligations or to raise new equity

financing from sources other than the Purchasers.

·The Special Committee and Board have concluded that the value offered to Shareholders under the Share Purchase Agreement is more favorable than the value that might have been realized by pursuing other business opportunities. Given the challenges that the Company has had in obtaining financing in the past few years, the Transaction was deemed to be a superior alternative which will allow Shareholders to realize the value of its assets.

·The Transaction provides a meaningful cash treasury to assess various options to provide or return value to Shareholders going forward. After closing of the Transaction, the Company will apply to list on the NEX board of the TSX Venture Exchange in order to restructure its affairs and pursue new business opportunities.

·The receipt of a confidential preliminary valuation and fairness opinion (the “Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion”), subsequently confirmed by a formal valuation and fairness opinion (the “Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion”), from Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) that, as of the date thereof, and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications contained therein, the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Shareholders, other than the Purchasers.

·Eliminates the Purchasers’ majority ownership position, materially increasing retained ownership by remaining shareholders.

·Decreases administrative expenses for Golden Queen following closing of the Transaction.

·The Special Committee considered the further development required of the Soledad Mountain Project, the uncertain and unpredictable nature of the mining industry, the volatility of gold and silver prices, increases in operational and development costs among other factors that would impact Golden Queen’s ability to realize profit from the Soledad Mountain Project in the foreseeable future.

·The Special Committee considered the impending significant capital contributions needed to be made by Golden Queen under the joint venture agreement with respect to the Soledad Mountain Project and Golden Queen’s lack of cash resources and financing opportunities to be able to fund such additional capital.

·The Share Purchase Agreement allowed Golden Queen to continue to solicit, initiate, encourage and participate in discussions regarding competing proposals to the Transaction, until April 1, 2019. In addition, the Board had the right to terminate the Share Purchase Agreement to accept a superior proposal, subject to payment of a US$1M termination fee.


·The Share Purchase Agreement provides for a contingent payment to Golden Queen if the Soledad Mountain Project is subsequently sold or transferred to a third party in certain circumstances.

·The Transaction requires approval of ⅔ of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution, and a majority of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution by the Shareholders, excluding votes cast by the Purchasers, meaning that Shareholders who do not have an interest in the Transaction are provided with the opportunity to vote for or against the Transaction.

We recommend that you review in detail the potential benefits and risks associated with the Transaction which are set out in under “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Reasons for the Transaction” and “Risk Factors”.

Recommendation of the Special Committee and Board

After careful consideration, and taking into account the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, consultation with its financial and legal advisors, and such matters as it considered relevant, the Special Committee unanimously determined that the Transaction, as proposed in the Share Purchase Agreement, is in the best interests of Golden Queen and the Shareholders (excluding the Purchasers) and recommended the Board approve the Transaction, and recommend that Shareholders vote for the Transaction Resolution.

The Board received the recommendation of the Special Committee, and after taking into account the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, consulting with its financial and legal advisors, and considering such matters as it deemed relevant, the Board determined that the Transaction, as proposed in the Share Purchase Agreement, is in the best interests of Golden Queen and the Shareholders (excluding the Purchasers) and approved the entering into of the Share Purchase Agreement.The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the Transaction Resolution, Consolidation Resolution and Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution and FOR the option of “3 Years” as the preferred frequency on Say-on-Pay Votes.

See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Recommendation of the Special Committee”, “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Recommendation of the Board”, “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 2: Share Consolidation”, “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 3: Advisory Vote On Executive Compensation” and “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 4: Advisory Vote on Say-on-Pay Frequency”.

The Board also recommends that Shareholders vote FOR each nominee for director of the Company, the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditors for the ensuing year, and the approval of the stock option plan.

See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 5: Election of Directors”, “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 6: Appointment of Independent Auditors” and “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 7: Approval of Stock Option Plan”.

Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion

The Special Committee engaged EY to provide the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing by the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion. Prior to entering into the Share Purchase Agreement, the Special Committee received the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion that provided a valuation of Golden Queen and concluded, subject to certain assumptions, limitations and qualifications, that the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Shareholders, other than the Purchasers.

A summary of the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion is included in this Proxy Statement. See the section entitled “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Opinion of the Financial Advisor”. The full Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion will be filed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and SEDAR at www.sedar.com under the filings made by Golden Queen on or about [♦], 2019. Shareholders may also request a copy of the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion from Golden Queen free of charge. See the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Additional Information”.


The Board recommends that Shareholders read the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion in its entirety for a description of assumptions made, matters considered and limitations and qualifications on the review undertaken in connection with its preparation. It does not constitute a recommendation to Shareholders as to whether they should vote in favor of the Transaction Resolution. It is one of many factors taken into consideration by the Special Committee and Board to unanimously approve the Transaction.

Effect of the Transaction

If the Transaction is completed, Golden Queen will have no material assets and no active business. Golden Queen intends to restructure its affairs and pursue new business opportunities. Golden Queen will remain a reporting issuer in the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and the United States. Golden Queen intends to apply to list on the NEX board of the TSX Venture Exchange, and expects its listing on the OTCQX Best Market to be moved to a lower tier exchange of the OTC Markets Group Inc.

The Transaction will not alter the rights, privileges or nature of the issued and outstanding Shares. A Shareholder, other than the Purchasers, who holds Shares immediately prior to the closing of the Transaction, will continue to hold the same number of Shares immediately following the closing. See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Effect of the Transaction”.

Tax Consequences of the Transaction

Golden Queen expects there will be no material tax consequences to the Company or Shareholders (excluding the Purchasers), under theIncome Tax Act (Canada) or the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) as a result of the Transaction. However, Shareholders should consult their own legal and tax advisors for advice with respect to their particular circumstances.

See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Tax Consequences”.

The Consolidation

The Board believes it is in the best interest of Golden Queen to reduce the number of outstanding Shares, making Golden Queen more attractive to investors in potential future financings and transactions that may follow the Transaction. If the Transaction is completed and Golden Queen proceeds with the Consolidation, the number of Shares issued and outstanding will be reduced from 122,400,212 Shares, after cancellation of Shares pursuant to the Transaction, to approximately 12,240,021 Post-Consolidation Shares issued and outstanding. Except for any variances attributable to the rounding of fractional Post-Consolidation Shares, the change in the number of issued and outstanding Shares will cause no change in the capital attributable to the Shares and will not materially affect any Shareholder’s percentage ownership in Golden Queen. In addition, the Consolidation will not materially affect any Shareholder’s proportionate voting rights.

See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 2: Share Consolidation”.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following is a summary of certain information contained in or incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement, together with some of the questions that you, as Shareholder, may have and answers to those questions. You are urged to read the remainder of this Proxy Statement and the enclosed Proxy carefully, because the information contained below is of a summary nature, and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information contained elsewhere in or incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement, the Proxy and the attached schedules to this Proxy Statement, all of which are important and should be reviewed carefully.

This Proxy Statement is provided to you in connection with the solicitation by or on behalf of management of Golden Queen of proxies to be used at the Meeting to be held at #2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 3X2 onMay 13, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) for the purposes indicated in the attached Notice of Meeting.

Your vote is very important. We encourage you to exercise your right to vote by proxy if:

1)you cannot attend the Meeting; or

2)you plan to attend the Meeting but prefer the convenience of voting in advance.

The questions and answers below give general guidance for voting your Shares and related matters. Unless otherwise noted, all answers relate to both Registered Shareholders and Beneficial Shareholders. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Brenda Dayton, the Corporate Secretary of Golden Queen at 1-778-373-1557 or info@goldenqueen.com, or Laurel Hill Advisory Group, our proxy solicitation agent, by telephone at: 1-877-452-7184 (North American Toll Free) or 416-304-0211 (Collect Outside North America), or by email at: assistance@laurelhill.com.

1.What matters will be voted on at the Meeting?

Golden Queen has entered into a Share Purchase Agreement pursuant to which it will sell its interest in the Soledad Mountain Project to the Purchasers, who are related parties of Golden Queen. Golden Queen is also seeking approval of a proposed Consolidation. At the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to:

(a)consider and, if thought advisable, to pass, a special resolution to approve the Transaction, that, for corporate law purposes, constitutes the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company;

(b)consider and, if deemed advisable, to pass, a special resolution to approve the consolidation of the capital of the Company on the basis of ten (10) existing Shares for each one (1) Post-Consolidation Share;

(c)consider and, if thought advisable, to pass a resolution, on an advisory and non-binding basis, certain compensation arrangements with our named executive officers, including compensation under existing employment agreements, payable in connection with the Transaction;

(d)hold an advisory and non-binding vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes;

(e)set the number of directors at three (3) and elect directors to serve until the next annual general meeting, or until their respective successors are elected or appointed;

(f)re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the financial year ending December 31, 2019, and authorize the directors to fix the auditors’ remuneration; and

(g)consider and, if thought advisable, to pass, a resolution approving the Company’s stock option plan.

See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting”.


2.Does the Board support the Transaction and Consolidation?

Yes. The Board, on <>, 2014,recommendation of the Special Committee and based upon its own investigations, has unanimously determined that the Transaction is in the best interests of Golden Queen and the Shareholders (excluding the Purchasers) and recommends that Shareholders voteFOR the Transaction Resolution.

In making its recommendations, the Special Committee and the Board considered a number of factors as described in this Proxy Statement. See“Matters to be Acted Upon at <>the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Reasons for the Transaction”,“Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Recommendation of the Special Committee” and “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Recommendation of the Board.

3.             

The Board also recommends that Shareholders voteFOR the Consolidation Resolution, Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution, each nominee for director of the Company, the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditors for the ensuing year, and the approval of the stock option plan.

3.Why should I support the Transaction?

Golden Queen faces ongoing operational challenges and requires additional funding for its operations. Golden Queen has been unable to attract sufficient capital, other than receiving loans and investment from members of the Clay family. The benefits of the Transaction to Shareholders include, but are not limited to:

·Resolves going concern issue and the possibility of entering into bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings by eliminating all outstanding debt payable by Golden Queen, including a scheduled debt repayment on February 8, 2019, and additional payments due in April and May 2019.
·Provides certainty of value and value that is more favorable than the value that might have been received by pursuing other business opportunities.
·The Share Purchase Agreement includes an additional payment to Golden Queen if the Soledad Mountain Project is subsequently sold or transferred to a third party in certain circumstances.
·Eliminates the Clay’s majority ownership position, materially increasing retained ownership by remaining Shareholders.
·Provides a meaningful cash treasury to assess various options to provide or return value to Shareholders.
·Decreases administrative expenses for Golden Queen following closing of the Transaction.
·According to the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, as of the date thereof, and subject to certain assumptions, limitations and qualifications, the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Shareholders, other than the Purchasers.
·If the Transaction is not approved and cannot be completed, all amounts owing under Golden Queen’s outstanding debt will become immediately due and payable, and Golden Queen will still be required to pay expenses associated with the Transaction, meaning Golden Queen will continue to have a going concern issue.

We recommend that you review in detail the potential benefits and risks associated with the Transaction set out under “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Reasons for the Transaction” and “Risk Factors”.

4.           Why am I being asked to vote on a proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, certain compensation arrangements with the Company’s named executive officers, including compensation payable in connection with the Transaction?

The Dodd-Frank Act requires all public companies to hold a separate non-binding advisory stockholder vote to approve the compensation disclosed in this Proxy Statement for our executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table (commonly known as the “Say on Pay” proposal). The Company has disclosed the compensation of the Named Executive Officers pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In addition, our existing employment agreements with our named executive officers were not previously subject to an advisory vote of shareholders and under SEC rules, we are required to seek approval, on an advisory and non-binding basis, of these agreements because compensation will or may be paid or become payable in connection with the Transaction. Approval of this proposal is not a condition to the completion of the Transaction and the vote on this proposal is an advisory vote and will not be binding on the Company.

 8

5.Why am I being asked to vote on a the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes?

The Dodd-Frank act also requires all public companies to hold a separate non-binding advisory shareholder vote with respect to the frequency of the vote on Say on Pay. Companies must give shareholders the choice of whether to cast an advisory vote on the Say on Pay proposal every year, every two years, or every three years (common known as the “Frequency Vote on Say on Pay.”) Shareholders may also abstain from making a choice, pursuant to the proposed rules recently issued by the SEC. After such initial votes are held, the Dodd-Frank Act requires all public companies to submit to their shareholders no less often than every six years thereafter the Frequency Vote on Say on Pay. Our last Frequency Vote on Say on Pay was held on May 30, 2013. Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are holding a separate non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of Say on Pay in future years at the Annual Meeting.

6.Who is entitled to vote?

Shareholders of record as of the close of business on <>, 2014 (the “Record Date”)April 3, 2019 are entitled to vote at the Meeting, excluding the Clay Group and associates and affiliates of the Clay Group.

4.              Which securities of the Company are entitled to vote and how many votes does each shareholder have?

Meeting. Each shareholderShareholder has one vote for each Share held. The Shares are the only securities of the Company that entitle their holders to vote at the Meeting.

5.             

7.How do I vote?

If you are a Registered Shareholder, you may vote on the Joint VentureTransaction by either attending the Meeting in person or by completing and returning the enclosed Proxy in accordance with its instructions. Registered Shareholders may wish to vote by proxy whether or not they attend the Meeting in person. Registered Shareholders electing to submit a proxy may do so by completing the enclosed Proxy and returning it to the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, in accordance with the instructions on the Proxy. You should ensure that the Proxy is received by Computershare at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the Meeting.

Beneficial Shareholders who own Shares through their broker or other intermediary should follow the instructions provided by their intermediary. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or intermediary, you may lose your right to vote at the Meeting.

See “ProxyGeneral Proxy Information – Proxy Voting – Beneficial Shareholders” for more information on how to vote your Shares.

6.             

8.How many votes are necessary to approve the Transaction and Consolidation?

Golden Queen has determined that the Joint Venture?

The Joint Venture resolutionTransaction Resolution must be approved by (a) ⅔ of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution, and (b) a simple majority of the votes cast on the resolutionTransaction Resolution by the shareholders of Golden Queen present in person orShareholders, excluding votes cast by proxy atShareholders that are required to be excluded pursuant to applicable securities laws and the Meeting, excluding those votes in respect of Shares held by the Clay Group and affiliates and associatespolicies of the Clay Group (which amountTSX. The votes attached to 30.6%an aggregate of 177,701,229 Shares (representing approximately 59.2% of the issued and outstanding SharesShares) owned by the Purchasers will be excluded from voting in determining whether the Transaction has been approved by the minority Shareholders of Golden Queen).Queen.

7.              What is the recommendation

The Consolidation Resolution must be approved by ⅔ of the Board regarding the Joint Venture?

The Board,votes cast on the recommendationConsolidation Resolution. The Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution must be approved by a simple majority of the Special Committee,votes cast on the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution. Completion of the Transaction is not contingent on the approval of the Consolidation Resolution or Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution.

9.Do I have dissent rights?

Registered Shareholders have the right to dissent in respect of the Transaction Resolution, and based upon its own investigations, has unanimously concluded thatto be paid the Joint Venture isfair value of their Shares. To exercise dissent rights in respect of the Transaction Resolution, a written notice of objection to the Transaction Resolution must be received by Golden Queen in accordance with the instructions set out in the best interestsProxy Statement by 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on May 9, 2019, or two business days prior to any adjournment of Golden Queen. The Board recommends that the shareholders vote FOR the Joint Venture.

8.              Why has the Board chosenMeeting. Failure to pursue the Joint Venture?

Most importantly, the Joint Venture will provide the Companystrictly comply with the funds requireddissent procedures will result in the loss of any right to develop and operatedissent. See“Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Project. ConstructionMountain Project – Dissent Rights” and Schedule B of infrastructure has been underway since July 2013, and the Joint Venture will provide the funds to continue that development.Proxy Statement.


The Special Committee and the Board considered various sources of funding, and the Joint Venture provides a low-risk, equity-based capital structureShareholders do not have dissent rights with no hedging and no financial covenants. In addition, it includes Leucadia, a well-respected and credible long-term partner with a history of successful investments in the mining sector. It is also supported by the Clay Group, who are long-term shareholders who have supported the Company for over 20 years, showing their dedicationrespect to the Company and the Soledad Project.proposed Consolidation or Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution.

- 2 -


10.Are there any other approvals required for the Transaction or Consolidation?

9.              Are there any other approvals required for the Joint Venture?

In addition to approval by Golden Queen’s shareholders, the Joint VentureShareholders, the Transaction is subject to final approval from the TSX. The Company has made a submission toreceived conditional approval of the Transaction from the TSX, and the provisions of the Proxy Statement relating to the resolutionTransaction Resolution sought were reviewed and accepted by the TSX, but there is no guarantee that the Joint VentureTransaction will receive final approval from the TSX.

10.            When

Management intends to proceed with the Consolidation on completion of the Transaction. The Consolidation is subject to the approval of the TSX, and there is no guarantee that the Consolidation will receive approval from the Joint VentureTSX.

11.When will the Transaction and Consolidation be effective?

Golden Queen Gauss Holdings and Auvergnethe Purchasers are working to close the Joint VentureTransaction as soon as reasonably practicable. Subject to the approval of Golden Queen’s shareholdersthe Shareholders and the final approval from the TSX, the parties currently anticipate that the Joint VentureTransaction will close by <>, 2014.before May 21, 2019. However, there can be no certainty that the Joint VentureTransaction will close, and shareholdersShareholders are advised to review the “Risk Factors” sectionMatters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Reasons for the Transaction” and “Risk Factors” sections of this Proxy Statement.

11.            What happens if

Management intends to proceed with the Joint VentureConsolidation on completion of the Transaction. If the Consolidation Resolution is approved, the Board will have the authority, in their sole discretion, to revoke the Consolidation Resolution and abandon the Consolidation. See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 2: Share Consolidation”.

12.What happens if the Transaction is not approved by the Shareholders or does not close?

If the Transaction is not approved by the shareholders or does not close?Shareholders, the Share Purchase Agreement will terminate. All amounts owing under Golden Queen’s outstanding debt will become immediately due and payable, and Golden Queen will still be required to pay expenses associated with the Transaction. Golden Queen will continue to have a going concern issue and face the possibility of entering into bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings. See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project – Reasons for the Transaction” and “Risk Factors” in this Proxy Statement.

13.What happens if the Consolidation is not approved by the Shareholders or is not implemented?

If the Joint VentureConsolidation is not approved by the shareholders,Shareholders or the Consolidation is not implemented by the Board, there will be no change in the Shares. Completion of the Transaction Agreement will terminate and Golden Queen willis not contingent on the approval of the Consolidation Resolution. See “Matters to be obliged to reimburse expenses in an aggregate amount of US$2,275,000 to Gauss Holdings and Auvergne within 15 days of a demand for payment from Gauss Holdings and Auvergne. In addition, Golden Queen will be forced to seek other parties interested in developing the Soledad Project, or other financing options. There is no guarantee that Golden Queen will be able to find other funding opportunities that would allow Golden Queen to continue to develop the Soledad Project, or that would be on terms acceptable to the Company. See “Risk Factors” in the Proxy Statement.

12.            What if I change my mind after I return my proxy?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls closeActed Upon at the Meeting by:– Proposal 2: Share Consolidation”.

(a)14.

Executing a Proxy bearing a later date or by executing a valid notice of revocation; or

(b)

Personally attending the meeting and voting the Registered Shareholders’ Shares.

Who can I contact if I have questions?

For more details on revoking your proxy, see the “Revocation of Proxies” section of the Proxy Statement.

13.            Who can I contact if I have questions?

Shareholders whoIf you would like additional copies of these materials or who have any questions about the Joint Venture,Transaction or Consolidation, the information contained in this Proxy Statement, or the Meeting, including voting procedures, shouldplease contact their brokerBrenda Dayton of Golden Queen at 1-778-373-1557 or info@goldenqueen.com, or Laurel Hill Advisory Group, our proxy solicitation agent, by telephone at 1-877-452-7184, or by email at assistance@laurelhill.com.

Shareholders who have questions about how to vote should contact their professional advisors.

- 3 -


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING DISCLOSURE

SUMMARY OF THE TERMS OF THE JOINT VENTURE

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the management of Golden Queen for use at the Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. No person has been authorized to give any information or make any representation in connection with the Transaction, Consolidation or any other matters to be considered at the Meeting other than those contained in this Proxy Statement and, if given or made, any such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized and should not be relied upon in making a decision as to how to vote on the Transaction and Consolidation.


All summaries of, and references to, the Transaction in this Proxy Statement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the complete text of the Share Purchase Agreement, a copy of which is available with Golden Queen’s filings on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and SEDAR at www.sedar.com, or may be requested free of charge from Golden Queen, and is incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement. Information contained in this Proxy Statement should not be construed as legal, tax or financial advice and Shareholders are urged to consult their own professional advisors in connection therewith.

Information contained in this Proxy Statement is given as of April [♦], 2019, unless otherwise specifically stated.

INFORMATION FOR U.S. SECURITYHOLDERS

The followingenforcement by Shareholders of civil liabilities under United States federal securities laws may be affected adversely by the fact that Golden Queen is organized under the laws of a jurisdiction outside the United States and that some of its officers and/or directors are residents of countries other than the United States and that some of the experts named in this Proxy Statement may be residents of countries other than the United States.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the Transaction, passed upon the merits or fairness of the Transaction or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this Proxy Statement. Any representation to the contrary is a summarycriminal offense.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Proxy Statement constitute forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively “forward-looking statements”). The use of any of the proposed Joint Venturewords “anticipate”, “continue”, “expect”, “may”, “will”, “proposed”, “should”, “believe”, “is subject” and similar expressions are intended to developidentify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and operateunknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. The Company believes the Soledad Project, which shareholdersexpectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be askedcorrect. Such forward-looking statements included in this Proxy Statement should not be unduly relied upon. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

In particular, this Proxy Statement includes forward-looking statements pertaining to approvethe following:

·completion of the Transaction and Consolidation;
·the anticipated benefits of the Transaction and Consolidation to the Company and the Shareholders;
·the timing and receipt of all regulatory, shareholder and other approvals for the Transaction and Consolidation;
·the ability of the Company and the Purchasers to satisfy the other conditions to, and to complete, the Transaction;
·anticipated timing for the completion of the Transaction and Consolidation;
·ability of the Company tolist on the NEX board of the TSX Venture Exchange and remain listed on an OTC Markets Group Inc. exchange; and
·ability of the Company to restructure its affairs and pursue new opportunities.

In respect of the forward-looking statements and information concerning the anticipated benefits and timing of the Transaction and Consolidation, the Company has provided such in reliance on certain assumptions that it believes are reasonable at this time, including assumptions as to the Meeting. This isability of the Company to receive, in a summary only,timely manner and shareholders are encouragedon satisfactory terms, the necessary Shareholder and regulatory approvals; the ability of the parties to readsatisfy, in a timely manner, the full disclosure under “Proposal: Joint Ventureother conditions to the closing of the Transaction; and other expectations and assumptions concerning the Transaction and Consolidation. Anticipated dates provided may change for a number of reasons, such as the Soledad Mountain Project” which appears laterinability to secure the necessary Shareholder and regulatory approvals in the time assumed or the need for additional time to satisfy the other conditions to the completion of the Transaction. Accordingly, Shareholders should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and information contained in this Proxy Statement.

Pursuant to an agreement dated June 8, 2014 (the “Transaction Agreement”),

Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the Company, Golden Queen Mining Company, Inc., the Company’s wholly-owned California subsidiary (“GQ California”), Gauss Holdings, Auvergnerisk factors set forth below and Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) agreed to enter into the Joint Venture. Under the Transaction Agreement the parties have agreed as follows:elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, including, without limitation, risk and uncertainties regarding:


·

the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the Share Purchase Agreement, including a termination under circumstances that could require the Company will form a new California subsidiary (“GQ Holdco”), and contribute allto pay the outstanding stock of GQ California (which ownstermination fee to the Soledad Project)Purchasers;

·inability to GQ Holdco;

GQ Holdco will convert GQ California into a limited liability company;

GQ California will transfer all of its debts and liabilitiescomplete the Transaction due to GQ Holdco, and GQ Holdco will become the guarantorfailure to obtain Shareholder approval of the loans currently guaranteed by GQ California;

on closingTransaction Resolution or the failure to satisfy other conditions to the completion of the Joint Venture:

Transaction;

o

·

Gauss will contribute US$110,000,000the failure of the Transaction to GQ California;

become effective for any other reason;

o

·

GQ Californiathe possibility that alternative acquisition proposals will issue units to Gauss, such that Gaussor will own 50% of GQ California;

not be made;

o

·

the Company, GQ Holdco, GQ Californiaeffect of termination fees being payable in soliciting alternative acquisition proposals;

·risks that the Transaction disrupts current plans and Gauss will enter into an amended and restated limited liability company agreement of GQ California regarding the operation of GQ Californiaoperations and the management of the Soledad Project (the “JV Agreement”);

if the Company terminates the Transaction Agreementpotential difficulties in certain circumstances, includingemployee retention as a result of the Transaction;

·the outcome of any legal proceedings or enforcement matters that may be instituted against us or others relating to the Share Purchase Agreement;
·diversion of management’s attention from ongoing operational concerns;
·the possible adverse effect on our business and the price of the Shares if the Transaction is not consummated in a timely manner or at all;
·the effect of the announcement of the Transaction on our business relationships, operating results and business generally, including our ability to retain key employees;
·the amount of costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the Transaction;
·inability to complete the Consolidation due to the failure to obtain theShareholder approval of the Joint Venture by the shareholders, the Company will be required to pay US$2,000,000 to Gauss Holdings and US$275,000 to Auvergne, in respect of their expenses (the “Expenses Fees”); and

Consolidation;
·

if the Transaction Agreement is terminated and the Company enters into an agreement with another party that constitutes a Superior Proposal (as defineduncertainties in the Transaction Agreement), the Company will be required to pay a termination fee in an aggregate amountavailability and success of US$2,500,000, less any Expenses Fees paid, to Gauss Holdings and Auvergne.

future opportunities;

The JV Agreement to be entered into on closing of the Joint Venture will contain the following terms:

during the nine month period following the effective date of the JV Agreement:

o

GQ Holdco will have the right to make a single capital contribution to GQ California of no less than US$15,000,000 and no more than US$25,000,000, with each such threshold to be reduced by 50% of the amount of any proceeds received by GQ California from any debt financing transaction completed (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, any debt incurred by GQ California prior to the closing of the Joint Venture and that will be repaid in connection with such closing) (the “GQ Top Up Right”);

o

if GQ Holdco exercises the GQ Top Up Right, Gauss will be required to make a capital contribution to GQ California in an amount equal to the amount that GQ Holdco contributes; and

o

if GQ Holdco does not exercise the GQ Top Up Right, Gauss will be obligated to make a capital contribution to GQ California of US$40,000,000, less the amount of any proceeds received by GQ California from any debt financing transaction completed (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, any debt incurred by GQ California prior to the closing of the Joint Venture and that will be repaid in connection with such closing);

- 4 -



·

other than as described above, Gauss and GQ Holdco will not be required or permitted to make additional capital contributions, other than with the approval of the board of managers of GQ California;

GQ California will be managed by a board of managers made up of three representatives from Gauss and three representatives from GQ Holdco. For so long as the Clay Group beneficially owns at least 25%ability of the Company at least oneto continue to operate upon completion of GQ Holdco’s representatives on the board of managers shall be designated by Auvergne;

Transaction; and

·

if GQ Holdco does not exercise the GQ Top Up Right,other factors discussed under “Matters to be Acted Upon and Gauss makes its required capital contribution, the boardMeeting – Proposal 1: Sale of managers of GQ California will be reduced to five,the Soledad Mountain Project – Reasons for the Transaction and GQ Holdco will lose one representative on the board; and

the board of managers will elect officers of GQ California, and delegate certain powers to those officers. The initial officers of GQ California will be H. Lutz Klingmann (Chief Executive Officer) and Andrée St-Germain (Chief Financial Officer)Risk Factors. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Klingmann will have direct and general charge and supervision of all business and administrative operations of GQ California. As Chief Financial Officer, Ms. St- Germain will be in charge of GQ California’s funds.

Additional information on other factors that could cause actual events or actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements and information contained in this Proxy Statement may be found in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR, and with Canadian regulatory authorities on SEDAR, including the risk factors contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The Company also entered into a rights offering backstop agreement with Gauss Holdingsforward-looking statements and Auvergne (the “StandbyCommitment”). Underinformation contained in this Proxy Statement are based on our expectations, estimates and projections as of the Standby Commitment:

if the Company conducts a rights offering, Gauss Holdings and Auvergne will, subject to certain terms, conditions and limitations, and at the option of the Company, purchase all or part of the Shares issuable pursuant to any rights that are unexercised by other holders of rights up to a maximum of US$45,000,000 at the lesser of (i) the price in United States currency at which the Shares are offered to holders of rights, or (ii) US$1.10 per Share; and

on closing of the Joint Venture, the Company will pay Gauss Holdings and Auvergne a non-refundable fee in an aggregate amount of US$2,250,000 in consideration of the Standby Commitment.

The Company will consider alternate sources of funding,date hereof, and the sizeshould not be relied upon as representing our estimates as of any possible rights offering would be decreasedsubsequent date.

The forward-looking statements contained in thisProxy Statement are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Except as required under applicable securities laws, the amountCompany does not undertake or assume any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. Shareholders should read this entireProxy Statementand consult their own professional advisors to assess the legal issues, risk factors and other aspects of any other financing received from other sources.the Transaction and Consolidation prior to voting their Shares.

APPOINTMENT OF PROXYHOLDER

GENERAL PROXY INFORMATION

Appointment of Proxyholder

The persons named as proxyholder in the accompanying Proxy (“Proxy”) or VIFVoting Instruction Form (“VIF”) were designated by the management of the Company (“Management Proxyholder”).A shareholderShareholder desiring to appoint some other person (“Alternate Proxyholder”) to represent him or her at the Meeting may do so by inserting such other person's name in the space indicated on the Proxy or VIF, or by completing another proper form of proxy.A person appointed as an Alternate Proxyholder need not be a shareholderShareholder of the Company.

EXERCISE OF DISCRETION BY PROXYHOLDER

Exercise of Discretion by Proxyholder

The proxyholder will vote for or against or withhold from voting the Shares, as directed by a shareholderShareholder on the Proxy, on any ballot that may be called for.In the absence of any such direction, the Management Proxyholder will vote in favor of matters described in the Proxy or VIF. In the absence of any direction as to how to vote the Shares, an Alternate Proxyholder has discretion to vote them as he or she chooses.

 12

The enclosed Proxy or VIF confers discretionary authority upon theproxyholder with respect to amendments or variations tomatters identified in the attached Notice of Meeting and other matters which may properlycome before the Meeting.At present, Managementmanagement of the Company knows of no such amendments, variations or other matters. Shareholders who are planning on returning the accompanying Proxy are encouraged to review the Proxy Statement carefully before submitting the Proxy. Unless otherwise directed, the persons named in the Proxy intend to vote in favor of the matters to be considered at the Meeting.

- 5 -


PROXY VOTING

Proxy Voting

Registered Shareholders

If you are a Registered Shareholder, you may wish to vote by proxy whether or not you attend the Meeting in person. Registered Shareholders electing to submit a Proxy may do so by completing the enclosed Proxy and returning it to the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, in accordance with the instructions on the Proxy. Youby:

(i)completing, dating and signing the enclosed form of Proxy and returning it to Computershare, by mail or hand delivery at 8th Floor, 100 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2Y1, Canada;

(ii)using a touch-tone phone to transmit voting choices to the toll-free number given in the Proxy. Registered Shareholders who choose this option must follow the instructions of the voice response system and refer to the enclosed Proxy for the toll-free number, the holder’s account number and the Proxy Control Number; or

(iii)using the internet through the website of Computershare at www.investorvote.com. Registered Shareholders who choose this option must follow the instructions that appear on the screen and refer to the enclosed Proxy for the holder’s account number and the Proxy Control Number.

In all cases you should ensure that the Proxy is received by Computershare at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the Meeting or anythe adjournment thereof at which the Proxy is to be used. The chairman of the Meeting may elect to exercise his discretion to accept proxies received subsequently.after the due date.

Beneficial Shareholders

The following information is of significant importance to Beneficial Shareholders (shareholders who do not hold Shares in their own name). There are two kinds of Beneficial Shareholders – those who object to their name being made known to the issuers of securities which they own (called OBOs for Objecting Beneficial Owners) and those who do not object to the issuers of the securities they own knowing who they are (called NOBOs for Non-Objecting Beneficial Owners). Beneficial Shareholders should note that the only proxies that can be recognized and acted upon at the Meeting are those deposited by Registered Shareholders (those whose names appear on the records of the Company as the registered holders of Shares).

If Shares are listed in an account statement provided to a shareholderShareholder by a broker, then in almost all cases those Shares will not be registered in the shareholder’sShareholder’s name on the records of the Company. Such Shares will more likely be registered under the names of the shareholder’sShareholder’s broker or an agent of that broker (both referred to as intermediaries). In the United States, the vast majority of such Shares are registered under the name of Cede & Co. as nominee for The Depository Trust Company (which acts as depositary for many U.S. brokerage firms and custodian banks), and in Canada, under the name of CDS & Co. (the registration name for The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited, which acts as nominee for many Canadian brokerage firms). Every intermediary has its own mailing procedures and provides its own return instructions to clients. However, most intermediaries now delegate responsibility for obtaining voting instructions from clients to Broadridge Investor Communications CorporationFinancial Solutions, Inc. (“BroadridgeBroadridge”) in the United States and in Canada.

The majority of Intermediaries now delegate responsibility for obtaining instructions from Beneficial Shareholders to Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (“Broadridge”). Broadridge typically mails a scannable voting instruction form (“VIF”) instead of the form of proxy. The to Beneficial Shareholder is askedShareholders and asks Beneficial Shareholders to completereturn the VIF and return it to Broadridge by mail or facsimile.Broadridge. Alternatively, the Beneficial Shareholder may call a toll-freetoll-free number or go online to www.proxyvote.com to vote. Golden Queen may utilize the Broadridge then tabulatesQuickVoteTM service to assist shareholders with voting their shares. Certain Beneficial Shareholders who have not objected to Golden Queen knowing who they are (non-objecting beneficial owners) may be contacted by Laurel Hill to conveniently obtain a vote directly over the resultsphone.


By returning the VIF in accordance with the instructions noted on it, a Beneficial Shareholder is able to instruct the Registered Shareholder (the intermediary) how to vote on behalf of allthe Beneficial Shareholder. VIFs, whether provided by the Company or by an intermediary, should be completed and returned in accordance with the specific instructions received and provides appropriate instructions with respectnoted on the VIF. In either case, the purpose of this procedure is to permit Beneficial Shareholders to direct the voting of Golden Queen Mining Shares to be represented at the applicable meeting.shares which they beneficially own.

The VIF will name the same persons as the Company's Proxy to represent you at the Meeting. Although as a Beneficial Shareholder you may not be recognized directly at the Meeting for the purposes of voting Shares registered in the name of your intermediary, you, or a person designated by you (who need not be a shareholder)Shareholder), may attend the Meeting as proxyholder for your intermediary and vote your Shares in that capacity. To exercise this right to attend the Meeting or appoint a proxyholder of your own choosing, you should insert the name of the desired representative in the blank space provided in the VIF. Alternatively, you may provide other written instructions requesting that you or your desired representative attend the Meeting as proxyholder for your intermediary. The completed VIF or other written instructions must then be returned in accordance with the instructions on the form.

Should a Beneficial Shareholder wish to attend and vote at the Meeting in person (or have another person attend and vote on behalf

Revocation of the Beneficial Holder), the Beneficial Shareholder should strike out the names of the persons named in the proxy or voting instruction form and insert the name of the Beneficial Shareholder (or such other person) in the blank space provided.In either case, Beneficial Shareholders should carefully follow the instructions of their intermediaries and their intermediaries’ service companies.Proxies

The Company may utilize the Broadridge QuickVote service to assist shareholders with voting their shares. NOBO’s may be contacted by Laurel Hill Advisory Group to conveniently obtain a vote directly over the phone.

- 6 -


REVOCATION OF PROXIES

In addition to revocation in any other manner permitted by law, a Registered Shareholder who has given a Proxy may revoke it by:

(a)

Executing a Proxy bearing a later date or by executing a valid notice of revocation, either of the foregoing to be executed by the Registered Shareholder or the Registered Shareholder’s authorized attorney in writing, or, if the shareholder is a corporation, under its corporate seal (if applicable) by an officer or attorney duly authorized, and by delivering the Proxy bearing a later date to Computershare at any time up to and including the last business day that precedes the day of the Meeting or, if the Meeting is adjourned, the last business day that precedes any reconvening thereof, or to the chairman of the Meeting on the day of the Meeting or any reconvening thereof, or in any other manner provided by law, or

(b)

Personally attending the meeting and voting the Registered Shareholders’ Shares.

A revocation of a Proxy will not affect a matter on which a vote is taken before the revocation.

Only Registered Shareholders have the right to revoke a Proxy. Beneficial Shareholders who wish to change their vote must, at least seven days beforein sufficient time in advance of the Meeting, arrange for their respective intermediaries to change their vote and if necessary, revoke their Proxy, in accordance with the Proxy on their behalf.revocation procedures set out above.

VOTING PROCEDURE

A quorum for the transaction of business at the Meeting is one person present at the meeting representing in person or by proxy not less than 10% of the votes eligible to be cast at such meeting. Broker non-votes occur when a person holding Shares through a bank or brokerage account does not provide instructions as to how his or her Shares should be voted and the broker does not exercise discretion to vote those Shares on a particular matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in determining the presence of a quorum at the Meeting, but will not be counted for or againstas votes cast at the Joint Venture.Meeting and, as a result, will have no effect on the outcome of the resolutions to be considered at the Meeting.

Shares for which Proxies are properly executed and returned will be voted at the Meeting in accordance with the directions noted thereon or, in the absence of directions, will be voted “FOR” the approval, by special resolution, of the Transaction Resolution, Consolidation Resolution, and the approval, by ordinary resolution, of the Joint Venture,Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution, election of directors, appointment of auditors and approval of the stock option plan, other than broker non-votes, which will not be counted for or against the Joint Venture.such resolutions. It is not expected that any matters other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement will be brought before the Meeting. If, however, other matters are properly presented, the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance with their discretion with respect to such matters.

To

Golden Queen has determined that the Transaction Resolution must be approved each matter which is submittedby (a) ⅔ of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution, and (b) a simple majority of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution by the Shareholders, excluding votes cast by Shareholders that are required to a votebe excluded pursuant to applicable securities laws and the policies of shareholdersthe TSX. The Consolidation Resolution must be approved by ⅔ of the votes cast on the Consolidation Resolution. The Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution must be approved by a simple majority of the votes cast on the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution. The election of directors, appointment of auditors and approval of the stock option plan must be approved by the shareholders voting in person or by proxy at the Meeting, excludinga simple majority of the votes cast on such resolutions. With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes, the Clay Group and associates and affiliates ofShareholders will be deemed to have selected the Clay Group.frequency option that receives the most votes.

 14

INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON

Purchaser Interests

The Purchasers include Thomas M. Clay, a memberformer director and officer of Golden Queen, and certain members of the Clay Group, is also the Chairman of the Board of Golden Queen.family and associated entities. The Clay Group, via Auvergne, will own 32.5% of Gauss, which will have a 50% interest in the Soledad Project. For so long as the Clay Group beneficially owns at least 25% of the Company, at least one of GQ Holdco’s representatives on the board of managers will be designated by Auvergne.

The Clay Group and affiliates and associates of the Clay GroupPurchasers own approximately 30.6%59.2% of the issued and outstanding Shares of Golden Queen.Shares. Any votes by the Clay Group and its associates and affiliatesPurchasers will be excluded in determining whether or not a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders of Golden Queen voting in person or by proxy at the Meeting have approved the Joint Venture.Transaction Resolution. As a result, the votes of the following shareholdersShareholders will be excluded from voting on the Joint Venture:Transaction Resolution:

- 7 -



Name Number of Shares(1(1))
 
LTC Corp.26,114
LTC Corp. Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan4,663
Landon T. Clay 2013-4 Annuity Trust7,281,553(2)
Estate of Landon T. Clay 17,047,019
108,499,796 
Monadnock CLT2,353,269
Charitable Lead Annuity Trust  
Skadutakee II CLT98,000
7,031,755 
Thomas M. Clay 1,805,680
6,658,116(2)
Arctic Coast PetroleumPetroleums Ltd. 807,250 
EHT, LLC  26,855,821 
HarrisJonathan Clay 7,258,330
3,683,413 
933 Milledge LLC 50,000
Jonathan Clay3,508,870(3)
185,000 
James Clay 32,000
118,400 
Lavinia Clay 2,35112,660,818 
Lavinia Clay – IRA  4,663
Cassius M.C. Clay1,465,398
Landon H. Clay5,665,471
Richard T. Clay4,065,328 
Total number of currently outstanding Shares held 30,566,362
Total number of Shares assuming conversion of convertible debentures40,275,099177,701,229 

(1)

The information relating to the above share ownership was provided by the Clay Group.

Purchasers.
(2)

Excludes 457,500 Shares reserved for immediate issuance onthat are issuable upon the exercise of convertible debentures.

outstanding, currently exercisable options of Golden Queen held directly by Mr. Thomas M. Clay.

Executive Officer Employment Agreements

This section sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation for each named executive officer of the Company, as well as the Company’s one other executive officer, that is based on or otherwise relates to the Transaction and that will or may become payable to each such named executive officer and such other executive officer at the closing of the Transaction or on a qualifying termination of employment in connection with the Transaction.

Two of our executive officers are entitled to certain change in control severance benefits, which may be triggered by the Transaction. The amounts set out below represent an estimate of each named executive officer’s golden parachute compensation, assuming the following:

·the Transaction constitutes a change in control for the purposes of the employment agreements;
·the change in control was effective [♦], 2019, the latest practicable date prior to this Proxy Statement; and

·each named executive officer's employment is terminated without cause or for good reason immediately following the change in control.

Golden Parachute Compensation

Name 

Cash

(US$)

  

Equity

(US$)

  

Pension

(US$)

  

Benefits

(US$)

  

Tax

Reimbursement

(US$)

  

Other

(US$)

  

Total

(US$)

 
Guy Le Bel  564,225(2)  Nil(3)  Nil   21,064   Nil   Nil   585,289 
Brenda Dayton  195,598(4)  Nil(5)  Nil   14,294   Nil    Nil   209,892 

(1)Amounts converted from Canadian dollars to United States dollars based on the March 19, 2019 noon rate of 0.7523 published by the Bank of Canada.
(2)If Mr. Le Bel is terminated within 12 months of a change of control by the Company without cause, for good reason, or for any other reason with 3 months’ notice, he is entitled to receive: (a) a lump sum severance payment equivalent to the sum of (i) 24 months’ base salary and (ii) the total target and signing bonus paid or granted in the last 12 months multiplied by 2; (b) payment for all accrued unused vacation time; and (c) continuing health and dental benefits coverage for the lessor of 24 months or until the employee is eligible under a benefits plan with a new employer.
(3)

Includes 2,427,184 Shares reservedIf Mr. Le Bel is terminated due to a change of control, any stock options held by him may be exercised for immediate issuance on exercise24 months following such termination. As of the date of the Share Purchase Agreement, Mr. Le Bel held 882,501 stock options, all of which are “out of the money”.

(4)If Ms. Dayton is terminated within 12 months of a convertible debenture.

change of control by the Company without cause, for good reason, or for any other reason with 3 months’ notice, she is entitled to receive: (a) a lump sum severance payment equivalent to the sum of (i) 12 months’ base salary and (ii) the total bonus paid or granted in the last 12 months multiplied by 2; (b) payment for all accrued and unused vacation time; and (c) continuing health and dental benefits coverage for the lessor of 12 months or until the employee is eligible under a benefits plan with a new employer.
(5)If Ms. Dayton is terminated due to a change of control, any stock options held by her may be exercised in accordance with the Company’s stock option plan. As of the date of the Share Purchase Agreement, Ms. Dayton held 220,000 stock options, all of which are “out of the money”.

The Transaction does not constitute a change of control for the purposes of Golden Queen’s stock option plan.

Except as disclosed above, no other Person has any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in matters to be acted upon at the Meeting. For the purpose of this paragraph, “Person” shall include each person: (a) who has been a director, senior officer or insider of the Company at any time since the commencement of the Company’s last fiscal year; or (b) who is an associate or affiliate of a person included in subparagraph (a).

VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES

On <>, 2014April 3, 2019 (the “Record Date”) there were 99,778,680300,101,441 Shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, each Share carrying the right to one vote. Only shareholdersShareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote in person or by proxy at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

To the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Company, the beneficial ownersno person or persons exercisingcorporation beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, Company Shares carrying more than 5% of the outstanding voting rights are:attached to the outstanding Shares, except as indicated below:

 Number of Approximate %
Name and AddressShares(1)Nature of Ownershipof Total Issued
Landon T. Clay17,077,796Sole voting and investment control17.1%
Providence, RI, USA10,550,072(2)(3)(4)(5)Shared voting and investment control10.6%
    
Thomas M. Clay 1,805,680Sole voting and investment control1.8%
Providence, RI, USA 8,098,803(2)(4)(5)Shared voting and investment control8.1%
    
Harris Clay 7,258,330Sole voting and investment control7.3%
Augusta, GA, USA 3,258,519(3)(4)Shared voting and investment control3.3%

- 8 -


Name and Address Number of Voting
Securities(1)
  Nature of Ownership Percentage of
Outstanding
Voting Securities
 
Thomas M. Clay
Boulder, CO, USA
  115,157,912(2)(3) Sole voting and investment control  38.37%
   7,839,005(4)(5) Shared voting and investment control  2.61%
Jonathan Clay
West Palm Beach, FL, USA
  30,724,234(6) Sole voting and investment control  10.23%



Name and Address
Number of
Shares(1)

Nature of Ownership
Approximate %
of Total Issued
Sprott Asset Management LP
Toronto, ON, Canada
8,569,900
Sole voting and investment control
8.6%

(1)

The information relating to the above share ownership was obtained by the Company from insider reports and beneficial ownership reports on Schedule 13D filed with the United States Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC or available atwww.sedi.com, www.sedi.ca, or from the shareholder, and includes direct and indirect holdings.

(2)

Includes 7,281,553(i) 6,658,116 Shares reservedheld directly by Mr. Thomas M. Clay; (ii) 108,499,796 Shares held by the Estate of Landon Thomas Clay (the “Estate”), for immediate issuance onwhich Mr. Thomas M. Clay is the executor. Mr. Thomas M. Clay disclaims beneficial ownership of the Shares held by the Estate.

(3)Excludes 257,500 Shares that are issuable upon the exercise of convertible debenturesoutstanding, currently exercisable options of Golden Queen held directly by Mr. Thomas M. Clay.
(4)Includes (i) 807,250 Shares held by Arctic Coast Petroleums, Ltd. (“Arctic Coast”), for which Mr. Thomas M. Clay is a director; and (ii) 7,031,755 Shares held by the Monadnock Charitable Annuity Lead Trust dated May 31, 1996 (the “Monadnock Trust”), for which East Hill Management Company, LLC (“East Hill”) is the investment manager and Mr. Thomas M. Clay is the sole manager of East Hill.
(5)Excludes (i) 10,740,600 Shares that are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding, currently exercisable warrants of Golden Queen held by the Landon T. Clay and2009 Irrevocable Trust u/a dated March 6, 2006 (the “LTC Trust”), for which Mr. Thomas M. Clay have shared votingis a trustee; and investment control.

(3)

Landon T.(ii) 2,759,400 Shares that are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding, currently exercisable warrants of Golden Queen held by the Clay Family 2009 Irrevocable Trust u/a dated April 14, 2009 (the “CF Trust” and, Harris Clay have shared voting and investment control of 2,451,269 Shares.

(4)

Landon T. Clay,together with the LTC Trust, the “Trusts”), for which Mr. Thomas M. Clay is a trustee and Harris Clay have shared votinghas a residual beneficial interest. The CF Trust holds a 50% beneficial interest of the Shares held by Arctic Coast, and investment control of 807,250 Shares.

(5)

Landon T. Clay andMr. Thomas M. Clay have shared votingtherefore disclaims beneficial ownership of 50% of the Shares held by Arctic Coast.

(6)Includes (i) 26,855,821 Shares held by EHT LLC and investment control of 10,000 Shares.

Mr. Jonathan Clay is a beneficiary; (ii) 3,683,413 Shares held directly by Mr. Jonathan Clay; and (iii) 185,000 Shares held by Milledge, LLC.

To the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Company, the directors and executive officers of the Company beneficially own the following Shares of the Company:

Name and AddressNumber of SharesApproximate % of
  Total Issued
Thomas M. Clay
Providence, RI, USA
9,904,483(2)(3)(4)(5)
9.9%
H. Lutz Klingmann
West Vancouver, BC, Canada
829,100
0.8%
Bryan A. Coates
Saint-Lambert, QC, Canada
50,000(1)
0.05%
Guy Le Bel
Repentigny, QC, Canada
50,000(1)
0.05%
Bernard Guarnera
Broomfield, CO, USA
75,000(1)
0.08%
Andrée St-Germain
Vancouver, BC, Canada
300,000(1)
0.3%
Laurence Morris
Mojave, CA, United States
300,000(1)
0.3%
All Directors and officers11,508,58311.53%

Name and Address Number of Shares  Approximate % of
Total Issued
 

Thomas M. Clay(1)

Boulder, CO, USA

  122,996,917(2)(3)  40.99%
Bryan A. Coates
Montreal, QC, Canada
  17,000(2)(4)  0.01%
Guy Le Bel
Repentigny, QC, Canada
  80,000(2)  0.03%
Bernard Guarnera
Las Vegas, NV, USA
  25,000(2)  0.01%
Paul M. Blythe
Collingwood, ON, Canada
  1,580,000(2)  0.53%
Robert Walish
Mojave, CA, USA
  Nil   Nil 
Brenda Dayton
Vancouver, BC, Canada
  Nil(2)  Nil 
All Directors and officers  124,698,917   41.55%

(1)

Thomas M. Clay resigned as Chairman of the Board, a director and Chief Executive Officer of Golden Queen on February 7, 2019. Mr. Clay will be reinstated as to such positions should the Transaction be terminated for any reason prior to closing.

(2)These amounts include beneficial ownership of securities not currently outstanding but which are reserved for immediate issuance on exercise of options. In particular, these amounts includeexclude Shares issuable upon exercise of options as follows: 50,000457,500 Shares issuable to Thomas M. Clay, 382,500 Shares issuable to Bryan A. Coates, 50,000882,501 Shares issuable to Guy Le Bel, 50,000382,500 Shares issuable to Bernard Guarnera, 300,000Guarnera,150,000 Shares issuable to Andrée St-Germain,Paul M. Blythe and 300,000220,000 Shares issuable to Laurence Morris.

Brenda Dayton.
(2)

Includes 7,281,553(3)

This amount excludes (i) 10,740,600 Shares reserved for immediate issuance onthat are issuable upon the exercise of convertible debenturesoutstanding, currently exercisable warrants of Golden Queen held by the LTC Trust, for which Landon T. Clay andMr. Thomas M. Clay have shared votingis a trustee; and investment control.

(3)

Landon T. Clay and Harris Clay have shared voting and investment control(ii) 2,759,400 Shares that are issuable upon the exercise of 2,451,269 Shares.

(4)

Landon T. Clay,outstanding, currently exercisable warrants of Golden Queen held by the CF Trust, for which Mr. Thomas M. Clay is a trustee and Harris Clay have shared voting and investment controlhas a residual beneficial interest.

(4)Excludes 8,500 Shares that are issuable upon the exercise of 807,250 Shares.

(5)

Landon T. Clay and Thomas M. Clay have shared voting and investment control of 10,000 Shares.

outstanding, currently exercisable warrants held by Bryan A. Coates.

PRIOR SALES

The following table sets forth, for the 12-monthtwelve month period prior to the date of this Proxy Statement,the Share Purchase Agreement, the prior sales of Shares and debt convertible into Shares, but excluding Shares sold pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options, warrants or conversion rights, the price at which such securities were issued, the number of securities issued and the date of which such securities were issued:rights:

Description of SecurityDate IssuedNumber of Securities
Issued
Price/Exercise Price
(C$)
Convertible debenture(1)July 26, 2013N/A1.03
Shares(2)February 28, 201415,3001.52

Description of Security Date Issued Number of Securities
Issued
  Price 
Shares(1) February 22, 2018  188,952,761  US$0.1325 

- 9 -



(1)

The Company issued convertible debentures for aggregate gross proceeds of C$10,000,000. The convertible debentures are unsecured and bear interest at 2% per annum, calculated on the outstanding principal balance, payable annually. The principal amounts of the notes are convertible into Shares at a price of C$1.03 per Share for a period of two years. If the notes have not been converted by the holders prior to the maturity date, then the Company may convert them at the lower of C$1.03 or the market price as at the maturity date. The market price on the maturity date will be determined based on the volume-weighted average price of the Shares traded on the TSX for the five trading days preceding the maturity date. An investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a director and insider of the Company, acquired C$7,500,000 of the convertible debentures, and Johnathan Clay, a member of the Clay Group, acquired the remaining C$2,500,000.

(2)

The Shares were issued in connection with mineral property interestspursuant to a rights offering. A total of 123,485,369 Shares were issued to members of the Company.

Clay family and associated entities.

DIVIDEND RECORD AND POLICY

The Company

Golden Queen has not declared or paid any dividends on the Shares in the two years prior to the date of this Proxy Statement, and has no current intention to declare a dividend. Any decision to pay dividends on the Shares in the future will be made by the Board on the basis of earnings, financial requirements, and other conditions existing at such future time.

TRADING PRICE AND VOLUME

The Shares are quoted on the OTCQX Best Market under the symbol GQMNF. The following table sets forth the price range and volume of shares as reported by the OTCQX Best Market for the periods indicated.

Month High (US$)  Low (US$)  Volume 
July 2018  0.1687   0.12   1,480,412 
August 2018  0.1409   0.1053   1,053,801 
September 2018  0.145   0.10279   1,813,878 
October 2018  0.13   0.0988   1,237,757 
November 2018  0.125   0.0812   759,763 
December 2018  0.10628   0.0701   2,781,052 
January 2019  0.095   0.0287   11,492,440 
February 2019  0.04   0.02   4,333,218 
March 2019  [♦]   [♦]   [♦] 
April 1 - [♦], 2019  [♦]   [♦]   [♦] 

On January 7, 2019, the trading date immediately preceding the announcement that Golden Queen had received a proposal letter regarding the Transaction, the closing price for the Shares on the OTCQX Best Market was US$0.094 per Share.

The Shares are listed on the TSX under the symbol GQM. The following table sets forth the price range and volume of Shares as reported by the TSX for the periods indicated.

MonthHigh (C$)Low (C$)Volume
December 20131.000.622,006,438
January 20141.460.801,447,636
February 20141.741.181,531,207
March 20141.991.571,949,062
April 20141.981.57977,819
May 20141.911.30651,881
June <> - <>, 2014<><><>

Month High (C$)  Low (C$)  Volume 
July 2018  0.215   0.16   725,733 
August 2018  0.18   0.14   953,888 
September 2018  0.185   0.14   1,236,320 
October 2018  0.17   0.135   576,164 
November 2018  0.155   0.11   916,229 
December 2018  0.15   0.10   656,143 
January 2019  0.135   0.045   6,518,280 
February 2019  0.06   0.025   10,951,100 
March 2019  [♦]   [♦]   [♦] 
April 1 - [♦], 2019  [♦]   [♦]   [♦] 

On June 6, 2014,January 7, 2019, the trading date immediately preceding the announcement ofthat Golden Queen had received a proposal letter regarding the Joint Venture,Transaction, the closing price for the Shares on the TSX was C$1.320.135 per Share.

The

Following the Transaction, the Shares will be delisted from the TSX and are also quotedexpected to be listed on the NEX Board of the TSX Venture Exchange. In addition, Golden Queen expects its listing on the OTCQX International Exchange under the symbol GQMNF. The following table sets forth the price range and volume of shares as reported by the OTCQX for the periods indicated.

MonthHigh (US$)Low (US$)Volume
December 20130.90420.5983,440,247
January 20141.330.752,220,521
February 20141.561.06252,709,007
March 20141.811.413,327,424
April 20141.791.422,413,918
May 20141.761.191,689,104
June <> - <>, 2014<><><>

On June 6, 2014, the trading date immediately preceding the announcementBest Market to be moved to a lower tier exchange of the Joint Venture, the closing price for the Shares on the OTCQX International Exchange was US$1.1687 per Share.OTC Markets Group Inc.

PROPOSAL: JOINT VENTURE FOR

18 

MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON AT THE MEETING

PROPOSAL 1: SALE OF THE SOLEDAD MOUNTAIN PROJECT

At

This section of the Meeting, shareholders will be asked to approveProxy Statement describes the proposed Joint Venture to develop and operateTransaction. Although we believe that the Soledad Project.

Parties todescription in this section covers the Joint Venture

Pursuant tomaterial terms of the Transaction, Agreement, the Company, GQ California, Gauss Holdings, Auvergne and Gauss have agreed to enter into the Joint Venture to develop and operate the Soledad Project.

- 10 -


The Company is developing the Soledad Project, a gold-silver, open pit, heap leach operation located just outside the town of Mojave in Kern County in southern California. See “About the Soledad Mountain Project” below for more detail. GQ California is a wholly-owned California subsidiarythis summary may not contain all of the Company which ownsinformation that is important to you. You should carefully read the Soledad Project. Pursuant toentire Proxy Statement for a more complete understanding of the Transactionproposed Transaction. The full text of the Share Purchase Agreement may be viewed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and SEDAR at www.sedar.com under the Companyfilings made by Golden Queen. Shareholders may also request a copy of the Share Purchase Agreement from Golden Queen free of charge. See the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Additional Information”.

Golden Queen has agreed to form a new California subsidiarysell 100% of the Company, GQ Holdco, and contribute allshares of GQM US to the outstanding stock of GQ California to GQ Holdco. The Company will also convert GQ California into a California limited liability company, will transfer all of GQ California’s debts and liabilities to GQ Holdco, and GQ Holdco will become the guarantor of certain loans currently guaranteed by GQ California.

Gauss Holdings is a Delaware limited liability company and an investment vehicle of Leucadia. Leucadia operates a merchant and investment banking platform that creates, acquires and owns a diversified group of businesses. Leucadia has subsidiaries, joint venture interests and investments in a range of businesses, including its largest wholly-owned subsidiary, Jefferies Group LLC (investment banking and securities), and its joint ventures, Jefferies Finance LLC (corporate lending) and Jefferies LoanCore LLC (commercial mortgage lending). Leucadia has a range of other investments in auto retail, beef processing, broadband communications, financial services, manufacturing, oil and gas, and real estate, and owns 20% of Harbinger Group Inc. Leucadia’s principal executive offices are located at 520 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, 10022, and its primary telephone number is (212) 460-1900.

Auvergne is a Delaware limited liability company and an investment vehicle of the Clay Group, who are long-term shareholders of the Company.Purchasers, which include Thomas M. Clay is also a director and insider of the Company. Auvergne’s principal executive offices are located at 10 Memorial Boulevard, Suite 902, Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, and its primary telephone number is (401) 490-0700.

Gauss Holdings and Auvergne formed Gauss, a Delaware limited liability company, for the purposes of investing in the Joint Venture. Gauss Holdings will contribute US$74,250,000 and Auvergne will contribute US$35,750,000 to Gauss, giving them 67.5% and 32.5% of the interests in Gauss, respectively.

Terms of the Joint Venture

Under the Transaction Agreement, the parties have agreed as follows:

- 11 -


On closing of the Joint Venture, the Company, GQ Holdco, GQ California and Gauss will enter into the JV Agreement regarding the operation of GQ California, which will contain the following terms:

- 12 -


If the Company conducts a rights offering, Gauss Holdings and Auvergne have agreed to backstop such offering pursuant to the Standby Commitment. Under the Standby Commitment, Gauss Holdings and Auvergne have agreed, subject to certain terms, conditions and limitations, and at the option of the Company, to purchase all or part of the Shares issuable pursuant to any rights that are unexercised by other holders of rights up to a maximum of US$45,000,000 in the aggregate at an exercise price equal to the lesser of (i) the price in United States currency at which the Shares are offered to holders of rights, or (ii) US$1.10 per Share. In consideration for providing the Standby Commitment, on closing of the Joint Venture, Gauss Holdings and Auvergne will be entitled to be paid a non-refundable fee in the aggregate amount of US$2,250,000. Members of the Clay Group whose votes are not entitled to be counted in obtaining the shareholder approval of the Joint Venture may choose to exercise their rights, transfer their rights or allow their rights to expire.

The Company has also entered into registration rights agreements (the “Registration Rights Agreements”) with Gauss Holdings, and with Auvergne, and certain members of the Clay family (Landon T. Clay, Thomas M. Clay, Harris Clay, Jonathan Clay, and Landon T. Clay 2013-4 Annuity Trust, collectivelyassociated entities, under the “Clay Shareholders”), pursuant to which the Company has agreed to register under United States securities laws, any Shares issued to Gauss Holdings, Auvergne or the Clay Shareholders pursuant to the Standby Commitment, as well as any Shares held by such parties on closingterms of the Joint Venture. Such registration will be atShare Purchase Agreement dated February 7, 2019, a copy of which was filed by Golden Queen as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K on EDGAR and as a material contract on SEDAR on February 11, 2019. GQM US currently holds a 50% interest in GQM LLC, the requestowner of Gauss Holdings, Auvergne or the Clay Shareholders, and the aggregate gross proceeds expected to be received by Gauss Holdings or by Auvergne and the Clay Shareholders from the sale of the Shares subject to such registration must be at least US$5,000,000.

The Company will consider alternate sources of funding, and the size of any possible rights offering would be decreased by the amount of any other financing received from other sources.

- 13 -


Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, closing of the Joint Venture is subject to:

The Company has made a submission to the TSX regarding the Joint Venture, and the provisions of the Proxy Statement relating to the resolution sought were reviewed and accepted by the TSX.

Corporate Structure

The corporate relationships between the Company, its subsidiaries and its100% interest in the Soledad Project before and after closingMountain Project. The interest of GQM US in GQM LLC is subject to potential dilution as a result of warrants of GQM LLC held by Gauss LLC, which warrants are described below under “Background to the Joint Venture are as follows:Transaction”.

- 14 -


About the Soledad Mountain Project

The Soledad Mountain Project is a gold-silver projectmine located approximately 5 miles south of the town of Mojave in Kern County, California. The Soledad Mountain Project will useuses conventional open pit mining methods and the cyanide heap leach and Merrill-Crowe processes to recover gold and silver from crushed, agglomerated ore. The Soledad Mountain Project is Golden Queen’s primary asset, and its sale represents the sale of all or substantially all of Golden Queen’s assets.

The following chart depicts the current corporate structure of Golden Queen, including its material subsidiaries and ownership of the Soledad Mountain Project, as well as Golden Queen’s joint venture partner in the Soledad Mountain Project. Following completion of the proposed Transaction, Golden Queen would have no subsidiaries.


Golden Queen’s principal executive offices are located at #2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 3X2, and its primary telephone number is 1-778-373-1557. The Purchaser’s principal executive offices are located at #300 – 70 Main Street, Peterborough, NH, 03458, and its primary telephone number is 1-603-371-9032.

Background to the Transaction

Despite the extensive efforts of our management and the Board, operations at the Soledad Mountain Project have not generated sufficient free cash flow to award dividends to Golden Queen and may require significant additional cash to continue. Golden Queen has been unable to attract sufficient capital to fund its own operations and GQM LLC, other than through loans and investment from members of the Clay family and associated entities (the “Clay Group”). Payments due under such loans have been extended but are coming due in the near future.

Members of the Clay Group have been involved with Golden Queen for many years. Thomas M. Clay was a director of Golden Queen since January 2009, Chairman of the Board since May 2013 and Chief Executive Officer since August 2015, and resigned prior to the signing of the Share Purchase Agreement. Members of the Clay Group have made significant investments in, and provided multiple loans to, Golden Queen in the past. In addition, 50% of GQM LLC is owned by Gauss LLC. 75.46% of Gauss LLC is owned by Gauss Holdings LLC (wholly-owned by Jefferies Financial Group), and the remaining 24.54% is owned by Auvergne LLC, an investment entity of the Clay Group.


Recent financing by members of the Clay Group included the Second Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement dated as of November 21, 2016, as amended (the “GQM Loan”). The GQM Loan for was a principal amount of US$31 million, due on May 21, 2019 with an annual interest rate of 8%, payable quarterly. In connection with the GQM Loan, Golden Queen issued 8,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable for a period of five years expiring November 21, 2021. In November 2017, Golden Queen and the Clay Group agreed to amend the GQM Loan by reducing the 2018 quarterly and 2019 first quarter principal payments from US$2.5 million to US$1 million, adding the reduction of such payments pro-rata to the remaining 2019 payments, and increasing the annual interest rate from 8% to 10% effective January 1, 2018. A payment of US$1.7 million under the GQM Loan was due on January 1, 2019 but was extended to February 1, 2019 and then further extended to February 8, 2019 to allow Golden Queen to avoid making any payments in the context of the eventual Transaction. Any payments under the GQM Loan have been further waived and postponed until after the Meeting in exchange for a fee of US$0.2 million with such fee to be added to the outstanding balance under the GQM Loan such that Golden Queen will make no further payments under the GQM Loan if the Shareholders approve the Transaction at the Meeting and all other conditions to closing as set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement are met.

In February 2018, Golden Queen completed a rights offering, which was backstopped by members of the Clay Group. The total number of Shares issued by Golden Queen under the rights offering was 188,952,761, for gross proceeds of approximately US$25 million. A total of 123,485,369 Shares, being 65.4% of the Shares issued in connection with the rights offering, were acquired by members of the Clay Group.

The Clay Group has also provided loans to GQM LLC, through Gauss LLC, to fund operation and development of the Soledad Mountain Project. In October 2018, GQM LLC entered into an agreement with Gauss Holdings LLC and Auvergne LLC (the “Lenders”) whereby the Lenders extended a revolving credit loan facility to GQM LLC (the “Facility”) in the amount of US$20 million. Under the terms of the agreement, the maturity date of the Facility is March 31, 2020 and the annual interest rate on drawn amounts is 8%. GQM LLC has made an initial US$5 million draw on the Facility. In connection with the Facility, the Lenders were issued 21,486 warrants (the “GQM LLC Warrants”), with each warrant entitling the holder to purchase a unit of GQM LLC for a period of five years at an exercise price of $475.384 per unit. The GQM LLC Warrants represent a fully-diluted 7.5% interest in the equity of GQM LLC. If the GQM LLC warrants are exercised, Golden Queen’s interest in GQM LLC will be diluted to 46.25% from the current 50%. The Facility is secured by a pledge of Golden Queen’s equity interest in GQM LLC.

The Board has from time to time separately engaged with the management of the Company in reviews and discussions of potential strategic alternatives for the Company, and has constantly been considering ways to enhance its performance and prospects. These reviews and discussions have focused on, among other things, the business environment facing the industry generally and the Company and its current and future liabilities in particular. These reviews have also included periodic discussions with respect to potential transactions that would further its strategic objectives and enhance shareholder value, and the potential benefits and risks of those transactions. The Company has been working with Maxit Capital LP (“Maxit”), a financial advisory boutique specializing in mergers and acquisitions in the mining sector, since 2011. Maxit’s role has included to explore possible transactions to generate value for the Company, including merger and acquisition opportunities, strategic investors, and sourcing third party debt for the Company.

During the period between September 2018 and January 4, 2019, Thomas M. Clay first engaged in discussions with the Board and the management of the Company regarding the existing indebtedness of the Company to the Clay Group and the impending debt payment deadlines under the GQM Loan. Mr. Clay informed the Board and the management of the Company that the Clay Group and its related entities would no longer extend the GQM Loan or provide further financing to the Company.

On January 4, 2019, Mr. Clay on behalf of the Purchasers, delivered a preliminary, non-binding proposal letter (the “Non-Binding Term Sheet”) to the Company detailing a proposal to acquire all of the Company’s interests in GQM LLC for a purchase price consisting mainly of the extinguishment of all indebtedness owing to the Purchasers under the GQM Loan, the surrender of all Shares, warrants and options of the Company held by the Purchasers for cancellation and a cash payment of $3 million. The Non-Binding Term Sheet also included a 30-day go-shop period among other terms. The Non-Binding Term Sheet was subsequently filed on EDGAR on January 7, 2019 and a corresponding news release and early warning report were filed on SEDAR on January 7, 2019 by the Purchasers.

On January 11, 2019, the Board formed the Special Committee along with a special committee mandate and appointed Paul Blythe, Bryan Coates and Bernard Guarnera, all being independent directors of the Company, and retained independent legal counsel to advise the Company and the Special Committee of its rights and obligations in connection with the Non-Binding Term Sheet.


Following the initial meeting the Special Committee outlined a counter proposal to the Purchasers providing for a significant increase in the cash component of the purchase price as well as a number of other provisions for the benefit of the Company post-transaction. At the same time, the Special Committee directed management of the Company to engage with Maxit on specific steps to be taken to identify alternatives to the proposal from the Purchasers and alternative avenues of financing that could be pursued to replace the indebtedness held by the Purchasers. The Purchasers rejected the Company’s counter proposal, but discussions continued between representatives of the two groups. Over the course of the following four weeks, the Special Committee met a total of 7 times.

During the course of the Special Committee meetings, Mr. Blythe was appointed chair of the committee and the members discussed all available alternatives and the results of the ongoing discussions between the Company and the Purchasers. Independent legal counsel was asked to advise on the legal considerations relevant to the discussions with input from regular company counsel as well as US counsel to the Company. The Special Committee received advice on the avenues available to the Company if it were to pursue a proceeding under either Canadian or US insolvency protections in order to secure further time to identify alternative transactions. During this period of time, Maxit worked with the Company to reach out to entities that had historically shown interest in transacting with the Company, and fielded numerous inbound inquiries from parties that had become aware of the public announcement of the proposal from the Purchasers. During this period contact was made with over 30 parties by the Company or its advisors. In parallel to these discussions, the Company retained EY on January 18, 2019 to begin work in support of an eventual Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion in the event that an alternative transaction was not identified.

On January 30, 2019, the Special Committee met with Canadian and US legal counsel to the Company, independent counsel to the Special Committee, Maxit and EY to review the status of negotiations with the Purchasers, to receive an update on Maxit’s work to identify alternatives to the proposal from the Purchasers and to hear EY’s Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion. At the conclusion of this discussion the Special Committee determined that a formal proposal to the Purchasers should be made. The formal proposal was delivered to counsel to the Purchasers and was not accepted, as a result of which discussions continued for several more days until on February 5 an agreement was reached on the material terms of the transaction to be pursued including a longer go shop period, a lower break fee payable by the Company in the event of a Superior Proposal during the go shop period, the addition of the contingent payment and an increase in the cash component payable to the Company by the Purchasers. The agreed upon material terms were reflected in a final letter of intent (the “Final Letter of Intent”).

Mr. Clay resigned as Golden Queen’s Chief Executive Officer and from the board of directors and all managerial positions with Golden Queen, Golden Queen Mining Canada Ltd. (“GQM Canada”) and GQM US, as applicable, prior to entering into the Share Purchase Agreement. As such, the members of the Special Committee constituted all of the directors of the Company and the recommendation and approval of the members of the Special Committee represented the recommendation and approval of the Board.

Having undertaken a thorough review of, and carefully considered, information concerning the Transaction and the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion from EY and after consulting with its financial and legal advisors, the Special Committee unanimously determined that the Transaction is advisable and is in the best interests of, the Company, and adopted and declared advisable the Transaction, authorized the entering into of the Final Letter of Intent and the Share Purchase Agreement to be settled based on the Final Letter of Intent, and recommended that the Shareholders vote FOR the Transaction Resolution.

On February 5, 2019, the Final Letter of Intent was filed on EDGAR and a corresponding news release was disseminated on the same day.

Through and until February 7, 2019, the Company, the Purchasers and their legal counsels worked to finalize the Share Purchase Agreement and related documents based on the Final Letter of Intent. The Share Purchase Agreement was executed by the Purchasers and the Company later that day and a news release relating thereto was disseminated.

Following execution of the Share Purchase Agreement, the Company worked with Maxit to ensure that all interested parties that could be considered alternatives to the Transaction were again contacted and made aware of the specific terms of the transaction. Paul Blythe, as chair of the Special Committee met weekly with management and Maxit to monitor progress and provide input.

22 

Terms of the Transaction

Pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to sell to the Purchasers all of the issued and outstanding common shares of GQM US (the “GQM US Shares”), a corporation existing under the laws of the State of California, which owns 50% of the outstanding units of GQM LLC, a limited liability company existing under the laws of the State of California, which owns a 100% interest in the Soledad Mountain Project. GQM US is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company through GQM Canada.

The description of the Share Purchase Agreement is qualified in its entirety by the description set forth in the Form 8-K

filed on EDGAR by Golden Queen on February 11, 2019 and a copy of the Share Purchase Agreement attached as Exhibit 10.1 thereto. The Share Purchase Agreement was also filed on SEDAR along with a material change report on

February 11, 2019.

The Purchasers include the following:

(a)The Landon T. Clay 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated March 6, 2009, EHT, LLC, and the Clay Family 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated April 14, 2009 (the “Purchasers by Loan”) who are lenders to Golden Queen pursuant to the GQM Loan;

(b)Estate of Landon T. Clay, Monadnock Charitable Annuity Lead Trust, Thomas M. Clay, Arctic Coast Petroleums Ltd., EHT, LLC, Jonathan Clay, 933 Milledge, LLC, James Clay, Lavinia Clay, Lavinia Clay – IRA, Cassius M.C. Clay, Landon H. Clay and Richard T. Clay (the “Purchasers by Shares”) who hold Shares of Golden Queen; and

(c)Two Clay family entities, to be determined (the “Purchasers by Cash”).

The aggregate purchase price payable by the Purchasers to Golden Queen for the GQM US Shares (collectively, the “Consideration”) will be as follows:

(a)the Purchasers by Cash shall pay US$4,250,000 to the Company;

(b)the Purchasers by Shares shall tender and exchange all Shares legally and beneficially held by the Purchasers by Shares to the Company for cancellation, being 177,701,229 Shares having a total value of US$6,308,394 based on the VWAP of the Shares on the OTCQX Best Market for the 20 trading days ended February 7, 2019 of US$0.0355;

(c)the Purchasers by Shares shall tender and exchange all stock options to purchase Shares (“GQM Options”) held by the Purchasers by Shares to the Company for cancellation, being 457,500 GQM Options having de minimis value;

(d)the Purchasers by Loan shall tender and exchange all principal, interest and applicable fees due under the GQM Loan to the Company for cancellation, having a value of approximately US$26,600,000 as at February 7, 2019; and

(e)the Purchasers by Loan shall tender and exchange all common share purchase warrants (the “GQM Warrants”) held by the Purchasers by Loan to the Company for cancellation, being 18,000,000 GQM Warrants having a value of approximately US$32,000 as at January 31, 2019.

The Consideration payable by the Purchasers totals approximately US$37,200,000, calculated as at February 7, 2019. See Schedules A, B, C and D of the Share Purchase Agreement for a break down and additional detail regarding the calculation of the Consideration. The Purchasers shall acquire only the GQM US Shares and not any other assets of Golden Queen or any subsidiary and shall not assume or be liable for any debt or other liabilities of Golden Queen or any subsidiary of Golden Queen (except for the GQM Loan).


The Share Purchase Agreement provides for an additional payment to be made to Golden Queen in certain circumstances. If at any time prior to June 30, 2020, (a) the Purchasers sell, transfer or assign the GQM US Shares; (b) GQM US sells, transfers or assigns its 50% ownership interest in GQM LLC; or (c) GQM LLC sells, transfers or assigns its interest in the Soledad Mountain Project, for net proceeds greater than US$55,000,000 (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances) then the Purchasers may be required to make a payment to the Company (the “Contingent Payment”). The Contingent Payment will be an amount equal to 20% of such excess proceeds, calculated in accordance with Schedule E of the Share Purchase Agreement. No Contingent Payment will be due as a result of any transaction among members of the Purchasers or their affiliates or as a result of any internal reorganization of the Purchasers or their affiliates.

The Share Purchase Agreement also includes a “go shop” right (the “Go-Shop Right”), which provides that, during the period from February 7, 2019 until April 1, 2019 (the “Go-Shop Period”) Golden Queen was entitled to actively solicit proposals or participate in discussions or negotiations with third parties with respect to an offer to acquire or purchase all of the Shares or substantially all of the assets of Golden Queen, GQM Canada or GQM US (an “Acquisition Proposal”) which the Board could reasonably determine, after consultation with outside financial and legal advisors, would result in a transaction that was more favorable, from a financial point of view, to the Shareholders than the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement (a “Superior Proposal”). Before Golden Queen could accept an Acquisition Proposal, certain requirements must have been met, including but not limited to: (i) the Board determining that the Acquisition Proposal constituted a Superior Proposal; (ii) Golden Queen providing the Purchasers with notice and all documentation concerning the Superior Proposal; and (iii) Golden Queen terminating the Share Purchase Agreement and paying the Purchasers a termination fee of US$1,000,000. The Go-Shop Right provided the Purchasers the right, but not the obligation, to amend the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement, including to increase the Consideration, in response to an Acquisition Proposal, and if the Purchasers’ amendments resulted in the Acquisition Proposal no longer being a Superior Proposal to the Share Purchase Agreement, Golden Queen would be obliged to enter into the amended Share Purchase Agreement with the Purchasers.

Upon the expiry of the Go-Shop Period, Golden Queen or any of its representatives or shareholders are prohibited from soliciting alternative offers or engaging in discussions or negotiations with respect to or in connection with any possible sale of GQM US, GQM Canada or GQM US’s indirect ownership of the Soledad Mountain Project (an “Alternative Transaction”). Golden Queen is to immediately provide written notice to the Purchasers of receipt of any proposal for an Alternative Transaction or any requests for information or access to the properties, books or records relating to Golden Queen, GQM US, GQM Canada or the Soledad Mountain Project by a person who has informed Golden Queen that such person is considering making, or has made, a proposal for an Alternative Transaction.

The Share Purchase Agreement also includes customary representations and warranties of both Golden Queen and the Purchasers. Golden Queen provides covenants under the Share Purchase Agreement in respect of the conduct of GQM US, primarily that during the interim period, Golden Queen will cause GQM US to operate its business in the ordinary course of business in compliance with applicable law and consistent with past practice.

The obligation to complete the Transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the following:

(a)the Transaction must be approved by (a) ⅔ of the votes cast on the resolution, and (b) a simple majority of the votes cast on such resolution by the Shareholders, excluding votes cast by Shareholders that are required to be excluded pursuant to applicable securities laws and the policies of the TSX;

(b)all other consents and regulatory approvals necessary for the completion of the Transaction shall have been obtained, including approval of the TSX;

(c)Golden Queen shall have obtained a withholding certificate pursuant to the U.S. Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in respect of GQM US (“Withholding Certificate”);

(d)Golden Queen shall have completed a corporate reorganization for tax purposes, whereby Golden Queen shall amalgamate with its wholly-owned subsidiary GQM Canada, and settle the intercorporate debt owed by GQM US by capitalizing such amount to GQM US;

(e)notices of dissent shall not have been delivered to Golden Queen by Shareholders holding greater than 5% of the outstanding Shares; and

(f)satisfaction of various other closing conditions customary for a transaction of this nature.

The Share Purchase Agreement may be terminated in the following circumstances on or prior to the closing date: (i) by the mutual written agreement of Golden Queen and the Purchasers; (ii) by either Golden Queen or the Purchasers if any closing conditions specified in the Share Purchase Agreement are not satisfied by closing; (iii) by Golden Queen upon accepting an Acquisition Proposal and paying the Purchasers a $1,000,000 termination fee, in accordance with the Go-Shop Right; (iv) and by either Golden Queen or the Purchasers if closing has not occurred before the outside date specified in the Share Purchase Agreement, or such later date as mutually agreed upon between the parties. With regard to the condition to closing to obtain the Withholding Certificate, the Share Purchase Agreement provides that, at or before the time of closing, if approval of the Shareholders of the Transaction Resolution has been obtained but Golden Queen has not received the Withholding Certificate from the IRS and Golden Queen does not foresee any unreasonable cause for further delay of receipt of the Withholding Certificate, then the Purchasers and Golden Queen will agree to extend the outside date specified in the Share Purchase Agreement and delay closing to a reasonable date to allow time for receipt of such Withholding Certificate.

The Company has received conditional approval of the Transaction from the TSX, and the provisions of the Proxy Statement relating to the resolution sought were reviewed and accepted by the TSX, but there is focusedno guarantee that the Transaction will receive final approval from the TSX.

The Transaction, if approved by the Shareholders and if all other conditions to closing and actions to be taken at closing set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement are met, completed or where applicable, waived, is expected to close on advancingor before May 21, 2019.

Shareholders are advised to consult the Soledad Projectfull text of the Share Purchase Agreement, which may be viewed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and SEDAR at www.sedar.com under the filings made by Golden Queen.

Effect of the Transaction

If the Transaction is completed, we will no longer have a mining property. Golden Queen will have no material assets and no active business, but intends to production. Construction is being donerestructure its affairs and pursue new business opportunities. Golden Queen does not intend to liquidate following the Transaction. We will remain a reporting issuer in three phases, with Phase I having started in July 2013,the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and Phase II construction having commenced in 2014. The Company’s focus in 2013 wasthe United States. We intend to apply to list on the basic infrastructureNEX board of the Soledad Project. This included wideningTSX Venture Exchange and expect our listing on the OTCQX Best Market to be moved to a lower tier exchange of Silverthe OTC Markets Group Inc.

The Board will evaluate alternatives for the use of the cash proceeds to be received at closing, which alternatives are expected to include using a portion of the proceeds to pursue strategic opportunities, including, without limitation, acquisition of another mining property, and to pay transaction and other expenses. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures, however, will depend upon numerous factors, and we may find it necessary or advisable to use portions of the proceeds from the Transaction for different or presently non-contemplated purposes.

The Transaction will not alter the rights, privileges or nature of the issued and outstanding Shares. A Shareholder, other than the Purchasers, who holds Shares immediately prior to the closing of the Transaction, will continue to hold the same number of Shares immediately following the closing, however the number of Shares may subsequently be adjusted if Golden Queen Roadcompletes the Consolidation. See “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 2: Share Consolidation” in this Proxy Statement.

Reasons for the Transaction

The Special Committee and adding turning lanes, a dip-crossing across a flood plain, initial site gradingBoard carefully considered all aspects of the Transaction, and received advice from Maxit, EY, and legal counsel. The Special Committee evaluated strategic alternatives, reviewed and reported on proposed transactions and carried out negotiations in good faith on behalf of the Company with access roads and a parking lot which has now been paved, extensive site drainage work,regards to the proposed sale of GQM US. In recommending the Transaction, the Special Committee and the overland conveyor route. The Company also backfilledBoard considered and evaluated a number of vertical shafts as a safety measure. Detailed engineering continued in 2013.factors, including:


·Avoids Bankruptcy and Insolvency Proceedings.Without ongoing funding from the Purchasers, the Company would be unable to repay its debts as they come due. The Transaction will allow the Company to eliminate all indebtedness owed to the Purchasers. The Transaction resolves Golden Queen’s going concern issue and the possibility of entering into bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings by eliminating all outstanding debt payable by Golden Queen, including a scheduled debt repayment on February 8, 2019, and additional payments due in April and May 2019.

The first of the key projects commenced in 2014 was the construction of the workshop-warehouse. The workshop-warehouse is targeted for completion in July, and construction of the water supply infrastructure is underway. In addition, site grading of the area where the crushing-screening plant will be constructed was completed in May, and detailed engineering also continued in 2014. The Company engaged a core group of managers for the Soledad Project all based in Mojave in 2014.

·Review of Strategic Alternatives. The belief of the Special Committee and Board, after consultation with Golden Queen’s financial and legal advisors and management, and after review of the other strategic opportunities reasonably available to Golden Queen, including the possibility of not engaging in the Transaction and pursuing insolvency proceedings, in each case taking into account the potential benefits, risks and uncertainties associated with those other opportunities, that the Transaction represents Golden Queen’s best and most certain prospect for continuing in the current economic environment.

The commitment to the Phase III items, which includes a number of major projects such as the crushing-screening plant, Merrill-Crowe plant, assay laboratory, conveying and stacking system, the Phase I heap leach pad and the power supply, will depend upon closing of the Joint Venture. Pre-production mining is expected to start early in 2015, with the timeline for the remaining construction being 15 to 18 months from the date of this Proxy Statement. Commissioning of the facilities should therefore be feasible in the fourth quarter of 2015 with the start of production shortly thereafter.

·Value to Shareholders. The Special Committee and Board have concluded that the value offered to Shareholders under the Share Purchase Agreement is more favorable than the value that might have been realized by pursuing other opportunities. Given the challenges that the Company has had in obtaining financing in the past few years, the Transaction was deemed to be a superior alternative which will allow Shareholders to realize the value of its assets.

As noted above, Gauss will contribute US$110,000,000 to the Joint Venture. These funds will be used to continue to develop the Soledad Project.

·Future Prospects of Golden Queen.Despite the extensive efforts of management and the Board, the Company has been unable to secure sufficient capital in order to fund its operations. The Transaction provides a meaningful cash treasury to assess various options to provide or return value to Shareholders going forward. After closing of the Transaction, the Company will apply to list on the NEX board of the TSX Venture Exchange in order to restructure its affairs and pursue new opportunities.

Reasons for the Joint Venture

·Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion. The receipt of the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, subsequently confirmed by the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion, from EY that, as of the date thereof, and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications contained therein, the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Shareholders, other than the Purchasers.

The Joint Venture will provide the Company with the funds required to develop and operate the Soledad Project. Construction of infrastructure has been underway since July 2013, and the Joint Venture will provide the funds to continue that development.

·Improved Ownership by Minority Shareholders.Eliminates the Purchasers’ majority ownership position, materially increasing retained ownership by remaining Shareholders.

·Lower Operating Costs.Decreases administrative expenses for the Company following closing of the Transaction.

·Status of the Soledad Mountain Project. The Special Committee considered the further development required of the Soledad Mountain Project, the uncertain and unpredictable nature of the mining industry, the volatility of gold and silver prices, increases in operational and development costs among other factors that would impact Golden Queen’s ability to realize profit from the Soledad Mountain Project in the foreseeable future.

·Capital Contribution. The Special Committee considered the significant capital contributions needed to be made by Golden Queen under a joint venture agreement with respect to the Soledad Mountain Project and Golden Queen’s lack of cash resources and financing opportunities to be able to fund such additional capital.

·Ability to Solicit Alternative Proposals. The Share Purchase Agreement allowed Golden Queen to continue to solicit, initiate, encourage and participate in discussions regarding competing proposals to the Transaction, until April 1, 2019. In addition, the Board had the right to terminate the Share Purchase Agreement to accept a superior proposal, subject to payment of a US$1M termination fee.

·Shareholder Approvals Required.The Transaction requires approval of ⅔ of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution, and a majority of the votes cast on the Transaction Resolution by the Shareholders, excluding votes cast by the Purchasers, meaning that Shareholders who do not have an interest in the Transaction are provided with the opportunity to vote for or against the Transaction.

·Contingent Payment. The Share Purchase Agreement provides for a contingent payment to Golden Queen if the Soledad Mountain Project is subsequently sold or transferred to a third party in certain circumstances.

·Dissent Rights. Registered Shareholders who oppose the Transaction may, upon compliance with certain conditions, exercise dissent rights and demand to be paid an amount equal to the fair value of their Shares determined immediately prior to the passing of the Transaction Resolution (described below under “Dissent Rights”).

·Ability to Change Recommendation to Shareholders. The Special Committee noted that subject to certain limitations set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement, if the Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsels and financial advisor and in response to any development, change, event, effect, occurrence or circumstance that does not relate to a superior alternative proposal and is not known as at the date of the Share Purchase Agreement, the Board may make a change in recommendation to the Shareholders.

·Termination Fees. The Special Committee considered the termination fee of US$1 million to be paid to Purchasers if the Share Purchase Agreement is terminated upon the entry into an alternative transaction. The Special Committee believed that a termination fee of this size for the Transaction would not, in and of itself, unduly deter a third party from making a superior alternative proposal or inhibit the Board from evaluating, negotiating and, if appropriate, terminating the Share Purchase Agreement and approving a superior alternative proposal.

·Remedies Available to the Company and Termination Rights. The Special Committee noted the Company could terminate the Share Purchase Agreement if the Purchasers were to breach or fail to perform any of the representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the Share Purchase Agreement, which breach has prevented or would prevent the satisfaction of certain of the condition to the Closing, and that the Company could terminate the Share Purchase Agreement to enter into a superior alternative transaction subject to the payment of a termination fee.

·Likelihood of Consummation. The Special Committee considered the likelihood that the Transaction would be completed, including its belief that there would not be regulatory impediments to the Transaction.

The Special Committee and the Board also considered various sourcesa variety of funding,risk factors concerning the Transaction, including, but not limited to:

·Loss of Opportunity. If the Transaction is completed, Golden Queen will no longer participate in the future development or benefit from the Soledad Mountain Project. As a result, the Transaction will eliminate the opportunity for Shareholders to participate in the long term potential benefits of the Soledad Mountain Project, to the extent those benefits exceed the potential benefits reflected in the Consideration. In addition, the Soledad Mountain Project is Golden Queen’s only mineral property and there is no guarantee the Company will be successful in finding new opportunities or obtaining additional financing to fund future operations.

·Failure to Complete the Transaction. The risks and costs to Golden Queen if the Transaction is not completed, including (i) all amounts owing under the GQM Loan will become immediately due and payable, (ii) the potentially adverse effect on Golden Queen’s trading price and the market’s perception of Golden Queen’s prospects, (iii) diversion of management and employee attention, potential employee attrition and the potential disruptive effect on business relationships, and (iv) the payment of our expenses associated with the Transaction.

·Limits on Pursuing Alternatives.The Share Purchase Agreement provided for a US$1 million termination fee payable by Golden Queen if the Share Purchase Agreement was terminated in certain circumstances prior to April 1, 2019, which may have discouraged other bidders. However, the Special Committee believed that the termination fee was customary and reasonable and would not unduly preclude a third party from making a superior proposal in accordance with the Share Purchase Agreement. Subsequent to April 1, 2019, the Share Purchase Agreement prohibits Golden Queen from entertaining competing proposals to the Transaction.

·Closing Conditions. The fact that completion of the Transaction requires the satisfaction of closing conditions that are not within our control. This includes receipt of approvals from the Shareholders and the TSX, and the receipt of the Withholding Certificate. There can be no certainty that these conditions will be satisfied or, if satisfied, when they will be satisfied.

·Downgrading of Stock Exchange Listing.Following the Transaction, the Company may no longer meet the listing requirements of the TSX. The Shares are expected to be listed on the NEX Board of the TSX Venture Exchange and a lower tier exchange of the OTC Markets Group Inc. However, there can be no assurance such listings will be obtained or maintained, or that an active liquid market for the Shares will develop or be sustained. Investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of a trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity and decreased analyst coverage of our securities.

·Other Risks.See “Risk Factors” in this Proxy Statement.

The foregoing summary of the information and factors considered by the Special Committee and the Joint Venture provides a low-risk, equity-based capital structureBoard is not intended to be exhaustive. In view of the variety of factors and the amount of information considered in connection with no hedgingits evaluation of the Transaction, the Special Committee and nothe Board did not find it practical to, and did not, quantify or otherwise attempt to assign any relative weighting to each specific factor considered in reaching its conclusions and recommendations. The Special Committee’s and the Board's recommendations were made after considering all of the above-noted factors, in light of the Special Committee’s and Board's knowledge of the business, financial covenants. In addition,condition and prospects of Golden Queen.

Recommendation of the Special Committee

After careful consideration, and taking into account the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, consultation with its financial and legal advisors, and such matters as it includes Leucadia, a well-respected and credible long-term partner with a history of successful investmentsconsidered relevant (as described above under “Reasons for the Transaction”) the Special Committee unanimously determined that the Transaction, as proposed in the mining sector. ItShare Purchase Agreement, is also supported byin the Clay Group, long-term shareholders who have supportedbest interests of Golden Queen and recommended the CompanyBoard approve the Transaction, and recommend that Shareholders vote for over 20 years, showing their dedicationthe Transaction Resolution.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board received the recommendation of the Special Committee, and took into account the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, consultation with its financial and legal advisors, as well as such matters as it considered relevant (as described above under “Reasons for the Transaction”) the Board determined that the Transaction, as proposed in the Share Purchase Agreement, is in the best interests of Golden Queen and approved the entering into of the Share Purchase Agreement.The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the Transaction Resolution.

The full Board was present at the meeting at which the Share Purchase Agreement was approved, and the Board was unanimous in its recommendations. Prior to the Companyexecution of the Share Purchase Agreement, Mr. Thomas M. Clay resigned as Chairman of the Board and as Golden Queen’s Chief Executive Officer and from the Soledad Project.board of directors and all managerial positions with Golden Queen, GQM Canada and GQM US, as applicable.

Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion

Maxit Capital prepared

This section is subject to change based on the preparation of the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion each dated effective as of June 7, 2014, forreferred to in this Proxy Statement, which will be completed after April 1, 2019, upon the Special Committee. Copiestermination of the fullGo-Shop Period.

The Special Committee engaged EY to prepare and deliver the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion are attachedwith respect to the Transaction. Prior to Golden Queen entering into the Share Purchase Agreement, EY provided the Special Committee with the Preliminary Valuation and Fairness Opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing in the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion on[♦], 2019.

A summary of the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion is included below. The full Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion will be filed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and SEDAR at www.sedar.com under the filings made by Golden Queen on or about[♦], 2019. Shareholders may also request a copy of the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion from Golden Queen free of charge. See the section of this Proxy Statement as Schedule A and Schedule B, respectively.entitled “Additional Information”. Shareholders are urged to read both these documents carefullythe Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion in theirits entirety, especially with regard to the assumptions and limitations contained in those documents. Thisthat document. The following summary is qualified by the information contained in the attachedFormal Valuation and Fairness Opinion.


QualificationsIn connection with the proposed Transaction, within the context of the requirements of MI 61-101, EY has prepared valuation under MI 61-101 and Independence of Maxit Capital

Maxit Capital is an independent advisory firm with expertise in mergers and acquisitions.a corresponding fairness opinion. The opinions expressed in theFormal Valuation and Fairness Opinion aredated and effective as of April[♦], 2019 (the “Valuation Date”) has been prepared for the opinions of Maxit Capital,Special Committee. The Formal Valuation and the form and content was approved for release by its managing partners, each of whom is experienced in merger, acquisition, divestiture, and valuation matters.

Neither Maxit Capital, nor any of its affiliates, is an insider, associate or affiliate (as those terms are defined in theSecurities Act (Ontario) or the rules made thereunder) of the Company, Leucadia, Gauss Holdings, the Clay Group, Auvergne or Gauss, or any of their respective associates or affiliates (collectively, the “Interested Parties”). Maxit CapitalFairness Opinion has not been engagedprepared to provide any financial advisory services, nor has it participated in any financings involving the Interested Parties within the past two years, other than acting as financial advisor to the Special Committee in connection with the Joint Venture. There are no other understandings, agreements or commitments between Maxit Capital and any of the Interested Parties with respect to any current or future business dealings which would be material to the Valuation or Fairness Opinion. Maxit Capital may in the ordinary course of business provide financial advisory, investment banking, or other financial services to one or more of the Interested Parties from time to time.

- 15 -


Engagement of Maxit Capital

Maxit Capital was retainedinformation for consideration by the Special Committee by letter agreement dated January 11, 2014. Maxit Capital was retained to act as the Special Committee’s financial advisor in connection with evaluating a joint venture to finance the construction of the Soledad Project. Pursuant to its engagement, Maxit Capital prepared the Valuation with respect to the valuationproposed Transaction, but does not constitute a recommendation to any party as to any course of GQ Californiaaction they might take. Despite any conclusions reached by EY, the circumstances of individual shareholders will necessarily determine what course of action they will take in responding to the proposed Transaction.

Qualifications of EY

EY is one of the largest global professional service firms, providing assurance, tax, transaction and the interestadvisory services. EY’s global transaction services include: valuations and fairness opinions, corporate finance and merger & acquisition advisory, transaction diligence and integration, transaction tax advisory, and corporate restructuring.

The conclusion expressed in the Joint Venture to be acquired by Gauss, and the Fairness Opinion with respect to whether the consideration to be received by the Company pursuant to the Joint Venture is fair from a financial point of view to the Company.

Maxit Capital was paid a cash fee for theFormal Valuation and Fairness Opinion which fee was not contingent upon the conclusions reachedis that of EY, including approval by a committee of senior EY practitioners, experienced in theproviding valuation and fairness opinions, merger & acquisition advisory services, and other corporate transaction services.

Independence of EY

EY has developed its Formal Valuation orand Fairness Opinion or on the completionbasis of an independent review and analysis of Golden Queen.

EY is independent of all parties to the Joint Venture. The Company also reimbursed Maxit Capital for its reasonable out-of-pocket expensesproposed Transaction in accordance with securities regulatory requirements and agreed to indemnify Maxit Capital in respect of certain liabilities that might arise out of the engagement.EY’s professional standards:

·Over the past three years EY's services to Leucadia National Corp. (an entity related to Jefferies Financial Group Inc.) have been limited to non-audit services that are not a conflict under MI 61-101 or EY's independence policies.

·No services were provided to Golden Queen, Jonathan Clay, Thomas M. Clay, Harris Clay, The Landon T. Clay 2009 Irrevocable Trust, or Auvergne LLC during the past three years.

·EY has no financial interest in Golden Queen or in the outcome of the proposed Transaction.

·EY has not conducted a prior valuation of Golden Queen, as determined in accordance with applicable securities regulations. There are no understandings or agreements between EY and Golden Queen or its associates or affiliates, with respect to future business dealings.

·EY’s fees are not contingent of the completion of the proposed Transaction or the conclusions expressed in the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion.

·There are no understandings or agreements between EY and Golden Queen or its associates or affiliates, with respect to future business dealings.

Scope of Review

In connection with preparingdeveloping the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion, Maxit Capital reviewedEY had discussions with the Special Committee and management of Golden Queen, and relied upon various sources ofon information as set out in the “Scope of Review” section of both the Valuationdeemed to be relevant and Fairness Opinion, andobtained from these general procedures, without independent verification, which included, among other things:others:

1.

the agreements related to the Joint Venture;

certain internal financial, operating, corporate and other information prepared or provided by or on behalf of theCompany;

internal management forecasts, development and operating projections, estimates (including future estimates of mineable resources) and budgets prepared or provided by or on behalfReview of the Company;

discussions with managementterms of the Company, as well as Leucadia, Gauss Holdings,proposed Transaction.


2.Understanding the Clay Group, Auvergnebusiness of Golden Queen, including review of certain business and Gauss;

financial information, including Golden Queen life of mine plan.

3.Review of historical annual audited financial statements and interim financial statements of Golden Queen.

4.

public informationDiscussions with Golden Queen management.

5.Value analyses relating to the Company, selected public companiesSoledad Mountain Project, GQM LLC, GQM US, and precedent transactions;

the Shares.

6.

various equity research reports;

a certificate from two senior officersValue analyses of the Company asassets and interests involved in the Transaction.

7.Review of historical trading prices of the Shares.

8.Review of various background materials concerning Golden Queen’s business, debt and equity financing efforts by Golden Queen, including efforts of Maxit during the Go-Shop Period.

9.Review of a range of economic, investment, stock and commodity market trading, and acquisition transaction data in the process of developing factors and rates of return relevant to assessing fairness from a financial point of view.

10.Preparation of a Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion.

11.Assessing fairness, from a financial point of view, of the proposed Transaction to the completeness and accuracy ofShareholders, other than the information provided to Maxit Capital; and

such other information, investigations, analyses and discussions (including discussions with the Company’s external legal counsel, and other third parties) as Maxit Capital considered necessary or appropriate in the circumstances.

Purchasers.

To the knowledge of the management and directors of the Company, Maxit Capital was not denied access by the Company to any material information it requested specifically regarding the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including GQ California.

- 16 -


Assumptions and Limitations

In preparing

EY has relied upon the completeness, accuracy and fair presentation of all of the financial and other information obtained from public sources, and from Golden Queen management for purposes of developing the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion.

Based on representations from Golden Queen management, EY has assumed that there are no material changes in the financial position or operating results for Golden Queen from the date of the most recently available financial statements, December 31, 2018, to the Valuation Date.

The Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion Maxit Capital made certain assumptionshas been prepared for the specific purpose identified above and imposed certain limitations as set outis not to be used in any other context without the “Assumptions and Limitations” sectionexpress written consent of both theEY. The Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion is developed as of a specific date on the basis of identifiable information and EY has not undertaken to update it to any other date. Should information relevant to the valuation conclusions become available to EY subsequent to the date of its conclusion, EY reserves the right, but will be under no obligation, to revise its opinion.

In completing the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion, EY made numerous assumptions with respect to economic, industry, and company performance and expectations that are matters over which included, among other things:

an assumption as to the completeness, accuracy and fair presentation of all financial and other information, data, advice, opinions and representations obtained by Maxit Capital from public sources, or provided to Maxit Capital by the Company or its affiliates or advisors or otherwise obtained by Maxit Capital pursuant to its engagement;
an assumption as to the accuracy and fair presentation of the audited financial statements of the Company and the reports of the auditors thereon and the interim unaudited financial statements of the Company, which were relied on by Maxit Capital;
an assumption that the forecasts, projections, estimates or budgets relied upon in its financial analyses were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the most reasonable assumptions, estimates and judgments of management of the Company, having regard to the Company’s business, plans, financial condition and prospects;
the limitation that Maxit Capital provides no opinion concerning any legal, tax or accounting matters concerning the Joint Venture or the sufficiency of the Valuation or Fairness Opinion for the Company’s purposes;
the limitation that the Valuation and Fairness Opinion were based on securities markets, economic and general business and financial conditions prevailing as at the close of business on June 5, 2014 and the conditions and prospects, financial and otherwise, of the Company and the other parties to the Joint Venture as they were reflected in the information provided to Maxit Capital;
numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, markets and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of any party involved in the Joint Venture;
the limitation that the valuation was provided for the use of the Special Committee in considering the Joint Venture and is not intended to be, and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company with respect to the Joint Venture; and
with respect to the Valuation, the valuation methodology employed by Maxit Capital required the development of long-range financial projections for GQ California, which reflect numerous assumptions regarding the impact of general economic and industry conditions on GQ California’s future financial results, and which assumptions may prove to be incorrect.

SummaryEY has no control. Going concern business value is inherently and inescapably a matter of implicit or explicit perceptions of the potential future economic performance of the business to be valued and the environment in which that performance will take place. Recognizing that those perceptions are developed under conditions where neither contractual nor other bases exist to ensure that actual operating results will conform to the assumptions employed for valuation purposes, the analysis necessarily works with contingent and uncertain information and there is a corresponding degree of uncertainty in the resultant estimates of value.

EY does not warrant that the projections and estimates employed in developing the Formal Valuation and Fairness Opinion represent commitments as to what the future performance of the businesses will be.

The values are considered to be reasonable estimates on the basis of the information and assumptions upon which they are predicated and as of the time when the estimates were developed. However, should significant deviations from these assumptions emerge in the future, the estimates may well cease to be representative of value.


Valuation Methodologies

This Valuation was prepared in accordance with

Mineral properties can be classified into exploration, development, or producing assets. Depending on the guidelinesavailability of engineering and financial information one or more of the Investment Dealers Associationincome, market and cost approaches may be favoured. Typically, an income approach is most suitable where a well-developed life of Canada (‘‘IDA’’)mine plan and Standard No. 110financial model are available and this would generally be the case with a development or producing asset. While market approaches can be applied to exploration and development assets it is important to recognize that there are no “true” comparables and application of market approaches can be subjective as every mineral property is unique. Application of a market approach to an income producing property would also be impacted as again there are no “true” comparables.

Generally, a business or asset may be valued based on the appropriate application of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators (‘‘CICBV’’), but neitherincome, market, cost approaches and/or adjusted net assets approach. Although all these approaches may be considered in a valuation analysis, the IDA nor the CICBV was involved in the preparation or reviewnature of the Valuation.asset and the availability of data will dictate which approaches are applied. Each approach is discussed below.

The Valuation was prepared based on techniques that Maxit Capital

Selected Approaches

EY considered appropriatean income approach, in the circumstances, after considering all relevant factsparticular a discounted cash flow, and taking into account the assumptions set out in the Valuation, in ordera trading and a transaction multiples (in-situ gold equivalent ounce multiples) approach to arrive at “fairestimate a range of fair market value” of GQ California. In this context and for the purposes of the Valuation, “fair market value” was defined as the price available in an open and unrestricted market between informed, prudent parties, acting at arm’s length and under no compulsion to act, expressed in terms of money or money’s worth.

Values determined in the Valuation and on the foregoing basis represent the “market trading” values of GQ California. Market trading values represent the expected price an acquirer would be required to pay to obtain less than a majority of the voting interests of GQ California. Given the amounts being financed through the Joint Venture relative to the market capitalization of the Company, Maxit Capital felt that it is appropriate to take into consideration typical price discounts required to complete a large equity financing in the public or private markets.

- 17 -


A description of the valuation methodologies used and applied by Maxit Capital follows.

Net Asset Value Analysis

Maxit Capital valued GQ California based on a net asset value (“NAV”) approach. This approach involves attributing values to each of a company’s assets and liabilities, as applicable, using the assumptions and methodologies appropriate in each case and reflects the risks, prospects and profitability of each asset. As a result, NAV analysis is the fundamental method used to value mining assets and their associated liabilities which are, by nature, each subject to a variety of unique factors.

GQ California’s only assets and liabilities are derived from the Soledad Project and therefore, the value of GQ California can be estimated by determining the net present value (“NPV”FMV”) of the Soledad Project’s future cash flows. At the date of the Valuation, there are no corporate general and administrative expenses incurred by GQ California that are not related to the Soledad Project and as such do not need to be calculated separately.

Maxit Capital relied primarily on a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) approach to evaluate the NPV of the SoledadMountain Project. NPV estimates from third-party independent research reports were also reviewed given that the market trading multiple analysis (outlined below) was based on street consensus estimates.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

The DCF approach calculates a value of an asset by taking into account the amount, timing and relative certainty of projected unlevered free cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. The DCF approach requires that certain assumptions be made regarding, among other things, mine operating performance and future commodity prices to estimate the future unlevered free cash flows of the asset. The possibility that some of the assumptions will prove to be inaccurate is one factor involved in the determination of the discount rates used to discount the unlevered free cash flows to present value. The unlevered free cash flows and discount rates were considered on a real, constant dollar basis rather than on a nominal dollar basis.

As a basis for the development of the projected unlevered free cash flows, Maxit Capital reviewed the applicable forecasts in the Company’s technical report titled “Soledad Mountain Project – Technical Report” prepared by Norwest Corporation and AMEC E&C Services Inc. with an effective date of October 17, 2012 (the “Feasibility Study Forecasts”). Maxit Capital reviewed the relevant underlying assumptions including, but not limited to, ore tonnage mined and crushed, ore grades, recovery rates, operating costs, capital expenditures and commodity prices. These assumptions were reviewed in comparison to sources considered relevant, including detailed discussions with the Company’s senior management. From this review, Maxit Capital developed its own base case operating forecasts (the “Maxit Capital Operating Forecasts”), formed independently with the benefit of its understanding of the assumptions behind the Feasibility Study Forecasts. The unlevered free cash flows were then discounted to a present value using an appropriate discount rate. Finally, Maxit Capital ran sensitivity analyses on certain key input assumptions to understand the impact of a change in those assumptions and the corresponding change in value of GQ California.

Market Trading Multiples Analysis

Precious metals mining companies generally trade at a multiple to their NAV (a “P/NAV Multiple”). Once the NAV of a company has been estimated, it isEY qualitatively adjusted to derive market trading value by applying an appropriate P/NAV multiple. In the case of the Joint Venture, selecting a P/NAV Multiple took into careful consideration the financing nature of the Joint Venture, the relative size of the Joint Venture compared to the Company’s market capitalization and the typical discount required to complete an equity financing of this magnitude in the public or private markets.

Comparable public entities were used to assess the appropriate P/NAV Multiple to apply to GQ California’s NAV prior to applying a typical equity financing discount. The companies considered comparable were reviewed in terms of geographic location, operating characteristics, growth prospects, risk profile and size. Maxit Capital identified and reviewed seven publically traded gold companies that are in the construction stage or are near construction as of the date hereof, and assessed the market trading multiples for such companies.

Maxit Capital considered P/NAV to be the primary valuation multiple when applying the market trading multiples methodology. Enterprise Value per resource ounce (“EV/ounce”) was also evaluated but not relied upon given that this is a crude metric which fails to take into account the quality of assets and certain other factors, including regulatory and environmental factors, which may affect the amount of the resource that is ultimately able to be mined.

- 18 -


Comparable Precedent Financings Analysis

Precedent equity financing transactions were also reviewed given that the Joint Venture replicates a traditional equity financing and replaces the need to complete a sizeable placement in the future to fund most of the development of the Soledad Project. Maxit Capital reviewed 26 recent financing transactions, 11 of which were transactions in which the issuer raised gross proceeds in excess of C$50 million and 15 of which were completed by companies in the development stage, whose main commodity is gold and with a market capitalization between $75 million and $500 million at the time of the transaction. For each transaction, Maxit Capital reviewed the gross proceeds raised as a percentage of the company’s market capitalization and the offer price discount to the company’s last share price prior to announcement.

Valuation Conclusion

The valuation methodologies were applied to the Company, and the results are set out under “Application of Valuation Methodologies” in the attached Valuation.

Maxit Capital did not attribute any particular weight to any specific factor but, rather, made qualitative judgments based on its experience in rendering such opinions and on circumstances then prevailing as to the significance and relevance of each factor. Based upon and subject to the factors set out in the Valuation, Maxit Capital is of the opinion that as of close of business on June 6, 2014, the fair market value of GQ California was in the range of $95 millionvalue to $126 million, concludingreflect Golden Queen’s potential lack of access to capital markets (debt and equity) and/or an ability to sell its interest in GQM US to parties other than the Clay Group.

EY used an adjusted net assets approach to calculate the FMV of the Shares.

Formal Valuation

Based on the information reviewed, observations, assumptions, limitations, analyses and other relevant factors, it is EY’s opinion that the fair market value of the interestGolden Queen shares would be in GQ California to be acquired by Gauss was in thea range of $48 millionC$[♦] per share (US$[♦], converted to $63 million.

Note that the amountC$ at[♦]) to C$[♦] per share (US$[♦], converted to C$ at[♦]), before considering any costs of the consideration to be paid by Gauss for the 50% interest in GQ California was determined through negotiations between the parties, and Maxit Capital did not make a recommendation as to the amount of consideration to be paid.proposed Transaction.

The Fairness Opinion

Based uponon the information reviewed, observations, assumptions, limitations, analyses and subject to theother relevant factors, set out in the Fairness Opinion, Maxit Capitalit is of theEY’s opinion that, as of the date of the Fairness Opinion, the consideration to be received by the Company pursuant to the Joint Ventureproposed Transaction is fair, [♦]from a financial point of view to the Company.existing Shareholders, other than the Purchasers.

Tax Consequences of the Joint Venture

The Company’s Canadian and United States tax advisors are of the view that

Golden Queen expects there will be no material adverse tax consequences to the Company resulting fromunder the Joint Venture.

Special Committee Proceedings

On January 11, 2014,Income Tax Act (Canada) or the Board appointed Bernard Guarnera, Guy Le Bel and Bryan CoatesU.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the Special Committee to review, consider and report to the Board on the terms and meritsa result of the Joint Venture and to advise the Board whether or not the Joint Venture is in the best interestsTransaction. The disposition of the Company, is fair and reasonableshares of GQM US will be treated for income tax purposes as a taxable transaction, upon which Golden Queen does not expect to recognize a gain.

Golden Queen also expects there will be no material tax consequences to Shareholders (excluding the Company, and should be pursued byPurchasers), under the Company and recommended toIncome Tax Act (Canada) or the shareholdersU.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as a result of the CompanyTransaction. However, Shareholders should consult their own legal and tax advisors for approval.advice with respect to their particular circumstances.

The Board adopted the mandate of the Special Committee, which included, among other items that:

- 19 -


As part of its mandate, the Special Committee was authorized to engage such professional advisors as the Special Committee considered appropriate, including legal, financial and accounting advisors. In order to undertake deliberate and full consideration of the Joint Venture, the Special Committee engaged Maxit Capital as its financial advisor and to provide (i) an opinion as to the fairness of the Joint Venture from a financial point of view to the Company; and (ii) a valuation of the subject matter of the Joint Venture.Shareholder Approval

Deliberations of the Special Committee

The Special Committee held a totalTransaction constitutes the sale of ten meetings to reviewall or substantially all of the Joint Ventureassets of Golden Queen and discuss alternatives, at whichrequires approval of the financial advisor, counsel, management andShareholders in accordance with the BCBCA. In addition, the Purchasers include Thomas M. Clay, were selectively invited to respond to questions from the Special Committee. The Special Committee members also attended seven Board meetings at which the Joint Venture was discussed,a former director and various strategic meetingsofficer of Golden Queen, and discussions with management of the Company and Thomas M. Clay.

Maxit Capital provided the Special Committee with a presentation dated June 6, 2014, and on June 7, 2014 provided the Special Committee with (i) its oral opinion that the Joint Venture was fair from a financial point of view to the Company; and (ii) an oral opinion as to the valuation of the subject matter of the Joint Venture. Maxit Capital provided the special committee with the Valuation and Fairness Opinion, summarized above.

Members of the Special Committee reviewed and provided input on the Transaction Agreement and Joint Venture Agreement, and discussed and/or reviewed the ancillary agreements presented to the Special Committee. They also reviewed tax advice provided by Mining Tax Plan LLP of Centennial, Colorado and BDO Canada LLP relating to the structure of the Joint Venture. In addition, members of the Special Committee attended two conference calls and one meeting with Leucadia to discuss the terms of the Joint Venture.

In evaluating the Joint Venture, the Special Committee considered the following factors:

- 20 -


Recommendation of the Special Committee

The Special Committee has determined, based upon the considerations noted above, that the terms of the Joint Venture are in the best interests of the Company. The Special Committee evaluated all factors considered relevant in light of its knowledge of the business and operations of the Company. The Special Committee recommended that the Board approve the Joint Venture.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board, with Thomas M. Clay abstaining from voting, resolved, based upon the considerations noted below, that the terms of the Joint Venture are in the best interests of the Company, and recommends that the shareholders of the Company vote in favor of the resolution approving the Joint Venture.

In arriving at its conclusion, the Board considered, among other matters:

(a)the recommendation of the Special Committee;
(b)the factors outlined by the Special Committee that make the Joint Venture advantageous to the Company and the Company’s shareholders;
(c)information with respect to the Company’s financial condition, business and operations, on both an historical and prospective basis, including information in respect of the Company on a pro forma consolidated basis;
(d)the oral valuation and fairness opinion provided by Maxit Capital in connection with the Joint Venture, as documented in the Valuation and Fairness Opinion; and
(e)that the Joint Venture must be approved by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders of Golden Queen voting in person or by proxy at the Meeting, excluding the votes of the Clay Group and associates and affiliates of the Clay Group.

Intentions of Directors and Officers

The directors and officers of the Company intend to vote their Shares in favor of the Joint Venture. The Shares held by such directors and officers represent approximately 1.63% of Golden Queen’s issued and outstanding Shares asShares. As such, the Transaction is considered to be a related party transaction under MI 61-101 and section 501(c) of the date of this Proxy Statement. This excludesTSX Company Manual, and is subject to the Shares of Thomas M. Clay, who, as a memberminority approval requirements in MI 61-101 and the TSX Company Manual.


Golden Queen has determined that the Transaction Resolution must be approved by both (a) ⅔ of the Clay Group, will have his votes excluded from the determination of whether or not the shareholders have approved the Joint Venture.

Certain members of the Clay Group, including Thomas M. Clay, have entered into a voting and support agreement with Leucadia, pursuant to which they have agreed to support the Joint Venture. In particular, they have agreed that for so long as the Transaction Agreement remains in effect, they will vote against: any Takeover Proposal or superior proposal; any action, proposal or transaction which would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of the Transaction Agreement; any amendment of the Company’s organization documents; or any other action, proposal or transaction that could reasonably be expected to have a negative effectcast on the Joint Venture. They have also agreed not to sell, transfer, encumber or otherwise dispose of any of their Shares of the Company, or enter into any other voting arrangements.

Shareholder Approval

The resolution to approve the Joint Venture must be passed by not less thanresolution; and (b) a simple majority of the votes cast on such resolution by the Shareholders, excluding votes cast by Shareholders that are required to be excluded pursuant to applicable securities laws and the policies of the TSX. The votes attached to an aggregate of 177,701,229 Shares (representing approximately 59.2% of the issued and outstanding Shares) owned by the Purchasers will be excluded from voting in determining whether the Transaction has been approved by the minority shareholders present in person or by proxyof Golden Queen.

Shareholders will be asked at the Meeting excluding the votes of the Clay Group and associates and affiliates of the Clay Group. Accordingly, the Company’s shareholders, other than those set out under “Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon” above, will be asked to consider and, if thought advisable, to pass, with or without amendment,approve the following ordinaryspecial resolution:

- 21 -


“BE IT RESOLVED as an ordinary resolution passed by a majority of disinterested shareholders, THAT:

(a)the joint venture to develop and operate the Soledad Mountain Project (the “Joint Venture”), including the investment of the Clay Group, as contemplated in the: (i) transactionshare purchase agreement dated June 8, 2014 between Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (the “Company”), Golden Queen Mining Company, Inc., Gauss Holdings LLC, Auvergne LLC and Gauss LLC; (ii) terms of the amended and restated limited liability company agreement of Golden Queen Mining Company LLC to be entered into by the Company, a newly formed California subsidiary of the Company, Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC and Gauss LLC; and (iii) the related agreements contemplated thereby, all as more particularly describedPurchasers (as defined in the Company’s proxy statement and management information circular dated <>[♦], 2014,2019 (“Proxy Statement”)) dated February 7, 2019 (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) and the sale of all of the shares of Golden Queen Mining Holdings, Inc. in accordance with the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement, be and are hereby authorized, approved, ratified and confirmed, and the Company is hereby authorized and approved;to perform all of its obligations thereunder;

(b)notwithstanding that this resolution has been passed by the Transaction Agreement,shareholders of the actions ofCompany, the directors of the Company in approving the Joint Ventureare hereby authorized and the Transaction Agreement, and the actionsempowered, at their discretion, without any further notice to or approval of the directors or officersshareholders of the Company, in executing and deliveringto amend the TransactionShare Purchase Agreement and causingor any agreement ancillary thereto to the performanceextent permitted by the Companyterms thereof or, subject to the terms of its obligations thereunder bethe Share Purchase Agreement, not to proceed with any or all of the transactions contemplated thereby; and are hereby confirmed, ratified, authorized and approved;

(C)(c)any one director or officer of the Company is hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the Company, to do all acts and things and to execute and deliver all documents required, as in the opinion of such director or officer may be necessary or appropriatedesirable in order to give effect to these resolutionsthis resolution and the Joint Venture; and
(d)notwithstanding that these resolutions have been passedmatters authorized thereby, such determination to be conclusively evidenced by the shareholdersexecution and delivery of such document or the Company, the boarddoing of directors of the Company, at any time in its sole and absolute discretion and without further notice to the shareholders, be and is hereby authorized and empowered to not proceed with the Joint Venturesuch act or otherwise give effect to this resolution at any time prior to the closing of the Joint Venture.thing.

The Board unanimously recommends athat Shareholders vote FOR the resolution to approve the Joint Venture.Transaction Resolution set out above. Unless such authority is withheld, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy intend to vote FOR the approval of the Joint Venture.Transaction Resolution.

OTHER MATTERS

Dissent Rights

Under the BCBCA, Shareholders have dissent rights with respect to the resolution approving the Transaction. Shareholders who wish to dissent should take note that the procedures for dissenting to the Transaction Resolution requires strict compliance with Sections 237 to 247 of the BCBCA.

The following description of the rights of Registered Shareholders to dissent from the Transaction Resolution is not a comprehensive statement of the procedures to be followed by a dissenting Shareholder who seeks payment of the fair value of their Shares. A Registered Shareholder's failure to follow exactly the procedures set forth in Sections 237 to 247 of the BCBCA will result in the loss of such Registered Shareholder's dissent rights. If you are a Registered Shareholder and wish to dissent in respect of the Transaction Resolution, you should obtain your own legal advice and carefully read the provisions of Sections 237 to 247 of the BCBCA (see Schedule B).

Any Registered Shareholder is entitled to be paid the fair value of the Shares held in accordance with Section 245 of the BCBCA if such holder duly dissents in respect of the Transaction Resolution and the Transaction becomes effective (the “Dissent Rights”). A shareholder is not entitled to dissent with respect to such holder’s shares if such holder votes any of those shares in favor of the Transaction Resolution.

Anyone who is a beneficial owner of Shares registered in the name of an intermediary and who wishes to dissent should be aware that only Registered Shareholders are entitled to exercise Dissent Rights. A Registered Shareholder who holds Shares as an intermediary for one or more beneficial owners, one or more of whom wish to exercise Dissent Rights, must exercise such Dissent Rights on behalf of such holder(s). In such case, the notice should specify the number of Shares held by the intermediary for such beneficial owner. A dissenting Shareholder may dissent only with respect to all of the Shares held on behalf of any one beneficial owner and registered in the name of the dissenting Shareholder.


A dissenting Shareholder is required to send a written objection to the Transaction Resolution to Golden Queen, knowsprior to the Meeting, as described below.A vote against the Transaction Resolution or not voting on the Transaction Resolution does not constitute a written objection for purposes of nothe right to dissent under Section 242 of the BCBCA.

Each Shareholder of the Company who intends to exercise Dissent Rights must send a written notice of dissent from the Transaction Resolution pursuant to Section 242 of the BCBCA, to the Company by 4:00 p.m. (Pacific time) on May 9, 2019. The notice of dissent should be delivered by registered mail to the Company at the address for notice described below.

After the Transaction Resolution is approved by Shareholders and within one month after the Company notifies each Shareholder that has validly exercised Dissent Rights (the “Dissenting Shareholder”) of the Company’s intention to act upon the Transaction Resolution, the Dissenting Shareholder must send to the Company a further written notice. Such notice must state that the Dissenting Shareholder requires the purchase of all of the Shares (the “Dissenting Shares”) in respect of which such Dissenting Shareholder has given notice of dissent (the “Dissent Completion Notice”), together with the share certificate or certificates representing the Dissenting Shares (including a written statement prepared in accordance with Section 244(1)(c) of the BCBCA if the dissent is being exercised by the shareholder on behalf of a beneficial holder). Upon receipt of the Dissent Completion Notice, the Dissenting Shares will be repurchased by the Company in accordance with the BCBCA. The Dissenting Shareholder will be entitled to receive the fair value that the Dissenting Shares had immediately before the passing of the Transaction Resolution.

A shareholder who does not strictly comply with the dissent procedures or, for any other matters that are likelyreason, is not entitled to be brought beforepaid fair value for his, her or its Dissenting Shares will participate in the Meeting. Transaction on the same basis as non-dissenting Shareholders.

Address for Notice

All notices of dissent to the Transaction Resolution pursuant to Section 242 of the BCBCA should be sent to the Company at:

Morton Law LLP

1200 – 750 West Pender Street

Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2T8

Attention: Edward L. Mayerhofer

Strict Compliance with Dissent Provisions Required

The foregoing summary does not purport to provide a comprehensive statement of the procedures to be followed by Shareholders who wish to dissent from the Transaction Resolution and be paid the fair value of their Shares and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Sections 237 to 247 of the BCBCA. The dissent procedures must be strictly adhered to and any failure by a Shareholder to do so will result in the loss of that holder’s Dissent Rights. Accordingly, each Shareholder who wishes to exercise Dissent Rights should carefully consider and comply with the Dissent Procedures and consult such holder’s legal advisers.

PROPOSAL 2: SHARE CONSOLIDATION

Following completion of the Transaction, Golden Queen is proposing to consolidate its Shares on the basis of ten existing Shares for each one Post-Consolidation Share. The Board believes it is in the best interest of Golden Queen to reduce the number of outstanding Shares, making Golden Queen more attractive to investors in potential future financings and transactions that may follow the Transaction. Management intends to proceed with the Consolidation on completion of the Transaction, but completion of the Transaction is not contingent on the approval of the Consolidation Resolution.

Notwithstanding approval of the proposed Consolidation by Shareholders, the Board, in its sole discretion, may revoke the Consolidation Resolution and abandon the Consolidation without further approval or action by or prior notice to Shareholders. The Consolidation is also subject to the approval of the TSX.


Effect of the Consolidation

If however,the Transaction is completed and Golden Queen proceeds with the Consolidation, the number of Shares issued and outstanding will be reduced from 122,400,212 Shares, after cancellation of Shares pursuant to the Transaction, to approximately 12,240,021 Post-Consolidation Shares issued and outstanding. In the event the Consolidation would result in a Shareholder holding a fraction of a Post-Consolidation Share, no fractional Post-Consolidation Share shall be issued, and such fraction will be rounded to the nearest whole Post-Consolidation Share in accordance with the requirements of the BCBCA.

Except for any variances attributable to the rounding of fractional Post-Consolidation Shares, the change in the number of issued and outstanding Shares will cause no change in the capital attributable to the Shares and will not materially affect any Shareholder’s percentage ownership in Golden Queen. In addition, the Consolidation will not materially affect any Shareholder’s proportionate voting rights.

See “Risk Factors – Risks Associated with the Consolidation” for a description of risk factors associated with the Consolidation.

Procedure for Consolidation

If the Transaction is completed and Golden Queen proceeds with the Consolidation, Registered Shareholders holding share certificates will be required to exchange their certificates for share certificates representing Post-Consolidation Shares. A letter of transmittal will be sent to such Registered Shareholders. No delivery of a certificate evidencing a Post-Consolidation Share will be made to a Shareholder until the Shareholder has surrendered the issued certificates representing its pre-consolidation Shares. Until surrendered, each certificate formerly representing pre-consolidation Shares shall be deemed for all purposes to represent the number of Post-Consolidation Shares to which the holder is entitled as a result of the Consolidation.

Beneficial Shareholders, holding their Shares through a bank, broker or other matters not presently knownnominee should note that such banks, brokers or determined properly come beforeother nominees may have various procedures for processing the Consolidation. If a Shareholder holds Shares with such a bank, broker or other nominee and has any questions in this regard, the Shareholder is encouraged to contact its nominee.

Shareholder Approval

At the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on the Consolidation Resolution approving the Consolidation. The Consolidation Resolution must be approved by ⅔ of the votes cast on the Consolidation Resolution.

Shareholders will be asked at the Meeting to approve the following special resolution:

“BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

(a)Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) be and is hereby authorized to consolidate all of its issued and outstanding common shares without par value (the “Shares”) on the basis of one (1) post-consolidation Share for every ten (10) pre-consolidation Shares;

(b)in the event that the consolidation would otherwise result in the issuance of a fractional Share, no fractional Share shall be issued, and such fraction will be rounded to the nearest whole number in accordance with the requirements of theBusiness Corporations Act (British Columbia);

(c)any Director or Officer of the Company be and is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Company to prepare, sign and deliver all documents and to do all things necessary and advisable to give effect to these resolutions;

(d)notwithstanding the shareholders’ approval by this resolution of the proposal to consolidate the issued share capital of the Company, the Directors of the Company be and are hereby authorized without further approval of the Shareholders to modify, vary or amend such terms and conditions in respect of the consolidation as may be required by the regulatory authorities having jurisdiction or as the Board may in its sole discretion deem in the best interests of the Company; and

(e)notwithstanding the shareholders’ approval by this resolution of the proposal to consolidate the Shares, the Directors of the Company be and they are hereby authorized without further approval of the shareholders to revoke the resolution consolidating the Shares before it is acted upon.”

The Board unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the Consolidation Resolution set out above. Unless such authority is withheld, the persons named as proxies in the enclosed Proxy or VIF or their substitutes willintend to vote FOR the approval of the Consolidation Resolution.

Dissent Rights

Shareholders do not have dissent rights with respect to the proposed Consolidation.

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and Section 14A of the Exchange Act require that we provide our Shareholders the opportunity to vote on a nonbinding, advisory resolution regarding the compensation of our “named executive officers” (as defined in SEC rules) as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC (commonly referred to as “Say-on-Pay”), including compensation that will or may be paid or become payable to our “named executive officers” under existing employment agreements in connection with the Transaction. This compensation is described in the table in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Interests of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon — Executive Officer Employment Agreements — Golden Parachute Compensation,” including the footnotes to the table and related narrative discussion,above, and “Executive Compensation - Summary Compensation Table,” including the footnotes to the table and related narrative discussion, below.

The Board unanimously recommends that Shareholders approve the following Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution:

“BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Shareholders of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby approve, on an advisory basis (non-binding basis), the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the “Executive Compensation - Summary Compensation Table” and the related tabular and narrative disclosures in this Proxy Statement, including compensation under existing agreements or understandings that may be paid or become payable in connection with the Transaction, in each case as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K in the table in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Interests of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon — Executive Officer Employment Agreements — Golden Parachute Compensation,” including the footnotes to the table and the related narrative discussion.”

The vote on the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution is a vote separate and apart from the vote on the proposal to approve the Transaction. Accordingly, you may vote to approve the Transaction and vote not to approve the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution and vice versa. Because the vote on the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution is advisory only, it will not be binding on the Company. Accordingly, if the Transaction Resolution is approved and the Transaction is completed, the compensation will be payable, subject only to the conditions applicable thereto under the applicable compensation agreements and arrangements, regardless of the outcome of this advisory (non-binding) vote of the Shareholders.

The above resolution approving the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the Shares entitled to vote on the matter and casting votes for or against the proposal.

The Board unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution set out above. Unless such authority is withheld, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy intend to vote FOR the approval of the Advisory Say-on-Pay Resolution.

35 

PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF HOLDING THE SAY ON PAY VOTE

In addition to the Say-on-Pay vote set forth in Proposal 3, the Dodd-Frank Act and Section 14A of the Exchange Act require that Shareholders have the opportunity, at least once every six years, to vote on how often they believe Say-on-Pay votes should be held in the future. Our last vote on Say-on-Pay frequency was held on May 30, 2013.

Shareholders may indicate whether they prefer that a Say-on-Pay vote be held every year, every two years or every three years, or they may abstain from this vote.

After careful consideration of the various arguments supporting each frequency level, the Board has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation every three years is the best approach for the Company. Our executive compensation program is intended to incentivize and reward performance over a multi-year period, and a three-year cycle is consistent with these time horizons. A three-year cycle is an appropriate frequency to provide the Board and the Compensation Committee sufficient time to consider Shareholder input and implement any appropriate changes to our executive compensation strategies. Shareholders who have concerns about executive compensation during the interval between Say-on-Pay votes are welcome to bring their concerns to the attention of the Board.

The vote on this proposal is an advisory vote and is not binding on the Company. The outcome of this vote will not require the Board to take any action regarding the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes. However, the Board will take into consideration the outcome of the vote when considering the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes.

The proxy card provides Shareholders with four choices (every 1 YEAR, 2 YEARS, 3 YEARS, or ABSTAIN).

The Board unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote for the option of “3 YEARS” as the preferred frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes. Unless such authority is withheld, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy intend to vote for the option of “3 YEARS” as the preferred frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes.

PROPOSAL 5: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board proposes to fix the number of directors of the Company at three (3) and that the following three (3) nominees be elected as directors at the Meeting, each of whom will hold office until the expiration of their term or until his successor shall have been duly appointed or elected and qualified: Paul M. Blythe, Bryan A. Coates, and Bernard Guarnera.

Although the Board anticipates that the nominees will be available to serve as directors of Golden Queen, if any of them should be unwilling or unable to serve, it is intended that the proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute nominee or nominees as may be designated by the Board.

The Board unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the election of each nominee. Unless such authority is withheld, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy intend to vote FOR the election of each nominee.

As part of its ongoing review of corporate governance policies, on March 5, 2014, the Board adopted a policy providing that in an uncontested election of directors, any nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” than votes “for” will tender his or her resignation to the Chairman of the Board promptly following the shareholders’ meeting. The Board will consider the offer of resignation and will make a decision whether or not to accept it. In considering whether or not to accept the resignation, the Board will consider all relevant factors. The Board will be expected to accept the resignation except in situations where the considerations would warrant the applicable director continuing to serve on the Board. The Board will make its final decision and announce it in a press release within 90 days following the shareholders’ meeting. A director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this policy will not participate in any meeting of the Board at which the resignation is considered.

The following table sets out the names of the nominees, their positions and offices in the Company, principal occupations, the period of time that they have been directors of the Company, whether or not they are considered independent or non-independent, the number of shares of the Company which each beneficially owns or over which control or direction is exercised, Board/Committee membership and attendance, and other public board of directorships information:


Name, Present Office,
Province/State & Country of
Residence

Present Principal Occupation or Employment(1)Security Holdings(2)

PAUL M. BLYTHE

 

Director

Collingwood, ON, Canada

Mr. Blythehas over 40 years experience in the mining industry including significant international experience in corporate management, project development, open pit and underground operations, mergers and acquisitions, and debt and equity financing. He was the founder and President of Quadra FNX Mining and previously worked for Westmin Resources Limited, Placer Dome Canada Limited, Lac Minerals Limited and BHP Billiton. It is the determination of the Board that Mr. Blythe’s technical expertise as well as his corporate development activities are an asset to the Company.

Date first appointed as a Director:March 30, 2017

Common Shares: 1,580,000

Stock Options: 150,000

IndependentBoard/Committee
Memberships
Attendance at Meetings
During 2018
Other Public Board
Directorships
YesBoard of Directors4nil
Audit Committee4
Compensation Committeenil
Nominating Committeenil

BRYAN A. COATES

 

Director

Saint-Lambert, Quebec, Canada

Mr. Coates currently serves as President of Osisko Gold Royalties since June 2014. Prior to that, he was the Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Osisko Mining. He was responsible for all activities related to financing, financial reporting, marketing related to the gold industry, risk management and government relations. Mr. Coates has more than 30 years of progressive experience within the international and Canadian mining industry. Before joining Osisko, he was Chief Financial Officer of Iamgold (2006-2007), Cambior Inc. (2001-2006), and Cia Minera Antamina (1998-2001). He also acts as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Fédération des Chambres de Commerce du Quebec’s, as well as the chair of the Chamber's Mining Industry Committee. He is a member of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario. It is the determination of the Board that Mr. Coates’ financial acumen in conjunction with his public company expertise is an asset to the Company.

Date first appointed as a Director:January 28, 2013

Common Shares: 17,000

Stock Options: 382,500

Warrants: 8,500

IndependentBoard/Committee Memberships

Attendance at Meetings

During 2018

Other Public Board Directorships
YesBoard of Directors4Alio Gold Inc.
Audit Committee4Falco Resources
Compensation CommitteenilTechnosub
Nominating Committeenil


BERNARD GUARNERA

 

Director

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Mr. Guarnera has over 40 years of experience in the global mining industry and is President of Broadlands Mineral Advisory Services Ltd.. Mr. Guarnera was the former Chairman of the Board of Behre Dolbear Group Inc., a mining consulting firm founded in 1991. Mr. Guarnera is a registered professional engineer and a registered professional geologist. He serves as a director of the Colorado Mining Association and Northern Zinc, and is the president of Mining and Metallurgical Society of America. The Board believes that Mr. Guarnera’s technical expertise and his capital market experience make him a valuable member of the Board.

Date first appointed as a Director:May 30, 2013

Common Shares: 25,000

Stock Options: 382,500

IndependentBoard/Committee MembershipsAttendance at Meetings
During 2018
Other Public Board Directorships
YesBoard of Directors4
Audit Committee4
Compensation Committeenil
Nominating Committeenil

(1)The information as to principal occupation and business or employment has been furnished by the respective nominees.
(2)Based upon information furnished to Golden Queen either by the directors and executive officers or from the insider reports and beneficial ownership reports filed with the SEC or available atwww.sedi.ca. These amounts include beneficial ownership of securities not currently outstanding but which are reserved for immediate issuance on exercise of options.

The Board seeks to ensure that it is composed of members whose particular experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, when taken together, will allow the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively. The Board as a whole is responsible for identifying, screening and/or appointing persons to serve on the Board. In identifying Board candidates, it is the Board’s goals to identify persons whom it believes have appropriate expertise and experience to contribute to the oversight of a company of the Company’s nature while also allowing for other appropriate factors. The Board believes that the process in place to identify candidates and elect directors allows the most qualified candidates to be appointed independently.

The Company believes that each of the persons standing for election to the Board at the Meeting has the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that, when taken as a whole, will enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively.

The Board is responsible for overseeing management of the Company and determining the Company’s strategy and for determining whether or not a director is independent. In making this determination, the Board has adopted the definition of “independence” as set forth in National Instrument 58-101Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (“NI 58-101”) and National Policy 58-201Corporate Governance Guidelines(“NP 58-201”) with the recommendation that a majority of the Board be considered “independent”. In applying this definition, the Board considers all relationships of the directors of the Company, including business, family and other relationships.

As at the date of this Proxy Statement, there are three (3) directors on the Board, Paul M. Blythe, Bryan A. Coates, and Bernard Guarnera. All of the three (3) directors, Paul M. Blythe, Bryan A. Coates, and Bernard Guarnera are considered independent. Following the Meeting, the Board, as proposed by management in this Proxy Statement, will consist of Paul M. Blythe, Bryan A. Coates, and Bernard Guarnera.

The Board does not have a policy regarding a Board members’ attendance at annual meetings of shareholders. One director attended the Company’s 2018 annual meeting of shareholders.

38 

Biographical Information Regarding Executive Officers

Robert C. Walish, Jr. – Chief Operating Officer.Mr. Walish is the President & Chief Executive Officer of Golden Queen Mining LLC and was most recently the General Manager of the SCM Franke Operation of KGHM International, formerly QuadraFNX, located in northern Chile, where he was responsible for mining, processing and administration of a four million pound per month open-pit copper mining, heap-leach and SX-EW operation. Prior to that and over the course of more than 30 years, Mr. Walish worked at mines in Guyana, Arizona, Alaska, South Carolina, Montana and Nevada. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Colorado and his Master of Science degree from the University of Wisconsin.

Guy Le Bel - Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Le Belhas more than 30 years of international mining experience in strategic and financial planning. Until recently, he served as Vice President Evaluations for Capstone Mining Corp. and is a Director of Pembridge Resources, PLC and Westbourne Resources Limited. Previously, Mr. Le Bel was VP, Business Development at Quadra Mining Ltd., and prior to that held business advisory, strategy and planning, business valuation, and financial planning management roles at BHP Billiton Base Metals Ltd., Rio Algom Ltd. and Cambior Inc.

Brenda Dayton – Corporate Secretary. Ms. Dayton has served as Corporate Secretary for several mining companies on the NYSE, TSX and TSX Venture and her expertise includes governance, communications and investor relations. Prior to working with public companies, she worked in the financial industry in banking and insurance. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Calgary.

PROPOSAL 6: APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

On March 31, 2016, Golden Queen appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PWC”) as its independent registered public accountant, subject to completion of its standard client acceptance procedures. The appointment of PWC was recommended by Golden Queen’s audit committee after considering proposals from several international public accounting firms, including BDO. As a result of PWC’s appointment, Golden Queen’s engagement of BDO Canada LLP, as its independent registered public accounting firm, was terminated.

Although the appointment of PWC is not required to be submitted to a vote of Shareholders, the Board believes it is appropriate as a matter of policy to request that Shareholders approve the appointment of the independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, and the authorization of the directors to fix the auditors’ remuneration. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting and entitled to vote is required. In the event a majority of the votes cast at the meeting are not voted in favor of appointment, the adverse vote will be considered as a direction to the Board to select other independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.

Section 10(A)(i) of the Exchange Act prohibits the Company’s independent auditors from performing audit services for the Company as well as any services not considered to be “audit services” unless such services are pre-approved by the Audit Committee of the Board, or unless the services meet certainde minimis standards.

Under the Company’s Audit Committee Charter, all non-audit services to be performed by the Company’s independent auditors must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. All of the 2018 audit related fees, and tax fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

See “External Auditor Service Fees” in this Proxy Statement for more information.

Representatives of PWC are expected to be present at the Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and are expected to be available to respond to questions from Shareholders.

The Board unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the appointment of PWC as Golden Queen’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, and the authorization of the directors to fix their remuneration. Unless such authority is withheld, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy intend to vote FOR the approval of the such appointment and authority.

PROPOSAL 7: APPROVAL OF STOCK OPTION PLAN

At the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to approve the adoption of a 2019 stock option plan (the “Plan”). The Plan will come into effect upon the listing of the Shares on the NEX Board of the TSX Venture Exchange. The Company is seeking the approval of the Shareholders in order to comply with the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting and entitled to vote is required.


The purpose of the Plan is to provide an incentive to directors, employees and consultants to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company, to continue their participation in the affairs of the Company and to increase their efforts on behalf of the Company.

The following summary of the Plan does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Plan. A full copy of the Plan will be available at the Meeting for review by Shareholders. Shareholders may also obtain copies of the Plan from the Company prior to the Meeting on written request.

Eligible Participants. Options may be granted under the Plan to directors and senior officers of the Company or its subsidiaries, management company employees (collectively, the “Directors”), employees of the Company or its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Employees”) or consultants of the Company or its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Consultants”). The Board, in its discretion, determines which of the Directors, Employees or Consultants will be awarded options under the Plan.

Number of Shares Reserved. The number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to options granted under the Plan may not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares at the date of granting of options. Options that are exercised, cancelled or expire prior to exercise continue to be issuable under the Plan.

Limitations. Under the Plan, the aggregate number of options granted to any one individual in a 12-month period must not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding Shares of the Company, calculated on the date the option is granted. The aggregate number of options granted to any one Consultant in a 12-month period must not exceed 2% of the issued and outstanding Shares of the Company, calculated at the date the option is granted. The aggregate number of options granted to all persons retained to provide investor relations services to the Company (including Consultants and Employees or Directors whose role and duties primarily consist of providing investor relations services) must not exceed 2% of the issued and outstanding Shares of the Company in any 12-month period, calculated at the date an option is granted to any such person.

Term of Options. Subject to the termination and change of control provisions noted below, the term of any options granted under the Plan is determined by the Board and may not exceed ten years from the date of grant.

Exercise Price. The exercise price of options granted under the Plan is determined by the Board, provided that it is not less than the discounted market price, as that term is defined in the TSX Venture Exchange policy manual or such other minimum price as is permitted by the TSX Venture Exchange in accordance with respectthe policies in effect at the time of the grant, or, if the Shares are no longer listed on the TSX Venture Exchange, then such other exchange or quotation system on which the Shares are listed or quoted for trading. The exercise price of stock options granted to insiders may not be decreased without disinterested Shareholder approval at the time of the proposed amendment.

Vesting. All options granted pursuant to the Plan will be subject to such matters.vesting requirements as may be prescribed by the Exchange, if applicable, or as may be imposed by the Board.

Termination. Any options granted pursuant to the Plan will terminate upon the earliest of:

(a)the end of the term of the option;

(b)on the date the holder ceases to be eligible to hold the option (the “Cessation Date”), if the Cessation Date is as a result of dismissal for cause or regulatory sanction;

(c)one year from the date of death or disability, if the Cessation Date is as a result of death or disability;

(d)on such other date as fixed by the Board, provided that the date is no more than one year from the Cessation Date, if the Cessation Date is as a result of a reason other than death, disability or cause; or

(e)if no date is set by the Board under (d), 90 days from the Cessation Date, if the Cessation Date is as a result of a reason other than death, disability or cause.

Shareholders will be asked at the Meeting to approve the following ordinary resolution:

“BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

(a)The 2019 Stock Option Plan of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) be approved, and that in connection therewith, a maximum of 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company at the time of each grant be approved for granting as options; and

(b)any director or officer of the Company be authorized and directed to do all acts and things and to execute and deliver all documents required, as in the opinion of such director or officer may be necessary or appropriate in order to give effect to this resolution.”

The Board unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the resolution approving the Plan set out above. Unless such authority is withheld, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy intend to vote FOR the approval of the resolution approving the Plan.

A copy of the Plan is available at the records office of the Company at Suite 1200 – 750 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada until the business day immediately preceding the date of the Meeting, and a copy will also be made available at the Meeting.

RISK FACTORS

Shareholders should carefully consider all of the information disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including the risks and uncertainties described below, prior to voting on the matters being put before them at the Meeting. While the risks and uncertainties described below are those that management of the Company believes to be material to the Company with respect to the Joint Venture,Transaction and Consolidation, it is possible that other risks and uncertainties affecting the Company’s business will arise or become material in the future. In addition, shareholdersShareholders should review the risk factors disclosed in Golden Queen’s latest Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2014,[♦], 2019, which are incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

Risks Related to the Joint VentureTransaction

There canThe announcement and pending status of the Transaction, whether or not consummated, may adversely affect our operations.

The announcement and pending status of the Transaction, whether or not consummated, may adversely affect the trading price of our Shares, our current and future operations or our relationships with customers, suppliers and employees. In addition, pending the completion of the Transaction, we may be no certainty that all conditions precedentunable to attract and retain key personnel and the dedication of substantial resources of Golden Queen to the Joint Venturecompletion of the Transaction could have a negative impact on our current operations and could have a material adverse effect on the current and future operations, financial condition and prospects of Golden Queen.

Completion of the Transaction is subject to several conditions that must be satisfied or waived, and we cannot be sure if or when the Transaction will be satisfied.completed.

Our ability to consummate

The completion of the Joint VentureTransaction is subject to a number of conditions precedent, certainsome of which are outside of the control of Golden Queen, including approvals of the Company, includingShareholders and the TSX, and the receipt of regulatory approval. The Company has madethe Withholding Certificate. There can be no certainty, nor can Golden Queen provide any assurance, that these conditions will be satisfied or, if satisfied, when they will be satisfied. Moreover, a submission tosubstantial delay in obtaining satisfactory approvals could result in the TSX regardingTransaction not being completed. If the Joint Venture, andTransaction is not completed for any reason, there are risks that the provisionsannouncement of the Proxy Statementtermination of the Transaction may adversely affect the trading price of our Shares, our current and future operations or our relationships with customers, suppliers and employees. Certain costs relating to the resolution sought were reviewedTransaction, such as legal, accounting, financial advisory and acceptedmeeting related fees and expenses, must be paid by Golden Queen even if the TSX.Transaction is not completed.


In addition, if the Transaction is not completed, all amounts owing under the GQM Loan will become immediately due and payable, and the lenders may choose to pursue any rights and remedies available to them. Our Board, in discharging its fiduciary obligations, may evaluate other strategic alternatives that may not be as favorable to Golden Queen as the Transaction. There is no guarantee that a transaction of equivalent or greater value will be available from an alternative party.

The Share Purchase Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the Transaction.

Pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, Golden Queen was required to pay a termination fee of US$1 million in the event that the Share Purchase Agreement was terminated in certain circumstances prior to April 1, 2019. The termination fee may have discouraged other parties from attempting to propose an alternative transaction, even if such a transaction could have provided better value to Shareholders than the Transaction. However, the Special Committee believed that the termination fee was customary and reasonable and would not unduly preclude a third party from making a superior proposal in accordance with the Share Purchase Agreement.

Subsequent to April 1, 2019, the Share Purchase Agreement prohibits Golden Queen from entertaining competing proposals to the Transaction.

Risks Related to Future Operations

Shareholders will no longer have the opportunity to participate in the prospects of the Soledad Mountain Project.

If the Transaction is completed, we will no longer participate in the future development or benefit from the Soledad Mountain Project. As a result, the Transaction will eliminate the opportunity for Shareholders to participate in the long term potential benefits of the Soledad Mountain Project, to the extent those benefits exceed the potential benefits reflected in the Consideration.

We will no longer have a mineral property and there is no guarantee thatwe will be successful in finding new opportunities.

The Soledad Mountain Project is our only mineral property and there is no guarantee we will be successful in finding new opportunities of equal or greater value to Golden Queen and the Joint VentureShareholders. Our Board will receive final approvalevaluate different alternatives for the use of the cash proceeds from the TSX.

- 22 -


Transaction. Although we expect to restructure our affairs and pursue new opportunities, including a strategic acquisition, there is no guarantee we will be successful, or the Board may decide to utilize all of the proceeds for other purposes. In addition, completion of the Joint Venturefuture opportunities may require obtaining additional financing, and there is contingent on our shareholders approving the Joint Venture. There can be no assurance or guarantee that our shareholders will approve the Joint Venture.

If for any reason the Joint Venture is not completed, the market price of the Shares may be adversely affected. If the Joint Venture is not completed and the Company cannot obtainsuch financing for working capital requirements, the financial condition of the Company will be materially adversely affected.available.

The Transaction Agreementuncertainty regarding our future operations and change in our stock exchange listing may be terminated in certain circumstances.negatively impact the value of our Shares.

The parties

Although our Board will evaluate various alternatives regarding the use of the proceeds from the Transaction, it has made no decision with respect to the Transaction Agreement haveuse of proceeds and has not committed to making any such decision by a particular date. This uncertainty may negatively impact the right to terminatevalue and liquidity of our Shares.

In addition, following the Transaction, Agreement and the Joint Venture in certain circumstances. Accordingly, there is no certainty, nor can the Company provide any assurance, that the Transaction Agreement will not be terminated, with the result that the Joint Venture will not proceed. In addition, in certain circumstances, the Company will be required to pay the Expenses Fee and/or the Termination Fee.

Completion of the Joint Venture will mean that the Company only has a 50% interest in the Soledad Project.

The Soledad Project is the Company’s only mineral property. If the Company were unable to fund the Joint Venture such that its interest in the Soledad Project was diluted further, the market price of the Shares may be adversely affected. In addition, the Company could fail tono longer meet the listing requirements of the TSX, and would runTSX. The Shares are expected to be listed on the risk of being delisted from the TSX. While the majorityNEX Board of the Company’s trading volume occurs onTSX Venture Exchange and a lower tier exchange of the OTCQX International Exchange, ifOTC Markets Group Inc. However, there can be no assurance such listings will be obtained or maintained, or that an active liquid market for the TSX delists our Shares investorswill develop or be sustained. Investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of a trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity and decreased analyst coverage of our securities, and an inability for ussecurities.

We will continue to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.

In addition, there is no assurance thatincur the developmentexpense of complying with public company reporting requirements following the closing of the Soledad ProjectTransaction.

After the Transaction, even though we will not have an active business, we will continue to be required to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and Quebec, as well as the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Compliance with such reporting requirements is economically burdensome.


We may become a ‘‘passive foreign investment company’’ in future tax years, which may have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. Shareholders.

U.S. shareholders should be aware that we may become a “passive foreign investment company” (as defined under Section 1297 of the Code) or “PFIC” in future tax years. We believe we were not classified as a PFIC for the tax year ended December 31, 2018, and based on current business plans and financial expectations, we expect that we should not be a PFIC for the current tax year ending December 31, 2019. If we are a PFIC for any year during a U.S. Shareholder’s holding period of Shares, then such U.S. Shareholder generally will be successful even ifrequired to treat any gain realized upon a disposition of the Joint Venture closes,Shares or that the Joint Venture will have a positive impactany so-called ‘‘excess distribution’’ received on the shareholders.Shares, as ordinary income, and to pay an interest charge on a portion of such gain or distribution. In certain circumstances, the sum of the tax and the interest charge may exceed the total amount of proceeds realized on the disposition, or the amount of excess distribution received, by the U.S. Shareholder. Subject to certain limitations, these tax consequences may be mitigated if a U.S. Shareholder makes a timely and effective “qualified electing fund” election under Section 1295 of the Code (“QEF Election”) or a “mark-to-market” election under Section 1296 of the Code (“Mark-to-Market Election”). Subject to certain limitations, such elections may be made with respect to the Shares. A U.S. Shareholder who makes a timely and effective QEF Election generally must report on a current basis its share of our net capital gain and ordinary earnings for any year in which we are a PFIC, whether or not we distribute any amounts to our Shareholders. For each tax year in which we determine we are a PFIC, upon the written request of a U.S Shareholder, we intend to provide such U.S. Shareholder with a PFIC Annual Information Statement for such tax year. A U.S. Shareholder who makes the Mark-to-Market Election generally must include as ordinary income each year the excess of the fair market value of the Shares over the Shareholder’s basis therein. Each U.S. Shareholder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the PFIC rules and the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Shares.

Risks Related to the Consolidation

Golden Queen’s total market capitalization immediately after the proposed Consolidation may be lower than immediately before the proposed Consolidation

There can be no assurance that the Companytotal market capitalization of Golden Queen (the aggregate value of all Shares at the market price then in effect) immediately after the Consolidation will be capable of raising additional funding requiredequal to continue developmentor greater than the total market capitalization immediately before the Consolidation. In addition, there can be no assurance that the per-share market price of the Soledad ProjectPost-Consolidation Shares will equal or exceed the direct arithmetical result of the Consolidation.

The Consolidation may result in some Shareholders owning “odd lots” of Post-Consolidation Shares.

The Consolidation may result in some Shareholders owning “odd lots” of Post-Consolidation Shares, which may be more difficult to sell, or require greater transaction costs per share to sell, that those held in “board lots”.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table contains information regarding the members and meetnominees of the Board and the Executives of Golden Queen as of the Record Date:

NameAgePositionPosition Held Since
Bryan A. Coates60DirectorJanuary 28, 2013
Bernard Guarnera75DirectorMay 30, 2013
Paul Blythe65DirectorMarch 30, 2017
Robert C. Walish, Jr.65COOAugust 10, 2015
Guy Le Bel60CFOMarch 16, 2017
Brenda Dayton51Corporate SecretaryOctober 1, 2015

All of the officers identified above serve at the discretion of the Board and have consented to act as directors or officers of the Company.


RELATIONSHIPS AMONG DIRECTORS OR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

There are no family relationships among any of the existing directors or executive officers of Golden Queen.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires Golden Queen’s directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of Golden Queen’s securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Shares and other equity securities of Golden Queen. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% Shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish Golden Queen with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of Forms 3 and 4, as amended, furnished to it during its funding obligationsmost recent fiscal year, and Form 5, as amended, furnished to it with respect to such year, the Company believes that during the year ended December 31, 2018, its directors, executive officers and greater than 10% Shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

DIRECTORS COMPENSATION

The following table sets out the compensation provided to the members of the Board during the Company’s year ended December 31, 2018:

Name Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
(US$)
  Stock
Awards
(US$)
 Option
Awards
(US$)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(US$)
 Change in
Pension Value
and Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
 All Other
Compensation
(US$)
 Total
(US$)
 
Bryan A. Coates  35,000  Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil  35,000 
Bernard Guarnera(1)  35,000  Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil  35,000 
Paul M. Blythe  35,000  Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil  35,000 
Thomas Clay(2)  Nil  Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil  Nil 

(1)Director fees earned by Bernard Guarnera were paid to Broadlands Mineral Advisory Services Ltd., a company which he controls.
(2)Thomas M. Clay resigned as the Chairman, the CEO and director on February 7, 2019. Mr. Clay does not receive compensation in his role as a director, but was compensated in his role as CEO. See “Executive Compensation”.

It is currently the policy of the Company to grant options to purchase Shares to its directors under the Joint Venture.Company’s 2013 Stock Option Plan.

Other than as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, there are no other arrangements under which directors of the Company were compensated by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2018 for their services in their capacity as directors and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no additional amounts are payable under any standard arrangements for committee participation or special assignments, except that the Articles of the Company provide that the directors are entitled to be paid reasonable traveling, hotel and other expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties as directors. The Company’s Articles also provide that if a director is called upon to perform any professional or other services for the Company that, in the opinion of the directors, is outside of the ordinary duties of a director, such director may be paid a remuneration to be fixed by the directors and such remuneration may be either in addition to or in substitution for any other remuneration that such director may be entitled to receive.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

For the purposes set out below a “Named Executive Officer” or “NEO” means:

(a)the Company’s chief executive officer (“CEO”);
(b)the Company’s chief financial officer (“CFO”);

(c)each of the three most highly compensated executive officers of the company, including any of its subsidiaries, or the three most highly compensated individuals acting in a similar capacity, other than the CEO and CFO, at the end of the most recently completed financial year whose total compensation was, individually, more than $150,000; and
(d)each individual who would be a named executive officer under subsection (c) above but for the fact that the individual was not an executive officer of the Company or its subsidiaries, nor acting in a similar capacity, at the end of that financial year.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation of Golden Queen’s NEOs during the last three completed fiscal years for services rendered to Golden Queen in all capacities.

             Non-equity incentive      
             plan compensation      
             (US$)      
        Share-  Option-   Long-          
Name and       Based  Based  Annual term  Pension  All other  Total 
Principal    Salary  Awards  Awards  incentive incentive  Value  Compensation  Compensation 
position Year  (US$)  (US$)   (US$)(1)  Plans plans  (US$)  (US$)  (US$) 

Robert C. Walish, Jr.

  2018   184,172   Nil   Nil  NilNil   100,000   284,172 
COO  2017   175,000   Nil   Nil  NilNil   87,500   262,500 
  2016   115,984   Nil   Nil  NilNil   75,000   226,065 
                               
                                

Guy Le Bel(2)

  2018   154,357   Nil   Nil  NilNil   67,531   221,888 
CFO  2017   126,058   Nil   Nil  NilNil   Nil   126,058 
                               
                                
Thomas M. Clay(3)  2018   100,000   Nil   Nil  NilNil   Nil   100,000 
Former Chairman and former CEO  2017   100,000   Nil   38,250  NilNil   Nil   138,250 
  2016   33,333   Nil   Nil  NilNil   Nil   33,333 
                                  

(1)The determination of the value of option awards is based upon the Black-Scholes Option pricing model, details and assumptions of which are set out in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018.
(2)Guy Le Bel assumed the role of CFO on March 16, 2017, and resigned as director on March 30, 2017.
(3)Thomas M. Clay resigned as the Chairman, the CEO and director on February 7, 2019.

Option Grants During the Most Recently Completed Fiscal Year

The Board approves the issuance of stock options to our directors, officers, employees and consultants. Unless otherwise provided by the Board, all vested options are exercisable for a term of five (5) years from the date of grant. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, there were no options granted to the Company’s directors, officers and employees.

Outstanding Equity Awards at the Most Recently Completed Fiscal Year

The following table sets forth the information concerning all option-based awards outstanding for each of Golden Queen’s NEOs as of December 31, 2018:


Name and
Principal Position
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
(US$)
  

Option Expiration

Date

Guy Le Bel  50,000   50,000   Nil   1.67  September 4, 2018
CFO(1)  107,500   107,500   Nil   0.58  September 8,2020
   75,000   75,000   Nil   0.66  November 30, 2021
   400,002   133,334   266,668   0.65  March 20, 2022
   249,999   Nil   249,999   0.29  October 20, 2022
                   
Thomas M. Clay  107,500   107,500   Nil   0.58  September 8, 2020
Former Chairman and former CEO(2)  100,000   100,000   Nil   0.66  November 30, 2021
   250,000   Nil   250,000   0.29  October 20, 2022

(1)Guy Le Bel assumed the role of CFO on March 16, 2017 and resigned as director on March 30, 2017.
(2)Thomas Clay resigned as the Chairman, the CEO and director on February 7, 2019.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets out information as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance:

  Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
 
Plan Category (a)  (b)  (c) 
   50,000  US$1.16    
   150,000  US$1.59     
Equity compensation plans  430,000  US$0.58   4,599,999 
approved by securityholders  365,000  US$0.66     
   400,002  US$0.65     
   1,204,999  US$0.29     
            
Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders
  Nil  Nil   Nil 
            
Total  2,600,001  US$0.54   4,599,999 

Aggregated Stock Option Exercises During the Most Recently Completed Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values

There were no stock options exercised by the Named Executive Officers during the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

The Company has limited financial resources. Assumingentered into consulting or employment contracts with each of the Joint Venture closes,NEOs as follows:


The Company entered into an amended and restated employment contract on October 1, 2017 with Brenda Dayton who is employed as Corporate Secretary of the Company effective October 1, 2015. Her employment with the Company will receive a portion of the funds required to continue its operations. However, the abilitywithout fixed term. Her position as officer of the Company will be renewed annually subject to arrange additional financingthe approval of the Board. Ms. Dayton is entitled to an annual salary of C$110,000, subject to periodic review in accordance with Company practice. Pursuant to the contract, if Ms. Dayton is terminated by the Company without cause or terminated by Ms. Dayton for good reason, within 12 months following a change of control, she will be entitled to receive a lump-sum severance payment equal to her gross annual salary and two times her annual bonus. Ms. Dayton is also entitled to participate in the future will depend, in part,Company’s stock option plan.

The Company entered into an employment contract on March 16, 2017 with Guy Le Bel pursuant to which Mr. Le Bel assumed the prevailing capital market conditions, business performancerole of Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Le Bel is entitled to an annual salary of C$175,000 and a one-time signing bonus of C$25,000. Thereafter, Mr. Le Bel may be paid bonuses at the sole discretion of the Board. Mr. Le Bel also received an initial grant of 400,002 stock options to purchase common shares of the Company for a period of 5 years. The stock options will vest as wellfollows: 133,334 options at 12 months, 133,334 options at 24 months, and 133,334 options at 36 months. Mr. Le Bel is also entitled to participate in the Company’s stock option plan. If Mr. Le Bel is terminated by the Company without cause after the first six months of his employment, he will be entitled to 12 months base salary being C$175,000 and 100% of the last annual bonus granted. In the event that the employment of Mr. Le Bel is terminated by the Company or its successor without cause, or is terminated by Mr. Le Bel for good reason, in either case within 12 months following a change of control, he will be entitled to receive a lump-sum severance payment equal to 24 months base salary, being C$350,000, and two times his annual bonus.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the compensation of Golden Queen’s senior management and officers, reviews and administers Golden Queen’s stock option plan and makes recommendations to the Board regarding such matters. The members of the Compensation Committee are Bernard Guarnera, Bryan A. Coates and Paul M. Blythe, composed entirely of independent directors. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.goldenqueen.com. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee did not hold a meeting.

Composition of the Compensation Committee

The members of the Compensation Committee during the year ended December 31, 2018 were Bernard Guarnera who serves as the market priceCommittee’s Chairman, Bryan A. Coates, and Paul M. Blythe.

Report on Executive Compensation and Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Committee of metals. the Board is responsible for reviewing and approving the remuneration of the senior management of the Company, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.

The recent volatilityguiding philosophy of the Compensation Committee in global equities, commodities, foreign exchange,the determination of executive compensation is ensuring that the Company is able to attract the best possible candidates for management positions, given the high level of competition for competent management in the mining industry, and to align the interests of management with those of the Company’s shareholders.

The Company’s executive compensation policies are designed to recognize and reward individual contribution, performance and level of responsibility and ensure that the compensation levels remain competitive with other precious metals development and mining companies. The key components of total compensation are base metalssalary and incentives.

The Compensation Committee has no formal process for determining appropriate base salary ranges. Currently the Company pays compensation in the form of a lackbase salary to its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer. The base salary to the Chief Executive Officer was based on a proposal from the Chief Financial Officer, which was accepted by the Company after considering his experience and expected responsibility and contribution to the Company. The base salary of market liquidity, may adversely affect the developmentChief Financial Officer was negotiated based on industry comparatives and the Chief Financial Officer’s experience.

Stock options are granted to senior management to align the financial interests of management with the interests of shareholders of the Company and its ability to obtain financing. There is no assuranceencourage senior management to focus on strategies and results that sourcesenhance shareholder value in the longer term. The number of financingoptions to purchase Shares granted to each individual will be availabledepend largely on his level of responsibility and contribution to the Company on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure to obtain additional financing on a timely basis will causeCompany’s performance.


The Compensation Committee is responsible for considering the Company’s interest in the Joint Venture to be diluted.

Further financing by the Company may include issuances of equity, instruments convertible into equity (such as the issuance of rights pursuant to a rights offering) or various forms of debt. The Company has issued Shares or other instruments convertible into equity in the pastappropriateness and cannot predict the size or price of any future issuances of Shares or other instruments convertible into equity, and the effect, if any, that such future issuances and sales will have on the market priceeffectiveness of the Company’s securities. Any additional issuancesexecutive compensation policies, given prevailing circumstances. Although the Shareholder vote on executive compensation, which is submitted every three (3) years, is non-binding, the Compensation Committee will review the voting results in connection with the on-going evaluation of Sharesthe Company’s compensation program.

The Compensation Committee may not delegate any of its authority to other persons.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee served as an officer or securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, Shares may ultimately result in dilution toemployee of the holdersCompany during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (or subsequently). No current member of Shares, dilution in any future earnings per sharethe Compensation Committee formerly served as an officer of the Company, and may have a material adverse effect upon the market pricenone of the Shares.

The board of managerscurrent members of the Joint Venture willCompensation Committee have discretion regardingentered into a transaction with the use and allocationCompany in which they had a direct or indirect interest that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of funds to the development of the Soledad Project.Regulation S-K.

Performance Graph

The boardperformance graph depicts the Company’s cumulative total Shareholder returns over the five (5) most recently completed financial years based on an initial investment of managers and officers of$100 in the Joint Venture will have discretion concerningCompany’s Shares, compared to an equal investment in the use of the proceeds of the Joint Venture, as well as the timing of the application of the proceeds. As a result, shareholders will be relying on the judgment of the managers and officers of the Joint Venture for the application of the proceeds. Golden Queen understands that the intention of the board of managers and officers of the Joint Venture is to spend available funds on the work program described under “About the Soledad Mountain Project.” However, due to the nature of the mining industry and operations, budgets are regularly reviewed in light of the success of the expenditures, and the work program on the Soledad Project mayS&P/TSX Global Gold Index. The Company does not develop exactlycurrently issue dividends. The Share performance as set out in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the abilitygraph does not necessarily indicate future Share price performance.

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2018
 
Company $100  $68  $79  $20  $10 
S&P/TSX Global Gold Index (TITTGD) $100  $89  $133  $134  $128 

Source: TSX InfoSuite

REPORT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Canadian Securities Administrators have adopted NI 58-101 and NP 58-201 (the “Guidelines”), both of which came into force as of June 30, 2005 and effectively replaced the corporate governance guidelines and disclosure policies of the TSX. NI 58-101 requires issuers such as the Company to carry out operations will dependdisclose the corporate governance practices that they have adopted, while NP 58-201 provides guidance on the other Joint Venture participants. There may be circumstances where, for sound business reasons,corporate governance practices. In this regard, a reallocation of funds or change in work program may be necessary.

- 23 -


The Valuation and Fairness Opinion prepared by Maxit Capital is subject to certain assumptions, limitations and qualifications.

The Valuation and Fairness Opinion prepared by Maxit Capital, which support the consideration to be paid by Gauss for the interest in GQ California and concludes that the Joint Venture is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Company, was based on information provided to Maxit Capital by the Company, as well as certain other publicly available information. The Valuation and Fairness Opinion are subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications described in the summary of the Valuation and Fairness Opinion included in this Proxy Statement, and as a result, may not be a completely accurate analysis of the value of the interest in GQ Califorina to be acquired by Gauss.

The Clay Group owns a substantial interest in the Company and is represented on our board of directors and its committees, and thus may exert significant influence on our corporate affairs and actions, including those submitted to a shareholder vote.

The Clay Group currently owns approximately 27%brief description of the Company’s Sharessystem of corporate governance, with reference to the items set out in NI 58-101 and will also own 32.5% of Gauss, which will own half ofNP 58-101 is set forth below.


The Board and management recognize that effective corporate governance is important to the Soledad Project. For so long as the Clay Group beneficially owns at least 25% of the Company, at least one of GQ Holdco’s representatives on the board of managers will be designated by Auvergne. Accordingly, the Clay Group has considerable influence on our corporate affairs and actions, including those submitted to a shareholder vote, and the developmentdirection and operation of the Soledad Project.Company in a manner in which ultimately enhances Shareholder value. As a result, the Company has developed and implemented, and continues to develop, implement and refine formal policies and procedures which reflect its ongoing commitment to good corporate governance. The interestsCompany believes that the corporate governance practices and procedures described below are appropriate for a company such as the Company.

Board of Directors

NP 58-201 recommends that boards of directors of reporting issuers be composed of a majority of independent directors. All three current directors are considered independent. The Board holds regular meetings. Between the scheduled meetings, the Board meets as required. Management also communicates informally with directors on a regular basis, and solicits advice from directors on matters falling within their special knowledge or experience.

Chairman of the Board

With the recent resignation of Thomas M. Clay, Group may be differentthe Company does not currently have an official Chairman of the Board. The Chairman’s primary role is to chair all meetings of the Board and to manage the affairs of the Board, including ensuring the Board is organized properly, functions effectively and meets its obligations and responsibilities. The Chairman’s responsibilities include, among other things, ensuring effective relations and communications among Board members. In his capacity as chairman of the Special Committee, Paul Blythe is acting as the Chairman of the Board.

Director Meetings

The Board meets on a regular basis and holds additional meetings as considered appropriate to deal with the matters arising from your interests.

If Gauss Holdingsdevelopments in the business and Auvergne purchase a significant numberaffairs of Shares pursuantthe Company from time to time. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the Board held four (4) regular meetings. In addition to the Standby Commitment, they willbusiness conducted at such meetings, various other matters were discussed by phone and approved by written resolution signed by all members of the Board.

The Company does not have a policy with regard to Board members’ attendance at annual meetings of Shareholders.

Board Mandate

The Board is responsible for the overall stewardship of the Company. The Board discharges this responsibility directly and through the delegation of specific responsibilities to committees of the Board. The Board works with management to establish goals and strategies for the Company, to identify principal risks, to select and assess senior management and to review significant operational and financial matters. The Board’s mandate is available on the Company’s website atwww.goldenqueen.com.

Position Descriptions

The Board has developed written position descriptions for the Chairman of the Board, the Directors of the Board, each chair of each board committee, and for the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which are available on the Company’s website atwww.goldenqueen.com.

Orientation and Continuing Education

The Company provides new directors with an overview of their role as a member of the Board and its Committees, and the nature and operation of the Company’s business and affairs. New directors also have the abilityopportunity to exert a significant degree of control overdiscuss the Company.

IfCompany’s affairs with legal counsel and with the Company undertakes a rights offeringCompany’s independent auditors. New directors are also provided with opportunities to visit the mine site in Mojave and notare invited to have discussions with the Company’s operating personnel. In 2016, all of the rightsdirectors visited the Soledad Mountain Project and had the opportunity to meet with local stakeholders and tour the project facilities.


The Company does not provide formal continuing education to its Board members, but does encourage them to communicate with management, independent auditors and consultants. Board members are exercisedalso encouraged to participate in industry-related conferences, meetings and education events to maintain their skills and knowledge necessary to meet their obligations as directors of the Company.

Code of Business Conduct

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”), which is distributed to officers, management and employees of the Company. To ensure and monitor compliance with the Code of Conduct, the Board has adopted a Whistle-blower Policy. A request for a waiver of any provision of the Code of Conduct can be made in writing to the Audit Committee, however, such waiver must be approved by holders,the Board. During the recently completed fiscal year, there was no conduct by an officer, by management or an employee that constituted a departure from the Code of Conduct. The Board has also adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. The Company’s Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are available on the Company’s website atwww.goldenqueen.com.

If a director or senior officer has a material interest in a transaction or agreement being considered by the Company, such individual is precluded from voting on the matter and the Board considers such matter without the individual present.

Assessments

Based upon the Company’s size, its current stage of development and the number of individuals on the Board, the Board considers a formal process for assessing the effectiveness and contribution of the Board as a whole, its committees or individual directors to be unnecessary at this time. The Board and its committees meet on numerous occasions during each year, each director having regular opportunity to assess the Board as a whole, its committees, and other directors in relation to assessment of the competencies and skills that the Board as a whole, its committees and directors should possess. The Board will continue to evaluate its own effectiveness and the effectiveness of its committees and individual directors in such manner.

Board Leadership Structure

With the recent resignation of Thomas M. Clay, the Company exercisesdoes not currently have an official Chairman of the right toBoard, however, in his capacity as chairman of the Special Committee, Paul Blythe is acting as the Chairman of the Board. The Company also does not have Gauss Holdingsa lead director. Given the size of the Board and Auvergne purchase Shares pursuantthat all three directors are independent, the directors work well together in the current Board structure and the Board does not believe that selecting a lead independent director would add significant benefits to the Standby Commitment, Gauss HoldingsBoard oversight role.

Also, the Board does not have a formal policy with respect to the consideration of diversity when assessing directors and Auvergne may acquire a significant numberdirector candidates, but considers diversity as part of Shares, which could resultits overall assessment of the Board’s functions and needs.

Board’s Role in Gauss HoldingsRisk Oversight

The understanding, identification and Auvergne holding a significant ownership stakemanagement of risk are essential elements for the successful management of the Company. Management is charged with the day-to-day management of the risks the Company faces. However, the Board, directly and indirectly through its committees, is actively involved in the Company. In addition, if Gauss Holdings and Auvergne are required to take up and pay for a large number of Shares pursuant to the Standby Commitment, the liquidityoversight of the Shares may be negatively impacted.

Gauss Holdings’Company’s risk management policies. The Board is charged with overseeing enterprise risk management, generally, and Auvergne’s agreement to purchase Shares pursuant towith reviewing and discussing with management the Standby Commitment may be terminated under certain circumstances.

Gauss Holdings and Auvergne’s obligation to purchase Shares pursuant to the Standby Commitment at the election of the Company is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions prior to the closing of a rights offering. If Gauss Holdings and Auvergne do not purchase the Shares pursuant to the Standby Commitment, any rights offering may not be fully subscribedCompany’s major risk exposure (whether financial, operating or otherwise) and the anticipated proceeds of a rights offering maysteps management has taken to monitor, control and manage these exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management guidelines and policies. Additionally, the Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s compensation policies generally, in part to determine whether or not be fully realized. The receipt of net proceeds from a rights offering in an amount less than the aggregate amount of fundsthey create risks that are reasonably likely to allow the Company to repay indebtedness and fund the Joint Venture would have a material adverse effect on the Company and on the value and trading price of the Shares as the Company does not currently have sufficient cash or alternate sources of financing available to repay its indebtedness or fund the Joint Venture. Once any rights have commenced trading on the TSX, the Company will be required to proceed with such rights offering, subject to limited exceptions, even if Gauss Holdings and Auvergne do not purchase the Shares pursuant to the Standby Commitment.Company.

Risks Related to the Company and its Operations

The likelihood of continued losses from operations and ability to continue as a going concern.Board Term Limits

The Company has had no revenues from operations since inception and as at March 31, 2014 had a deficitnot adopted term limits for the directors on the Board or other mechanisms of $73,470,250. Losses are expected to continue until such time as we can economically produce and sell gold and silver fromboard renewal because the Soledad Project. Management cannot provide assurancesCompany believes that this will occur and this raises doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.

- 24 -


There are significant risks associated with developing and establishing mining operations, and since we do not have a historythe imposition of producing gold and silver from the Soledad Project, we have no proof that we will be able to develop a profitable mining operation.

The Soledad Project is in the development stage and to date we have not produced gold or silver from the Soledad Project and do not currently generate operating earnings. Advancing the Soledad Projectterm limits for its directors may lead to the production stage will involve significant capital and time, and successful commercial production (if any) will be subject to receiving additional construction-related permits and completionexclusion of constructionpotentially valuable members of the facilities required forBoard. While there is a mining operation. As a result, we are subjectbenefit to risks associated with developing and establishing a mining operation onadding new perspectives to the Soledad Project, including:

the availability of funds to finance development of the Soledad Project on terms acceptable;
the considerable time and cost involved in obtaining construction-related permits and completing construction of the facilities required for a mining operation on the Soledad Project;
the availability and costs of mining and processing equipment and other supplies, as well as the availability of contractors required for construction;
the availability and cost of hiring management and administrative personnel and skilled labour required to run a mining operation on the Soledad Project;
increases in our projected costs due to differences in ore grade, metallurgical performance or revisions to mine plans in response to the physical shape and location of mineralized materials as compared to our 2012 updated feasibility study estimates;
increases in the costs of commodities such as fuel, rubber and electricity, and other materials and supplies which would increase Soledad Project development and operating costs;
the ability to extract sufficient gold and silver from resources and reserves to support a profitable mining operation on the Soledad Project;
compliance with our approvals and permits; and
potential opposition from environmental groups, other non-governmental organizations or local residents which may delay or prevent development of the Soledad Project or affect our future operations.

It is common for mine development programs to experience unexpected problems and delays during construction and commencement of operations. As a result, we may not be successful in establishing a mining operation or profitably producing gold and silver from the Soledad Project.

There are significant risks inherent in mineral production activities, and the possibility that losses will be uninsured.

Development and production of minerals is highly speculative and involves a significant degree of risk. Mineralization of the Soledad Project may turn out to be insufficient in quantity or quality to be profitably mined. We are also subject to significant operating hazards and risks that are normally associated with development and production of minerals, including:

fluctuations in costs that make project development prohibitive, or that make mining uneconomical;
insufficient mineralized material to support a profitable mining operation;
unanticipated variations in ore grade or other geologic problems, or metallurgical or processing problems;
difficult surface conditions, unusual or unexpected geologic formations or failure of open pit slopes;
mechanical or equipment problems;
environmental hazards or pollution;
industrial accidents or personal injury;
fire, flooding, earthquakes, cave-ins or periodic interruptions due to inclement weather;
labor disputes;
and decreases in gold and silver prices, thus decreasing the value of mineralized material.

- 25 -


Any of these hazards and risks can materially and adversely affect, among other things, the development of the Soledad Project, production quantities and rates, costs and expenditures, potential revenues and production dates. They may also result in damage to, or destruction of, production facilities, environmental damage, monetary losses and legal liability.

We currently maintain insurance within ranges of coverage consistent with industry practice in relation to some of these risks, but there are certain risks against which we cannot insure, or against which we cannot maintain insurance at affordable premiums. Insurance against environmental risks (including pollution or other hazards resulting from the disposal of waste products generated from production activities) is not generally available to us. If subjected to environmental liabilities, the costs incurred would reduce funds available for other purposes, and we may have to suspend operations or undertake costly interim compliance measures to address environmental issues.

Mineral resource and reserve estimates are based on interpretation and assumptions, and the Soledad Project may yield lower production of gold and silver under actual operating conditions than is currently estimated.

Unless otherwise indicated, mineral resource and reserve figures presented in our filings with securities regulatory authorities, press releases and other public statements that may be madeBoard from time to time, there are based upon estimates madealso benefits to having continuity and directors having in-depth knowledge of the Company’s business. The Company’s Nominating Committee considers, among other factors, skills, experience, and tenure when identifying potential director nominees.

50 

Gender Diversity

The Company has not adopted a written policy relating to the identification and nomination of women directors and the Company has not adopted a target regarding the representation of women on the Board or in executive officer positions. The Company’s Nominating Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends candidates to become members of the Board with the goal of creating a Board that, as a whole, consists of individuals with various and relevant career experience, industry knowledge and experience, and financial and other specialized experience, while taking diversity into account. The consideration of the level of representation of women on the Board and in executive officer positions is one factor among many that plays a role in the Company’s Nominating Committee’s decision-making process.

As at the date hereof, there are no female directors on the Board or serving as executive officers of the Company.

Board’s Skills Matrix

The following table summarizes the particular areas of expertise for each member of the Board:

Director NameBusiness
Development
Corporate
Governance
FinanceRisk
Management
Capital
Markets
Mining &
Processing
Bryan A. CoatesXXXXX
Bernard GuarneraXXXXX
Paul M. BlytheXXXXX

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating Committee. Each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee, is responsible to the full Board. The functions performed by these committees are summarized below:

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee considers the selection and retention of independent consulting geologistsauditors and mining engineers. When making determinations aboutreviews the scope and results of the audit. In addition, it reviews the adequacy of internal accounting, financial and operating controls and reviews Golden Queen’s financial reporting compliance procedures. As of the Record Date, the members of the Audit Committee are Bryan A. Coates, Paul M. Blythe, and Bernard Guarnera, each of whom is considered independent (in accordance with Item 407(a)(1)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K) as defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, since none of them are believed to have any relationships that, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Bryan A. Coates is the Chair and the “financial expert” of the Audit Committee as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.goldenqueen.com. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the Audit Committee held four (4) meetings, during which all audit committee members were present.

As part of its oversight of our financial reporting process, the directors have: (1) reviewed and discussed with management our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018; (2) received a report from PWC, our independent auditors, on the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, “Communications with Audit Committees”; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the auditors required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence; and (4) considered whether or not the provision of non-audit services by the auditors is compatible with maintaining their independence and has concluded that it is compatible at this time.

Based on the foregoing review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to developthe Board that the audited financial statements should be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on March [♦], 2019.


Submitted by the Audit Committee.

Bryan A. Coates, Chair

Bernard Guarnera, Member

Paul M. Blythe, Member

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the compensation of Golden Queen’s senior management and officers, reviews and administers Golden Queen’s stock option plan and makes recommendations to the Board regarding such matters. As of the Record Date, the members of the Compensation Committee are Bernard Guarnera, Bryan A. Coates and Paul M. Blythe, composed entirely of independent directors. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.goldenqueen.com. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee did not hold a meeting.

Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee assists the Board in providing effective corporate governance. As of the Record Date, the members of the Nominating Committee are Bryan A. Coates, Bernard Guarnera and Paul M. Blythe, composed entirely of independent directors. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.goldenqueen.com. The Nominating Committee does not have a policy with regards to the consideration of any director candidate recommend by Shareholders of the Company and the Board is of the view that it is appropriate for the Company to not have such a policy at this time. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the Nominating Committee did not hold a meeting.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Pursuant to National Instrument 52-110Audit Committees of the Canadian Securities Administrators, the Company is required to disclose annually in its Proxy Statement certain information concerning the constitution of its audit committee and its relationship with its independent auditor, as set forth below.

The primary function of the audit committee (the “Committee”) is to assist the Board in fulfilling its financial oversight responsibilities by reviewing (a) the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to regulatory authorities and shareholders; (b) the systems for internal corporate controls which have been established by the Board and management; and (c) overseeing the Company’s financial reporting processes generally. In meeting these responsibilities the Committee monitors the financial reporting process and internal control system; reviews and appraises the work of external auditors and provides an avenue of communication between the external auditors, senior management and the company’s Board. The Committee is also mandated to review all material related party transactions.

The Audit Committee’s Charter

The Company has adopted an Audit Committee Charter, the text of which can be found on the Company’s website atwww.goldenqueen.com.

Composition of the Audit Committee

As of the Record Date, the Committee was comprised of Bryan A. Coates, Bernard Guarnera, and Paul M. Blythe. All of the Audit Committee members are independent and considered to be financially literate in that each Committee member has the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can presumably be expected to be raised by the Company’s financial statements.

Relevant Education and Experience

Bryan A. Coates currently serves as President of Osisko Gold Royalties since June 2014. Prior to that, he was the Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Osisko Mining. He was responsible for all activities related to financing, financial reporting, marketing relating to the gold industry, risk management and government relations. Mr. Coates has more than 30 years of progressive experience within the international and Canadian mining industry. Mr. Coates has an understanding of the accounting principles used by the Company to prepare its financial statements.


Bernard Guarnera has over 40 years of experience in the global mining industry and is currently President of Broadlands Mineral Advisory Services Ltd. Mr. Guarnera is a director of the board of Behre Dolbear Group Inc., a mining consulting firm founded in 1991. Mr. Guarnera has an understanding of the accounting principles used by the Company to prepare its financial statements.

Paul M. Blythe has over 40 years of experience in the mining industry including significant international experience in corporate management, project development, open pit and underground operations, mergers and acquisitions, and debt and equity financing. He was the founder and President of Quadra FNX Mining and previously worked for Westmin Resources Limited, Placer Dome Canada Limited, Lac Minerals Limited and BHP Billiton. Mr. Blythe has an understanding of the accounting principles used by the Company to prepare its financial statements.

Reliance on Certain Exemptions

Since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed financial year, the Company has not relied on the exemptions contained in sections 2.4, 3.2, 3.3(2), 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8 or Part 8 of NI 52-110.

Audit Committee Oversight

Since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed financial year, the Board has not failed to adopt a recommendation of the Audit Committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has not adopted specific policies and procedures for the engagement of non-audit services. Subject to the requirements of NI 52-110, the engagement of non-audit services is considered by the Board, and where applicable the Audit Committee, on a case-by-case basis.

External Auditor Service Fees

The fees for services provided by PWC to us in the fiscal year ended 2018 and 2017 as follows:

Fees 2018  2017 
Audit Fees(1) C$304,500  C$369,500 
Audit-Related Fees(2)  Nil   Nil 
Tax Fees(3)  Nil   Nil 
All Other Fees(4)  Nil   Nil 
Total C$304,500  C$369,500 

(1)“Audit Fees” include fees necessary to perform the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Audit Fees include fees for review of tax provisions and for accounting consultations on matters reflected in the financial statements. Audit Fees also include audit or other attest services required by legislation or regulation, such as comfort letters, consents, reviews of securities filings and statutory audits. Audit fees also include services related to the review of the Company’s quarterly financial reports.
(2)“Audit-Related Fees” include services that are traditionally performed by the auditor. These audit-related services include employee benefit audits, due diligence assistance, accounting consultations on proposed transactions, internal control reviews and audit or attest services not required by legislation or regulation.
(3)“Tax Fees” include fees for all tax services other than those included in “Audit Fees” and “Audit-Related Fees”. This category includes fees for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. Tax planning and tax advice includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, and requests for rulings or technical advice from tax authorities.
(4)“All Other Fees” include all other non-audit services.

INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

None of the directors, executive officers, employees and their associates, or any former executive officers, directors and employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries:

(a)is or at any time since the beginning of the most recently completed financial year of the company has been, indebted to the Company or any of its subsidiaries; or

(b)whose indebtedness to another entity is, or at any time since the beginning of the most recently completed financial year has been, the subject of a guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar arrangement or understanding provided by the company or any of its subsidiaries.

INTEREST OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

Other than as described in this Proxy Statement, no informed person of the Company, and no associate or affiliate of any such informed person has had any material interest direct or indirect, in any transaction since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed financial year or in any proposed transaction that, in either case, has materially affected or will materially affect the Company or any of its subsidiaries. See “Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon” and “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Proposal 1: Sale of the Soledad Mountain Project we must rely upon” in this Proxy Statement.

MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS

Management functions of Golden Queen are not to any substantial degree performed by anyone other than the directors or executive officers of Golden Queen.

INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

During the past ten years, none of the persons currently serving as executive officers and/or directors of the Company has been the subject matter of any of the following legal proceedings that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K including: (a) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such estimates asperson was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two (2) years prior to that time; (b) any criminal convictions; (c) any order, judgment, or decree permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; (d) any finding by a court or the SEC to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud; or (e) any sanction or order of any self-regulatory organization or registered entity or equivalent exchange, association or entity. Further, no such legal proceedings are believed to be contemplated by governmental authorities against any director or executive officer.

The Company is not aware of any claims, actions, proceedings or investigations pending against the Company, any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent (5%) of the Shares, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate of the Company, or security holder that, individually or in the aggregate, are material to the mineral resourcesCompany. Neither the Company nor its assets and reserves, as well as grades of such mineral resources and reserves. Until we are actually mining and processing material, mineral resources and reserves and grades of mineral resources and reserves mustproperties is subject to any outstanding judgment, order, writ, injunction or decree that has had or would be considered as estimates only.

Estimates can be imprecise and depend upon geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling, which may provereasonably expected to be unreliable. We cannot assure you that the estimates are accurate or that ores from the Soledad Project can be mined or processed profitably.

Any material changes in mineral resource or reserve estimates and grades of resources and reserves will affect the economic viability of placing the Soledad Project into production and the Soledad Project’s return on capital.

As we have not commenced actual production from the Soledad Project, mineral resources and reserves may require adjustments or downward revisions. In addition, the grade of mineralized material ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by our 2012 updated feasibility study. Gold and silver recovered in small scale tests may not be duplicated on a production scale.

Any material reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of our ability to profitably extract gold and silver from our resources and reserves, could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Furthermore, the Company is not aware of any threatened lawsuits.

To the best of our share price andknowledge, there are no legal actions pending, threatened or contemplated against the valueCompany or GQM LLC.

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS

Shareholders who are interested in communicating directly with members of the Soledad Project.Board, or the Board as a group, may do so by writing directly to the individual Board member or the Board generally care of the Corporate Secretary, Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd., Suite 2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 3X2. The Company’s Secretary will forward communications directly to the appropriate Board member. If the correspondence is not addressed to a particular Board member, the communication will be forwarded to a Board member to bring to the attention of the Board. The Company’s Secretary will review all communications prior to forwarding them to the appropriate Board member. The Board has requested that items unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board, such as junk mail and mass mailings, business solicitations, advertisements and other commercial communications, surveys and questionnaires and resumes or other job inquiries, not be forwarded.

There

54 

“HOUSEHOLDING” OF PROXY MATERIALS

SEC rules allow a single copy of this Proxy Statement to be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing the same address and who affirmatively consent, or give their implied consent, to receive a single copy of these materials in a manner provided by applicable SEC rules. This practice is referred to as “householding” and can result in significant savings of paper and mailing costs. Although we do not household for our registered shareholders, some brokers household information circulars and proxy statements, delivering a single copy of each to multiple Shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected Shareholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are differencesnotified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in U.S.householding and Canadian practiceswould prefer to receive a separate copy of our information circulars and proxy statements, or if you are receiving multiple copies of our information circulars and proxy statements and wish to receive only one, please notify your broker. We will deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of this Proxy Statement to a Shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of this Proxy Statement was delivered.

For copies of this Proxy Statement, Shareholders should contact Laurel Hill Advisory Group, our proxy solicitation agent, by telephone at 1-877-452-7184, or by email at assistance@laurelhill.com.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

The deadline has passed for reporting mineral resourcesany proposal that a Shareholder wished to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and reserves.management proxy circular for our 2019 annual meeting of Shareholders as it must have been mailed to the Corporate Secretary of Golden Queen by December 1, 2018. Any Shareholder proposal received after this date will be considered untimely.

Our resource and reserve estimates

OTHER MATTERS

Golden Queen knows of no other matters that are likely to be brought before the Meeting. If, however, other matters not directly comparable to those madepresently known or determined properly come before the Meeting, the persons named as proxies in filings subject to SEC reporting and disclosure requirements, as we generally report mineral resources and reservesthe enclosed Proxy or VIF or their substitutes will vote in accordance with Canadian practices. These practices differ from the practices used to report resource and reserve estimates in reports and other materials filedtheir discretion with the SEC.

It is Canadian practice to report measured, indicated and inferred mineral resources, which are generally not permitted in disclosure filed with the SEC by United States issuers. In the United States, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into reserves. Further, “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. Disclosure of “contained ounces” is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations, however, the SEC only permits issuers to report “resources” as in place, tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.

We are subject to significant governmental regulations, which affect our operations and costs of conducting our business.

Our current and future operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations, including, among others, those relating to:

- 26 -


mineral property acquisition, development and production;
taxes and fees;
labor standards, and occupational health and safety; and
environmental standards for waste disposal, treatment and use of toxic substances, land use and environmental protection.

Companies engaged in development and production activities often experience increased costs and delays as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits. Failure to comply with these may result in enforcement actions, orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities requiring operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or costly remedial actions. We may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of our activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of such laws, regulations and permits.

Existing and possible future laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation, could have a material adverse impact on our business and cause increases in capital expenditures or require abandonment or delays in development of the Soledad Project.

We could incur substantial costs or disruptions to our business if we cannot renew or maintain necessary authorizations and permits.

We must maintain our existing approvals and permits and obtain construction-related permits from regulatory authorities. Delays in obtaining any required construction-related permits, failure to obtain a construction-related permit, or receipt of a construction-related permit with unreasonable conditions or costs, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop the Soledad Project. The failure to obtain necessary construction-related permits could result in an impairment in the carrying value of the Soledad Project.

Our activities are subject to California state and federal environmental laws and regulations that may increase our costs of doing business and restrict our operations.

Our current and planned operations are subject to state and federal environmental laws and regulations. Those laws and regulations provide strict standards for compliance, and potentially significant fines and penalties for non-compliance. These laws address air emissions, waste discharge requirements, management of hazardous substances, protection of endangered species and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations requires significant time and expense, and future changes to these laws and regulations may cause material changes or delays in the development of the Soledad Project or future activities.

U.S. Federal Laws: The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), and comparable state statutes, impose strict, joint and several liability on current and former owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the government to file claims requiring cleanup actions, demands for reimbursement for government incurred cleanup costs, or natural resource damages, or for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and comparable state statutes, govern the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as requirements for corrective actions. CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state statutes can impose liability for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found on exploration, mining and processing sites long after activities on such sites have been completed.

The Clean Air Act, as amended, and comparable state statutes, restrict the emission of air pollutants from many sources, including mining and processing activities. Our mining operations may produce air emissions, including fugitive dust and other air pollutants from stationary equipment, storage facilities and the use of mobile sources such as trucks and heavy construction equipment, which are subject to review, monitoring and/or control requirements under the Clean Air Act and comparable state air quality laws. New facilities may be required to obtain permits before work can begin, and existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in order to remain in compliance. In addition, permitting rules may impose limitations on our production levels or result in additional capital expenditures in order to comply with the rules. The Clean Air Act and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for unauthorized emissions of pollutants.

- 27 -


The Clean Water Act (CWA), and comparable state statutes, impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States, or to the surface or ground waters of the state. The CWA regulates storm water runoff from mining facilities and requires a storm water discharge permit for certain activities. Such a permit requires the regulated facility to monitor and sample storm water run-off from its operations. The CWA and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of pollutants and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release. Violation of these regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by mining related activities may result in fines, penalties, and remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under state laws. In addition, third party claims may be filed by landowners and other parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property damages, and bodily injury.

The Endangered Species Act and comparable state laws are designed to protect critically imperiled species from extinction as a consequence of development. The Company filed a response to statements made in a petition filed on January 31, 2014 with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), which petition sought to list the Mojave Shoulderband snail as a threatened or endangered species. In April 2014, USFWS concluded there was no imminent threat to the snail that would cause them to believe an emergency listing was required, but that USFWS may address the petition in the future, subject to funding. Under the Endangered Species Act if the USFWS determines that the petition contains information that the species is imperiled, it then will proceed with a 90 day screening process to determine if the petition presents substantial information to support listing the subject species as endangered, and if such information exists, the USFWS has a further 12 month period to conduct a detailed assessment of the listing request to approve or deny the listing. The existence of any species listed as endangered under those laws, including as a result of the petition, on Soledad Project lands that are to be disturbed as part of the development and operation of the Soledad Project could increase the costs associated with the Soledad Project or require changes or limitations to the planned project development.

California Laws: At the state level, mining operations are also regulated by the California Department of Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation. State law requires mine operators to hold a permit, which dictates operating controls and closure and post-closure requirements directed at protecting surface and ground water. In addition, state law requires operators to have an approved mine reclamation plan. Local ordinances require the operators to hold Conditional Use Permits. These permits mandate concurrent and post-mining reclamation of mines and require the posting of reclamation financial assurance sufficient to guarantee the cost of closure and reclamation. Any changes to these laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations by, for example, requiring changes to operating constraints, technical criteria, fees or financial assurance requirements.

Regulations and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in increased operating costs.

A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to various climate change interest groups and the potential impact of climate change. Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us and our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs to comply with such regulations. Given the current emotion, political significance and uncertainty around the impact of climate change and how it should be dealt with, we cannot predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial condition and operating performance. Furthermore, even without such regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation. The potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain, and may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages and changing temperatures. These impacts may adversely impact the cost, production and financial performance of our operations.

Agreements with landholders need ongoing monitoring and negotiations.

The Company monitors the status of agreements with landholders on a regular basis in order to protect its interests in the Soledad Project. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to be able to retain all of its interests in the Soledad Project through negotiations with landholders, or that the cost of retaining its interests will not increase significantly as a result of current and future negotiations. The value of the Soledad Project may be significantly reduced if the Company cannot access or mine areas of the property of the Soledad Project that are material, due to its inability to retain its interests in the Soledad Project, acquire additional interests within the Soledad Project boundary, or to expand the Soledad Project boundary. While each and every property has its own value and unique purpose in the overall mine plan, the feasibility of the Soledad Project will depend on the Company’s ability to maintain control of the portions of the property that are material to the Soledad Project. Failure to keep property agreements in good standing may result in a loss of control of the corresponding interest in the Soledad Project, which, if material, would prevent the Company from developing the Soledad Project.

- 28 -


Title to the property of the Soledad Project may be subject to other claims, which could affect our property rights.

There are risks that title to the property of the Soledad Project may be challenged or impugned. The Soledad Project is located in California and may be subject to prior unrecorded agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. There may be valid challenges to the title to the property of the Soledad Project which, if successful, could affect development of the Soledad Project and/or operations. This is particularly the case in respect of those portions of the property in which we hold our interest solely through a lease with landholders, as such interests are substantially based on contract and have been subject to a number of assignments (as opposed to a direct interest in the property).

We hold a number of unpatented mining claims created and maintained in accordance with the General Mining Law of 1872 (the “General Mining Law”). Unpatented mining claims are unique property interests, and are generally considered to be subject to greater title risk than other real property interests because the validity of unpatented mining claims is often uncertain. This uncertainty arises, in part, out of the federal laws and regulations under the General Mining Law. Also, unpatented mining claims may be subject to possible challenges by third parties or validity contests by the federal government. The validity of an unpatented mining claim or mill-site, in terms of both its location and its maintenance, is dependent on strict compliance with a body of U.S. federal law. Should the federal government impose a royalty or additional tax burdens on the properties that lie within public lands, the resulting mining operations could be seriously impacted, depending upon the type and amount of the burden.

Legislation has been proposed that would significantly affect the mining industry.

Members of the United States Congress have repeatedly introduced bills which would supplant or alter the provisions of the United States General Mining Law. If enacted, such legislation could change the cost of holding unpatented mining claims and could significantly impact our ability to mine mineralized material on unpatented mining claims. Such bills have proposed, among other things, to either eliminate or greatly limit the right to a mineral patent and to impose a federal royalty on production from unpatented mining claims. Although we cannot predict what legislated royalties might be, the enactment of these proposed bills could adversely affect our potential to mine mineralized material on unpatented mining claims. Passage of such legislation could adversely affect our financial performance.

The price of gold and silver could adversely affect our future operations and ability to continue development, and eventually operation, of the Soledad Project.

The potential for profitability of operations on the Soledad Project, the value of the Soledad Project, the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise funding to conduct continued development, are directly related to the price of gold and silver. Our decision to develop the Soledad Project must be made long before the first revenue from production would be received. A decrease in the price of gold and silver may prevent the Soledad Project from being economically mined or result in the write-off of assets whose value is impaired as a result of lower gold and silver prices.

The price of gold and silver is affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including inflation, fluctuation of the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, global and regional demand, the sale of gold and silver by central banks, and the political and economic conditions of major gold and silver producing countries throughout the world. The volatility of mineral prices represents a substantial risk which no amount of planning or technical expertise can fully eliminate. If gold or silver prices decline or remain low for prolonged periods of time, we might be unable to continue development of the Soledad Project, which would adversely affect us.

- 29 -


We are a “passive foreign investment company” which may have tax consequences for U.S. investors.

The Company is classified as a passive foreign investment company. A U.S. shareholder who makes a qualified electing fund (“QEF”) election is required to annually include in his or her income his or her pro rata share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gains of the Golden Queen entity, whether or not that entity distributes any amounts to its shareholders. If you do not elect to treat a Golden Queen entity as a QEF, then if the Golden Queen entity is a PFIC for any year during your holding period, adverse tax consequences could result.

U.S. investors should seek independent advice from tax advisors to discuss any tax consequences. Please refer to the Company’s website for the PFIC Information Statement as of December 31, 2013.

Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive.

Reclamation requirements are imposed on companies with mining operations in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance, and this could include a requirement to re-establish pre-disturbance land forms and vegetation.

In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with our potential development activities, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development. We plan to set up a provision for our reclamation obligations on the Soledad Project, as appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial position could be adversely affected.

The mining industry is intensely competitive.

As a result of competition in the mining industry, some of which is with large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and with greater financial and technical resources than ours, we may be unable to effectively develop the Soledad Project or obtain financing on terms we consider acceptable.

We compete with other mining companies in the recruitment and retention of qualified managerial and technical employees. If we are unable to successfully compete for qualified employees, our development of the Soledad Project may be slowed down or suspended. We also compete with other mining companies for capital. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital, our development of the Soledad Project may be jeopardized or we may not be able to develop or operate the Soledad Project.

We rely extensively on the services of our President, Mr. H. Lutz Klingmann, P.Eng., who has considerable current knowledge of our operations, including the Soledad Project, and the loss of his services would likely result in delay and cost associated with acquiring and training additional management.

Mr. Klingmann has been largely responsible for of the operations of the Company, including work on the Soledad Project since 2002. The successful development of the Soledad Project as currently envisioned by management is dependent to a significant extent on the efforts and abilities of Mr. Klingmann. Investors must be willing to rely to a significant extent on management’s discretion and judgment. We do not maintain key employee insurance on Mr. Klingmann and the loss of his services would likely have an adverse effect on Company operations and plans, until such time as a replacement can be located and brought current on Company plans and operations.

Sale of Aggregate

Contributions from the sale of aggregate have not been included in the 2012 updated feasibility study cash flow projections. However, aggregate sales over a period of thirty years are important for the Soledad Project as it will permit the Company to meet its closure and reclamation requirements. If no sale of waste rock as aggregate is ever achieved, the initial mine life would be reduced to approximately ten years.

Three of our directors are ordinarily resident outside of the United States and accordingly it may be difficult to effect service of process on them, or to enforce any legal judgment against them.

Three of our directors namely, Bryan A. Coates, Guy Le Bel and H. Lutz Klingmann are residents of Canada. Consequently, it may be difficult for U.S. investors to effect service of process within the U.S. upon these directors, or to realize in the U.S. upon judgments of U.S. courts predicated upon civil liabilities under the U.S. securities laws. A judgment of a U.S. court predicated solely upon such civil liabilities would probably be enforceable in Canada by a Canadian court if the U.S. court in which the judgment was obtained had jurisdiction, as determined by the Canadian court, in the matter. There is substantial doubt whether or not an original action could be brought successfully in Canada against any of such directors predicated solely upon such civil liabilities.

- 30 -


Our directors and officers may have conflicts of interest as a result of their relationships with other companies.

Our directors and officers are, or may in the future be, directors, officers or shareholders of other companies that are similarly engaged in the business of acquiring, developing and exploiting natural resource properties. Consequently, there is a possibility that our directors and/or officers may be in a position of conflict in the future. In addition, Thomas M. Clay, a director of the Company is a member of the Clay Group, which controls Auvergne, and which will hold a 32.5% interest in Gauss.

Our properties and operations may be subject to litigation or other claims.

From time to time the Soledad Project or our operations may be subject to disputes which may result in litigation or other legal claims. We may be required to assert or defend against these claims which will divert resources and management time from operations. The costs of these claims or adverse filings may have a material effect on our business and results of operations.

Our share price may be volatile and as a result you could lose all or part of your investment.

In addition to volatility associated with equity markets in general, the value of your investment could decline due to the impact of any of the following factors upon the market price of our common shares:

changes in the price for gold or silver;
delays, problems or increased costs in the development of the Soledad Project;
decline in demand for our common stock;
downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates;

investor perception or our industry or prospects; and

general economic trends.

Over the past year, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of securities have been highly volatile. These fluctuations are often unrelated to operating performance and may adversely affect the market price of our common shares. As a result, you may be unable to resell your shares at a desired price.

Because our common shares will likely trade at prices below $5.00 per share, and because we will not be listed on a national U.S. exchange, there are additional regulations imposed on U.S. broker-dealers trading in our shares that may make it more difficult for you to buy and resell our shares through a U.S. broker-dealer.

Because of U.S. rules that apply to shares with a market price of less than $5.00 per share, known as the “penny stock rules”, investors will find it more difficult to sell their securities in the U.S. through a U.S. broker dealer. The penny stock rules will probably apply to trades in our shares. These rules in most cases require a broker-dealer to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document to a potential purchaser of the securities, along with additional information including current bid and offer quotations, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account, and to make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction.

A failure to satisfy the continued listing criteria of the TSX could result in our common shares being delisted.

Our Shares are currently listed on the TSX. In order to maintain the listing, we must maintain certain share prices, financial, and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum amount of shareholders’ equity and a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to objective standards, the TSX may delist the securities of any issuer in a variety of circumstances including if, in its opinion, the issuer’s financial condition and/or operating results appear unsatisfactory; if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to make continued listing on the TSX inadvisable; if the issuer sells or disposes of principal operating assets or ceases to be an operating company; if an issuer fails to comply with the listing requirements of the TSX; or if any other event occurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing on the TSX, in their opinion, inadvisable or unwarranted.

- 31 -


If the TSX delists our Shares, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity, decreased analyst coverage of our securities, and an inability for us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.

Issuing additional equity may have a negative impact on the trading price of our securities and our current shareholders may suffer dilution.

Any future sale of equity capital in financing transactions or through the exercise of warrants or options or conversion of convertible securities will result in dilution to existing shareholders. In addition, even the perception that an issuance of equity capital may occur could have a negative impact on the trading price of our securities. We may pursue other alternatives for financing through offering an interest in the Soledad Project to another party or parties.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Proxy Statement constitute forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively “forward-looking statements”). The use of any of the words “anticipate”, “continue”, “expect”, “may”, “will”, “proposed”, “should”, “believe”, “is subject” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. The Company believes the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. Such forward-looking statements included in this Proxy Statement should not be unduly relied upon. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

In particular, this Proxy Statement includes forward-looking statements pertaining to the following:

completion of the Joint Venture;
business strategy, strength and focus;
use of the proceeds of the Joint Venture;
receipt of all regulatory, shareholder and other approvals for the Joint Venture;
development and construction activities planned for the Soledad Project;
expectations regarding the ability to raise capital or generate income through operations;
the closing of the transactions contemplated under the Transaction Agreement and the JV Agreement;
the estimated proceeds from additional agreements to fund the Joint Venture and the projections for a fully funded project;
plans for and intentions with respect to capital requirements;
construction and other development activities on the Soledad Project;
expectations related to management and operation of GQ California and future mining operations on the Soledad Project; and

expectations with respect to the Company’s future working capital position.

With respect to forward-looking statements contained in this Proxy Statement, assumptions have been made regarding:such matters.

future commodity prices;
future development plans for the Soledad Project unfolding as currently envisioned;
geological estimates in respect of mineral resources and reserves on the Soledad Project;
the Company’s ability to obtain qualified staff and equipment in a timely and cost-efficient manner;
the legal and regulatory framework governing mining, royalties, taxes and environmental matters in California;
the ability of the Company to make payments required to maintain its interest in the Joint Venture;
future sources of funding, the Company’s ability to obtain financing, and its future debt levels; and
future exchange rates of Canadian and U.S. currencies being consistent with expectations.

- 32 -


Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, including, without limitation, risk and uncertainties regarding:

the speculative nature of exploration, appraisal and development of mineral properties;

conditions required for the closing of the Transaction Agreement and the JV Agreement;
the transfer of 50% of our interest in the Soledad Project;
failure to fund our Top Up Right in accordance with the JV Agreement and related dilution in GQ California;
required shareholder and regulatory approvals;
the development and operation of the Soledad Project, including additional capital requirements for the Soledad Project, accidents, equipment breakdowns and non-compliance with environmental and permit requirements;
uncertainties in access to future funding for exploration and development of the Company’s properties or future acquisitions;
unexpected liabilities or changes in the cost of operations, including costs of extracting and delivering minerals to market, that affect potential profitability of the Company;
operating hazards and risks inherent in mineral exploration and mining;
volatility in global equities, commodities, foreign exchange, market price of precious and base metals and a lack of market liquidity;
changes to the political environment, laws or regulations, or more stringent enforcement of current laws or regulations in California;
ability of the Company to obtain and maintain required exploration licences, concessions, access rights or permits;
unexpected and uninsurable risks;
limitations on the transfer of cash or assets between the Company and its foreign subsidiaries or among such subsidiaries could restrict the Company’s ability to fund its operations efficiently;
the other factors discussed under “Risk Factors”.

Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists of factors are not exhaustive. The material factors and assumptions used in developing the forward-looking statements are based on, among other things, the Company’s planned capital expenditure program, estimated recovery success rates and other prospects. Due to the nature of the mining industry, budgets are regularly reviewed in light of the success of the expenditures and other opportunities, which may become available to the Company. Accordingly, while the Company anticipates that it will have the ability to spend the funds available to it as stated in this Proxy Statement, there may be circumstances where, for sound business reasons, a reallocation of funds may be prudent or necessary.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Proxy Statementare expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Except as required under applicable securities laws, the Company does not undertake or assume any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. Shareholders should read this entire Proxy Statement and consult their own professional advisors to assess the legal issues, risk factors and other aspects of the Joint Venture prior to voting their Shares.

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS

Shareholders can send communications to the Board by email at astgermain@goldenqueen.com or through our website at www.goldenqueen.com.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the SEDARCompany’s website at www.goldenqueen.com, on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. The Company will furnish to Shareholders, free of charge, a hard copy of the Company’s financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis and/or a hard copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 upon request by (i) mail to: 2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6E 3X2 or (ii) telephone to: 1-778-373-1557 or (iii) email to: info@goldenqueen.com. Financial information is provided in the Company’s comparativeannual financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis for its most recently completed financial year,fiscal year.

OTHER MATERIAL FACTS

There are no other material facts to the knowledge of the Board relating to the matters for which will be available onlinethis Proxy Statement is issued which are not disclosed herein.

MISCELLANEOUS

If you have any questions about the Transaction or Consolidation, please contact Brenda Dayton, Corporate Secretary, by telephone atwww.sedar.com. Shareholders may request additional copies 1-778-373-1557, or by (i) mail to: 6411 Imperial Avenue, West Vancouver, BC, V7W 2J5; (ii)email at info@goldenqueen.com. If you need assistance with the completion and delivery of your Proxy or VIF, please contact Laurel Hill Advisory Group, our proxy solicitation agent, by telephone to: (604) 921-7570at 1-877-452-7184, or (iii)by email to: bdayton@goldenqueen.com.at assistance@laurelhill.com.


YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS DATED APRIL [♦], 2019. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THAT DATE. NEITHER THE MAILING OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS NOR THE COMPLETION OF THE TRANSACTION CREATES ANY IMPLICATION TO THE CONTRARY. THIS PROXY STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE SOLICITATION OF A PROXY IN ANY JURISDICTION TO OR FROM ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION IN THAT JURISDICTION.

- 33 -


CERTIFICATE

Dated at

The contents and the sending of this Proxy Statement have been approved by the Board.

By Order of the Board of Directors of

GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.

Paul M. Blythe

Director

Vancouver, British Columbia this <> day of <>

[♦], 2014.2019


BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSSCHEDULE A

 

______________________
H. Lutz Klingmann
President, CEO and Director

- 34 -


CONSENT OF MAXIT CAPITAL LPERNST & YOUNG LLP

We refer to the formal valuation and fairness opinion dated June 7, 2014,[♦], 2019, which we prepared for Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. forin connection with the joint venture to be owned by Gauss LLC andsale of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.Holdings Inc. to a group of purchasers including Thomas M. Clay and certain members of the Clay family and associated entities. We consent to the filing of the formal valuation and fairness opinion with the securities regulatory authority and the inclusion of a summary of the formal valuation and the formal valuation,fairness opinion in this document.

 

MAXIT CAPITAL LP
[♦]

Toronto, Ontario
<>

[♦], 2014
2019


A-1 

SCHEDULE B

DISSENT RIGHTS

SCHEDULE A
VALUATIONDIVISION 2 OF PART 8 OF THEBUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT (BRITISH COLUMBIA)

 

181 Bay Street, Suite 830
Toronto, ON, M5J 2T3Definitions and application

June 7, 2014

Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.
6411 Imperial Avenue
West Vancouver, BC V7W 2J5237 (1) In this Division:

To

"dissenter" means a shareholder who, being entitled to do so, sends written notice of dissent when and as required by section 242;

"notice shares" means, in relation to a notice of dissent, the Special Committee of the Board of Directors:

Maxit Capital LP (“Maxit Capital”, “we” or “us”) understands that Gauss LLC (“Gauss”), a joint venture to be owned 67.5% by Leucadia National Corporation (“Leucadia”) and 32.5% by certain members of the Clay family (“Clay Family”, and together with Leucadia the “Acquirors”) and Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd (“Golden Queen” or the “Company”) propose to effect a transaction (the “Transaction”) whereby:

i.

Golden Queen will convert its wholly-owned subsidiary that is developing the Soledad Mountain Project (the “Project”), Golden Queen Mining Company, Inc., into a California limited liability company (“GQ California”);

ii.

Gauss will acquire membership interests of GQ California representing 50% of the total membership interests to be issued and outstanding after giving effect to such issuance (the “GQ California Interest”) for US$110 million payable in cash to GQ California; and

iii.

On closing of the Transaction, Golden Queen, through a wholly-owned subsidiary (“GQ Holdco”), and Gauss will each own 50% of GQ California and will enter into a joint venture agreement (the “JV Agreement”) that will govern the management of the Project, the obligations of the parties in connection with further funding requirements and ownership of GQ California.

The terms and conditions of the Transaction are more fully described in the transaction agreement dated June 8, 2014 (the “Transaction Agreement”). We also understand that the Company’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors”) has appointed a special committee (the “Special Committee”) to consider the Transaction and to make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the Transaction.

Engagement of Maxit Capital

By letter agreement dated January 11, 2014 (the “Engagement Agreement”), the Special Committee retained Maxit Capital to act as its financial advisor in connection with a joint venture to finance the construction of the Project. Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, the Special Committee has requested that we prepare a formal valuation of the GQ California Interest (the “Valuation”) and an opinion (the “Opinion”) as to whether the consideration to be received by Golden Queen pursuant to the Transaction is fair from a financial point of view to Golden Queen.

Maxit Capital will be paid a fee for rendering this Valuation and will be paid an additional fee for the Opinion, neither of which are contingent upon the conclusions reached in the Valuation or Opinion or on the completion of the Transaction. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Maxit Capital for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and to indemnify Maxit Capitalshares in respect of certain liabilities that might arise outwhich dissent is being exercised under the notice of our engagement.dissent;

The Valuation herein is contingent upon the conditions set forth

"payout value" means,

(a)in the case of a dissent in respect of a resolution, the fair value that the notice shares had immediately before the passing of the resolution,

(b)in the case of a dissent in respect of an arrangement approved by a court order made under Section 291(2)(c) that permits dissent, the fair value that the notice shares had immediately before the passing of the resolution adopting the arrangement,

(c)in the case of a dissent in respect of a matter approved or authorized by any other court order that permits dissent, the fair value that the notice shares had at the time specified by the court order, or

(d)in the case of a dissent in respect of a community contribution company, the value of the notice shares set out in the regulations,

excluding any appreciation or depreciation in the Assumptions and Limitations section and may not be used by any person or relied upon by any person without the express prior written consent of Maxit Capital.


Unless otherwise noted, all monetary values contained within this report are expressed in US dollar amounts (“$”).

Credentials of Maxit Capital

Maxit Capital is an independent advisory firm with expertise in mergers and acquisitions. The opinions expressed herein are the opinions of Maxit Capital and the form and content herein have been approved for release by its managing partners, each of whom is experienced in merger, acquisition, divestiture, and valuation matters.

Independence of Maxit Capital

Neither Maxit Capital, nor any of our affiliates, is an insider, associate or affiliate (as those terms are defined in theSecurities Act (Ontario) or the rules made thereunder)anticipation of the Company,corporate action approved or authorized by the Acquirors,resolution or court order unless exclusion would be inequitable.

(2) This Division applies to any right of their respective associates or affiliates (collectively, the "Interested Parties").

Maxit Capital has not been engaged to provide any financial advisory services nor has it participated in any financings involving the Interested Parties within the past two years, other than acting as financial advisordissent exercisable by a shareholder except to the Special Committee pursuantextent that

(a)the court orders otherwise, or

(b)in the case of a right of dissent authorized by a resolution referred to in Section 238(1)(g), the court orders otherwise or the resolution provides otherwise.

Right to dissent

238 (1) A shareholder of a company, whether or not the Engagement Agreement.shareholder's shares carry the right to vote, is entitled to dissent as follows:

There are no other understandings, agreements or commitments between Maxit Capital and any of the Interested Parties

(a)under Section 260, in respect of a resolution to alter the articles

(i)to alter restrictions on the powers of the company or on the business the company is permitted to carry on, or

(ii)without limiting subparagraph (i), in the case of a community contribution company, to alter any of the company's community purposes within the meaning of section 51.91;

(b)under Section 272, in respect of a resolution to adopt an amalgamation agreement;

(c)under Section 287, in respect of a resolution to approve an amalgamation under Division 4 of Part 9;

(d)in respect of a resolution to approve an arrangement, the terms of which arrangement permit dissent;

(e)under Section 301(5), in respect of a resolution to authorize or ratify the sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the company's undertaking;

(f)under Section 309, in respect of a resolution to authorize the continuation of the company into a jurisdiction other than British Columbia;

(g)in respect of any other resolution, if dissent is authorized by the resolution;

(h)in respect of any court order that permits dissent.

(2) A shareholder wishing to dissent must

(a)prepare a separate notice of dissent under Section 242 for

(i)the shareholder, if the shareholder is dissenting on the shareholder's own behalf, and

(ii)each other person who beneficially owns shares registered in the shareholder's name and on whose behalf the shareholder is dissenting,

(b)identify in each notice of dissent, in accordance with Section 242(4), the person on whose behalf dissent is being exercised in that notice of dissent, and

(c)dissent with respect to all of the shares, registered in the shareholder's name, of which the person identified under paragraph (b) of this subsection is the beneficial owner.

(3) Without limiting subsection (2), a person who wishes to have dissent exercised with respect to any current or future business dealingsshares of which would be material to the Valuation. Maxit Capital may inperson is the ordinary course of business provide financial advisory, investment banking, or other financial services to one or more of the Interested Parties from time to time.beneficial owner must

Scope of Review

In connection with preparing the Valuation, we have reviewed and relied upon, among other things, the following:

i.

the draft of the Transaction Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

ii.

(a)

the draft of the Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

iii.

the draft of the Expense Reimbursement Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

iv.

the draft of the Equity Commitment Letter dated June 4, 2014;

v.

the draft of the Voting and Support Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

vi.

the draft of the Gauss, LLC Operating Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

vii.

certain other internal financial, operating, corporate and other information prepared or provided by or on behalf of Golden Queen concerning the business operations, assets, liabilities and prospects of Golden Queen and GQ California;

viii.

internal management forecasts, development and operating projections, estimates (including future estimates or mineable resources) and budgets prepared or provided by or on behalf of Golden Queen and GQ California;

ix.

discussions with management of Golden Queen relating to Golden Queen and GQ California’s current business plan, operations, financial condition, prospects and related matters;

x.

discussions with the Acquirors relating to their respective businesses, operations, financial conditions, prospects and related matters;

xi.

public information relating to the business and financial condition of Golden Queen and GQ California;

xii.

public informationdissent with respect to selected public companies we considered relevant;

all of the shares, if any, of which the person is both the registered owner and the beneficial owner, and

xiii.

public information(b)

cause each shareholder who is a registered owner of any other shares of which the person is the beneficial owner to dissent with respect to selected precedent transactions we considered relevant;

all of those shares.

Waiver of right to dissent

239 (1) A shareholder may not waive generally a right to dissent but may, in writing, waive the right to dissent with respect to a particular corporate action.

(2) A shareholder wishing to waive a right of dissent with respect to a particular corporate action must

xiv.

various equity research reports and industry sources we considered relevant;

xv.

(a)

a certificate addressed to us, dated as of the date hereof, from two senior officers of the Company asprovide to the completeness and accuracy of the Information (as defined below) provided to Maxit Capital in respect of Golden Queen and GQ California; and

company a separate waiver for

2



xvi.

such(i)

the shareholder, if the shareholder is providing a waiver on the shareholder's own behalf, and

(ii)each other information, investigations, analyses and discussions (including discussions with the management of the Company, the Company’s external legal counsel, and other third parties) as we considered necessary or appropriateperson who beneficially owns shares registered in the circumstances.

shareholder's name and on whose behalf the shareholder is providing a waiver, and

To

(b)identify in each waiver the person on whose behalf the waiver is made.

(3) If a shareholder waives a right of dissent with respect to a particular corporate action and indicates in the best of its knowledge, Maxit Capital has not been denied access bywaiver that the Companyright to any material information it has requested specifically regardingdissent is being waived on the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including GQ California.

Prior Valuations

The Company has representedshareholder's own behalf, the shareholder's right to Maxit Capital that no prior valuations (as defined in MultiIateral Instrument 61-101 -Protection of Minority Securityholders in Special Transactions)dissent with respect to the particular corporate action terminates in respect of the Project,shares of which the Company, GQ California or shareholder is both the registered owner and the beneficial owner, and this Division ceases to apply to

B-2 

(a)the shareholder in respect of the shares of which the shareholder is both the registered owner and the beneficial owner, and

(b)any other shareholders, who are registered owners of shares beneficially owned by the first mentioned shareholder, in respect of the shares that are beneficially owned by the first mentioned shareholder.

(4) If a shareholder waives a right of their subsidiaries have been prepareddissent with respect to a particular corporate action and indicates in the past 24 months.

Assumptions and Limitations

Withwaiver that the Special Committee’s permission and subjectright to dissent is being waived on behalf of a specified person who beneficially owns shares registered in the exercise of our professional judgment, Maxit Capital has relied upon, and has assumed the completeness, accuracy and fair presentation of all financial and other information, data, advice, opinions and representations obtained by us from public sources, or provided to us by the Company or its affiliates or advisors or otherwise obtained by us pursuant to our engagement (the “Information”). The Valuation is conditional upon such completeness, accuracy and fair presentationname of the Information. We have not been requestedshareholder, the right of shareholders who are registered owners of shares beneficially owned by that specified person to or attempted to verify independently the accuracy, completeness or fairnessdissent on behalf of presentation of the Information. We have not met separatelythat specified person with the independent auditors of the Company in connection with preparing this Valuation and with the Special Committee’s permission, we have assumed the accuracy and fair presentation of, and relied upon, the audited financial statements of the Company and the reports of the auditors thereon and the interim unaudited financial statements of the Company.

With respect to the Information providedparticular corporate action terminates and this Division ceases to us concerning the Company that constitute forecasts, projections, estimates or budgets and relied uponapply to those shareholders in our financial analyses, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the most reasonable assumptions, estimates and judgments of managementrespect of the Company, having regardshares that are beneficially owned by that specified person.

Notice of resolution

240 (1) If a resolution in respect of which a shareholder is entitled to dissent is to be considered at a meeting of shareholders, the Company’s business, plans, financial condition and prospects.

The Company has represented to us, in a certificatecompany must, at least the prescribed number of two senior officersdays before the date of the Company datedproposed meeting, send to each of its shareholders, whether or not their shares carry the right to vote,

(a)a copy of the proposed resolution, and

(b)a notice of the meeting that specifies the date of the meeting, and contains a statement advising of the right to send a notice of dissent.

(2) If a resolution in respect of which a shareholder is entitled to dissent is to be passed as a consent resolution of shareholders or as a resolution of directors and the earliest date hereof, among other things,on which that resolution can be passed is specified in the Information providedresolution or in the statement referred to us byin paragraph (b), the company may, at least 21 days before that specified date, send to each of its shareholders, whether or not their shares carry the right to vote,

(a)a copy of the proposed resolution, and

(b)a statement advising of the right to send a notice of dissent.

(3) If a resolution in respect of which a shareholder is entitled to dissent was or is to be passed as a resolution of shareholders without the company complying with subsection (1) or (2), or was or is to be passed as a directors' resolution without the company complying with subsection (2), the company must, before or within 14 days after the passing of the resolution, send to each of its shareholders who has not, on behalf of every person who beneficially owns shares registered in the Company, includingname of the written information and discussions concerningshareholder, consented to the Company referredresolution or voted in favour of the resolution, whether or not their shares carry the right to above undervote,

(a)a copy of the resolution,

(b)a statement advising of the right to send a notice of dissent, and

(c)if the resolution has passed, notification of that fact and the date on which it was passed.

(4) Nothing in subsection (1), (2) or (3) gives a shareholder a right to vote in a meeting at which, or on a resolution on which, the heading “Scopeshareholder would not otherwise be entitled to vote.

Notice of Review”, are complete and correct atcourt orders

241 If a court order provides for a right of dissent, the date the Information was provided to us and that, sincecompany must, not later than 14 days after the date on which the Information was provided to us, there has been no material change, financial or otherwise, in the financial condition, assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise), business, operations or prospectscompany receives a copy of the Companyentered order, send to each shareholder who is entitled to exercise that right of dissent

(a)a copy of the entered order, and

(b)a statement advising of the right to send a notice of dissent.

Notice of dissent

242 (1) A shareholder intending to dissent in respect of a resolution referred to in Section 238(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) or any(f) must,

(a)if the company has complied with Section 240(1) or (2), send written notice of dissent to the company at least 2 days before the date on which the resolution is to be passed or can be passed, as the case may be,

(b)if the company has complied with Section 240(3), send written notice of dissent to the company not more than 14 days after receiving the records referred to in that section, or

(c)if the company has not complied with Section 240(1), (2) or (3), send written notice of dissent to the company not more than 14 days after the later of

(i)the date on which the shareholder learns that the resolution was passed, and

(ii)the date on which the shareholder learns that the shareholder is entitled to dissent.

(2) A shareholder intending to dissent in respect of its affiliatesa resolution referred to in Section 238(1)(g) must send written notice of dissent to the company

(a)on or before the date specified by the resolution or in the statement referred to in Section 240(2)(b) or (3) (b) as the last date by which notice of dissent must be sent, or

(b)if the resolution or statement does not specify a date, in accordance with subsection (1) of this section.

(3) A shareholder intending to dissent under Section 238(1)(h) in respect of a court order that permits dissent must send written notice of dissent to the company

(a)within the number of days, specified by the court order, after the shareholder receives the records referred to in Section 241, or

(b)if the court order does not specify the number of days referred to in paragraph (a) of this subsection, within 14 days after the shareholder receives the records referred to in Section 241.

(4) A notice of dissent sent under this section must set out the number, and no material change has occurredthe class and series, if applicable, of the notice shares, and must set out whichever of the following is applicable:

(a)if the notice shares constitute all of the shares of which the shareholder is both the registered owner and beneficial owner and the shareholder owns no other shares of the company as beneficial owner, a statement to that effect;

(b)if the notice shares constitute all of the shares of which the shareholder is both the registered owner and beneficial owner but the shareholder owns other shares of the company as beneficial owner, a statement to that effect and

(i)the names of the registered owners of those other shares,

(ii)the number, and the class and series, if applicable, of those other shares that are held by each of those registered owners, and

(iii)a statement that notices of dissent are being, or have been, sent in respect of all of those other shares;

(c)if dissent is being exercised by the shareholder on behalf of a beneficial owner who is not the dissenting shareholder, a statement to that effect and

(i)the name and address of the beneficial owner, and

(ii)a statement that the shareholder is dissenting in relation to all of the shares beneficially owned by the beneficial owner that are registered in the shareholder's name.

(5) The right of a shareholder to dissent on behalf of a beneficial owner of shares, including the shareholder, terminates and this Division ceases to apply to the shareholder in the Information or any part thereof which would have or which would reasonably be expectedrespect of that beneficial owner if subsections (1) to have a material effect on the Valuation.

We(4) of this Section, as those subsections pertain to that beneficial owner, are not legal, taxcomplied with.

Notice of intention to proceed

243 (1) A company that receives a notice of dissent under Section 242 from a dissenter must,

(a)if the company intends to act on the authority of the resolution or court order in respect of which the notice of dissent was sent, send a notice to the dissenter promptly after the later of

(i)the date on which the company forms the intention to proceed, and

(ii)the date on which the notice of dissent was received, or

(b)if the company has acted on the authority of that resolution or court order, promptly send a notice to the dissenter.

(2) A notice sent under subsection (1)(a) or accounting experts and we express no opinion concerning any legal, tax or accounting matters concerning the Transaction or the sufficiency(b) of this letter for your purposes. The Valuation is renderedsection must

(a)be dated not earlier than the date on which the notice is sent,

(b)state that the company intends to act, or has acted, as the case may be, on the authority of the resolution or court order, and

(c)advise the dissenter of the manner in which dissent is to be completed under Section 244.

Completion of dissent

244 (1) A dissenter who receives a notice under Section 243 must, if the basis of securities markets, economic and general business and financial conditions prevailing as at the close of business on June 5, 2014 and the conditions and prospects, financial and otherwise, of the Company and the Acquirors as they are reflected in the Information and as they were representeddissenter wishes to us in our discussions with management of the Company and its affiliates and advisors. In our analyses and in connectionproceed with the preparation of our Valuation, we made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, markets and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of any party involved in the Transaction.

3


The Valuation is being provideddissent, send to the Special Committee forcompany or its exclusive use only in considering the Transaction and may not be published, disclosed to any other person, relied upon by any other person, or used for any other purpose, without the prior written consent of Maxit Capital. The Valuation is not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company with respect to the Transaction.

Maxit Capital believes that its financial analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and the factors considered by it, without considering all factors and analyses together, could create a misleading view of the process underlying the Valuation. The preparation of a valuation is complex and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description and any attempt to carry out such could lead to undue emphasis on any particular factor or analysis.

The valuation methodology employed by Maxit Capital requires the development of long-range financial projectionstransfer agent for the GQ California, which reflect numerous assumptions regarding the impact of general economic and industry conditions on their future financial results. While Maxit Capital believes the assumptions used are appropriate in the circumstances, some or all of the assumptions may prove to be incorrect.

The Valuation is given as of the date hereof and, although we reserve the right to change or withdraw the Valuation if we learn that any of the information that we relied upon in preparing the Valuation was inaccurate, incomplete or misleading in any material respect, we disclaim any obligation to change or withdraw the Valuation, to advise any person of any change that may come to our attention or to update the Valuationnotice shares, within one month after the date of the notice,

(a)a written statement that the dissenter requires the company to purchase all of the notice shares,

(b)the certificates, if any, representing the notice shares, and

(c)if Section 242(4)(c) applies, a written statement that complies with subsection (2) of this section.

(2) The written statement referred to in subsection (1)(c) must

(a)be signed by the beneficial owner on whose behalf dissent is being exercised, and

(b)set out whether or not the beneficial owner is the beneficial owner of other shares of the company and, if so, set out

(i)the names of the registered owners of those other shares,

(ii)the number, and the class and series, if applicable, of those other shares that are held by each of those registered owners, and

(iii)that dissent is being exercised in respect of all of those other shares.

(3) After the dissenter has complied with subsection (1),

(a)the dissenter is deemed to have sold to the company the notice shares, and

(b)the company is deemed to have purchased those shares, and must comply with Section 245, whether or not it is authorized to do so by, and despite any restriction in, its memorandum or articles.

(4) Unless the court orders otherwise, if the dissenter fails to comply with subsection (1) of this Valuation.

This Valuation has been preparedsection in accordance withrelation to notice shares, the guidelinesright of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (‘‘IDA’’)dissenter to dissent with respect to those notice shares terminates and Standard No. 110 of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators (‘‘CICBV’’), but neither the IDA nor the CICBV has been involved in the preparation or review of the Valuation.

Overview of Golden Queen

Golden Queen is a Canadian natural resource company engaged in the exploration and development of precious metal deposits in North America. The Company was formed in November 1985 to acquire GQ California, which had secured, by agreement, a core group of claims on the Project and has since added to its holdings in the area. Prior to giving effect to the Transaction, GQ California is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Queen. GQ California is also the operator of the Project. The Company’s corporate structure is detailed in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 – Golden Queen’s Current Corporate Structure

4


Table 1 below outlines the Company’s share structure and market capitalization as at the date hereof.

Table 1 – Golden Queen Market Snapshot
Share Price (TSX)(C$)$1.34
Share Price (OTCQX)   (US$)$1.22
Basic Shares Outstanding(MM)99.8
Fully Diluted In-the-Money Shares Outstanding(MM)100.2
Fully Diluted In-the-Money Market Capitalization(1)(US$MM)$123
(1) Based on the share price on the TSX. Assumes a CAD:USD exchange rate of 0.9128.

Overview of the Project

The Project is a gold-silver project located approximately 5 miles south of Mojave in Kern County, southern California. GQ California holds or controls via agreement 33 patented lode mining claims, 134 unpatented lode mining claims, 1 patented millsite, 12 unpatented millsites, 1 unpatented placer claim and 867 acres of fee land. Since acquiring the Project, GQ California has performed extensive exploration and development activities on the property and construction of infrastructure on the Project has been underway since July 1, 2013.

Access to site is from State Route 14 and an existing paved County road. A power line crosses the property boundary and the water supply and railroad are located within approximately one mile from the Project.

In February 2012, AMEC E&C Services, Inc. (“AMEC”) prepared updated mineral resource estimates for the Project. The mineral resource estimates prepared by AMEC are set out in Table 2 below.

Table 2 – Soledad Mountain Project Mineral Resource Estimates (Effective Date: February 29, 2012)
      
  In-Situ GradeContained Metal
ClassificationTonnesGold (g/t)Silver (g/t)Gold (oz)Silver (oz)
Measured26,727,0000.8513.29729,00011,403,000
Indicated118,090,0000.448.531,675,00032,301,000
Total Measured & Indicated144,817,0000.529.422,404,00043,704,000
Inferred14,545,0000.367.89169,0003,681,000

Note: Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves.

In October 2012, the Company released the results of an updated National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report prepared by Norwest Corporation (“Norwest”) titled “Soledad Mountain Project – Technical Report” with an effective date of October 17, 2012 (the “Feasibility Study”). The Feasibility Study provided an analysis of the economic and financial feasibility of developing and operating the Project. As part of their analysis, Norwest used the updated resource information provided by AMEC to prepare updated mineral reserve estimates for the Project. The mineral reserve estimates prepared by Norwest are set out in Table 3 below.

5



Table 3 – Soledad Mountain Project Mineral Reserve Estimates (Effective Date: August 31, 2012)
      
  In-Situ GradeContained Metal
ClassificationTonnesGold (g/t)Silver (g/t)Gold (oz)Silver (oz)
Proven18,371,0000.9114.49537,7008,558,500
Probable42,237,0000.5310.58717,90014,372,500
Total Proven & Probable60,608,0000.6411.771,255,60022,931,000

The Feasibility Study contemplates the use of conventional open pit mining methods and the cyanide heap leach and Merrill-Crowe processes to recover gold and silver from crushed, agglomerated ore. The permitted combined ore and waste mining rate is 14 million tons per year. The Company is also actively pursuing a by-product aggregate business once the heap leach operation is in full production, however, no contributions from the sale of aggregate have been included in the Valuation.

Definition of Fair Market Value

The Valuation has been prepared based on techniques that Maxit Capital considers appropriate in the circumstances, after considering all relevant facts and taking into account our assumptions, in order to arrive at “fair market value” of GQ California. In this context and for the purposes of the Valuation, “fair market value” is defined as the price available in an open and unrestricted market between informed, prudent parties, acting at arm’s length and under no compulsion to act, expressed in terms of money or money’s worth.

Values determined herein and on the foregoing basis represent the “market trading” values of GQ California. Market trading values represent the expected price an acquirer would be required to pay to obtain lessDivision, other than a majority of the voting interests of GQ California. Given the quantity of funds being financed through the Transaction relative to the market capitalization of the Company, we have felt that it is appropriate to take into consideration typical price discounts required to complete a large financing in the public or private markets.

Approach and Description of Valuation Methodologies

Net Asset Value Analysis

Maxit Capital valued GQ California based on a net asset value (“NAV”) approach. This approach involves attributing values to each of a company’s assets and liabilities, as applicable, using the assumptions and methodologies appropriate in each case and reflects the risks, prospects and profitability of each asset. As a result, NAV analysis is the fundamental method used to value mining assets and their associated liabilities which are, by nature, each subject to a variety of unique factors.

GQ California’s only assets and liabilities are derived from the Project and therefore, the value of GQ California can be estimated by determining the net present value (“NPV”) of the Project’s future cash flows. At present, there are no corporate general and administrative expenses incurred by GQ California that are not related to the Project and as such do not need to be calculated separately.

Maxit Capital relied primarily on a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) approach to evaluate the NPV of the Project. NPV estimates from third-party independent research reports were also reviewed given that the market trading multiple analysis (outlined below) was based on street consensus estimates.

6


Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

The DCF approach calculates a value of an asset by taking into account the amount, timing and relative certainty of projected unlevered free cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. The DCF approach requires that certain assumptions be made regarding, among other things, mine operating assumptions and future commodity prices to estimate the future unlevered free cash flows of the asset. The possibility that some of the assumptions will prove to be inaccurate is one factor involved in the determination of the discount rates used to discount the unlevered free cash flows to present value. The unlevered free cash flows and discount rates were considered on a real, constant dollar basis rather than on a nominal dollar basis.

As a basis for the development of the projected unlevered free cash flows, Maxit Capital reviewed the applicable forecasts in the Feasibility Study (the “Feasibility Study Forecasts”). Maxit Capital reviewed the relevant underlying assumptions including, but not limited to, ore tonnage mined and milled, ore grades, recovery rates, operating costs, capital expenditures and commodity prices. These assumptions were reviewed in comparison to sources considered relevant, including detailed discussions with Golden Queen’s senior management. From this review, Maxit Capital developed its own base case operating forecasts (the “Maxit Capital Operating Forecasts”), formed independently with the benefit of its understanding of the assumptions behind the Feasibility Study Forecasts. The unlevered free cash flows were then discounted to a present value using an appropriate discount rate. Finally, Maxit Capital ran sensitivity analyses on certain key input assumptions to understand the impact of a change in those assumptions and the corresponding change in value of GQ California.

Market Trading Multiples Analysis

Precious metals mining companies generally trade at a multiple to their NAV (a “P/NAV Multiple”). Once the NAV of a company has been estimated, it is adjusted to derive market trading value by applying an appropriate P/NAV multiple. In this instance, selecting a P/NAV Multiple took into careful consideration the financing nature of the Transaction, the relative size of the Transaction compared to the Company’s market capitalization and the typical discount required to complete an equity financing of this magnitude in the public or private markets.

Comparable public entities were used to assess the appropriate P/NAV MultipleSection 247, ceases to apply to GQ California’s NAV priorthe dissenter with respect to applyingthose notice shares.

(5) Unless the court orders otherwise, if a typical equity financing discount. The companies considered comparable were reviewedperson on whose behalf dissent is being exercised in termsrelation to a particular corporate action fails to ensure that every shareholder who is a registered owner of geographic location, operating characteristics, growth prospects, risk profileany of the shares beneficially owned by that person complies with subsection (1) of this section, the right of shareholders who are registered owners of shares beneficially owned by that person to dissent on behalf of that person with respect to that corporate action terminates and size. Maxit Capital identified and reviewed seven publically traded gold companiesthis Division, other than Section 247, ceases to apply to those shareholders in respect of the shares that are beneficially owned by that person.

(6) A dissenter who has complied with subsection (1) of this section may not vote, or exercise or assert any rights of a shareholder, in the construction stage or are near construction asrespect of the date hereof,notice shares, other than under this Division.

Payment for notice shares

245 (1) A company and assessed the market trading multiples for such companies.

Maxit Capital considered P/NAV to be the primary valuation multiple when applying the market trading multiples methodology. Enterprise Value per resource ounce (“EV/ounce”) was also evaluated but not relied upon given that this is crude metric which fails to take into account the quality of assets and certain other factors, including regulatory and environmental factors, whicha dissenter who has complied with Section 244(1) may affectagree on the amount of the resource that is ultimately able to be mined.

Comparable Precedent Financings Analysis

Precedent equity financing transactions were also reviewed given that the Transaction replicates a traditional equity financing and replaces the need to complete a sizeable placement in the future to fund the majority of the development of the Project. Maxit Capital reviewed 26 recent financing transactions, 11 of which were transactions in which the issuer raised gross proceeds in excess of C$50 million and 15 of which were completed by companies in the development stage, whose main commodity is gold and with a market capitalization between $75 million and $500 million at the time of the transaction. For each transaction, Maxit Capital reviewed the gross proceeds raised as a percentage of the company’s market capitalization and the offer price discount to the company’s last share price prior to announcement.

7


Application of Valuation Methodologies

1. Net Asset Value of GQ California – Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Maxit Capital relied on a DCF analysis to value the Project and estimate the NAV of GQ California. Projected unlevered after tax real cash flows were developed using the Maxit Capital Operating Forecasts. The cash flows for the Project were discounted to present value at a real discount rate of 5.0% . Maxit Capital believes that this rate is appropriate to reflect the risks associated with such assets and liabilities and is consistent with rates used by independent research analysts and industry participants in evaluating comparable assets and liabilities. Additionally, Maxit Capital used long term gold and silver prices of US$1,300 per ounce and US$21.50 per ounce, respectively to project future cash flows from the Project. These values were derived using a compilation of commodity price forecasts from over 30 independent third-party brokers. A summary of the Maxit Capital Operating Forecasts for the Project, including the resulting NPV of the Project, is shown in Table 4 below. Additional detail regarding the Maxit Capital Operating Forecasts is provided in Appendix A.

8



Table 4 – Soledad Mountain Project Life-of-Mine Operating Forecasts
Modelled
Resources
Total Ore Mined(k ton)66,808
Au Head Grade(oz/ton)0.02
Contained Au Resources(k oz)1,256
Ag Head Grade(oz/ton)0.34
Contained Ag Resources(k oz)22,931
Operating
Parameters
Estimated Remaining Mine Life(years)15
LOM Avg. Strip Ratio(W:O)1.49
Processing Rate(tons per day)14,000
LOM Au Recovery(%)80.0%
LOM Ag Recovery(%)52.5%
LOM Total Au Payable(k oz)1,004
LOM Total Ag Payable(k oz)11,949
LOM Avg. Annual Au Payable(k oz)67
LOM Avg. Annual Ag Payable(k oz)797
Operating
Costs
Mining Cost(US$/t mined)$3.85
Processing Cost(US$/t processed)$9.58
By-Product Cash Costs(US$/oz)$381
Co-Product Cash Costs(US$/oz)$532
By-Product All-In Sustaining Costs(US$/oz)$440
Capex &
Working
Capital
Development Capex(US$MM)$114.3
LOM Sustaining Capex(US$MM)$30.6
Mining Equipment(US$MM)$21.4
Working Capital(US$MM)$10.5
EconomicsAfter-tax NPV5%(US$MM)$327.2
After-Tax IRR(%)29.8%
Long-Term Gold Price(US$/oz)$1,300
Long-Term Silver Price(US$/oz)$21.50

To illustrate the effects of variations in key assumptions on the NPV of the Project, Maxit Capital performed a sensitivity analysis as outlined in Table 5 below.

9



Table 5 – Soledad Mountain After-Tax NPV Sensitivity Analysis
Impact on
VariableSensitivityNAV
($ millions)
Discount Rate+ 0.5%-$17
- 0.5%+ $18
Gold Price+/- 10%+/- $55
Silver Price+/- 10%+/- $11
Initial Capex+/- 10%+/- $8
Gold Recovery Rate+/- 10%+/- $56
Total Operating Cost+/- 10%+/- $22

2. Net Asset Value of GQ California – Street Consensus Estimates

In evaluating the NPV of the Project, Maxit Capital also reviewed estimates from independent third-party brokers. As of the date hereof, Golden Queen is covered by five brokers, of which four provided estimates for the NPV of the Project. Table 6 provides a summary of the available NPV estimates by broker.

Table 6 – Soledad Mountain NPV by Broker
Net Present Value
Broker(US$MM)
Canaccord Genuity$389
M Partners$350
Edgecrest$256
Cormark$189
Median$303
Average$296

3. Precedent Equity Financings

As previously noted, given that the Transaction contemplates the sale of less than a majority of the voting interests of GQ California and the quantity of funds financed through the Transaction is substantial relative to the market capitalization of the Company, Maxit Capital believes that it is appropriate to review recent comparable equity financing transactions to analyze the typical discount require to complete those transactions. Tables 7 and 8 summarize historical precedent equity transactions, including transactions in which the issuer raised gross proceeds in excess of C$50 million and transactions completed by gold developer companies of similar size to Golden Queen.

10



Table 7 – Precedent Equity Financings for
Gross Proceeds >C$50 Million
   % ofDiscount
  GrossMarketto Last
  ProceedsCap RaisedClose
IssuerDate(C$MM)(1)(%)(%)(2)
Altius Minerals04/28/14$6515%(9%)
Primero03/05/14$224n/a(4%)
Rubicon02/19/14$11522%(18%)
Detour02/18/14$17313%(6%)
Torex01/21/14$14418%(10%)
HudBay01/09/14$17311%(6%)
Platinum Group12/09/13$17535%(6%)
Barrick10/31/13$3,14515%(5%)
Detour05/21/13$17616%(5%)
Banro03/27/13$6817%(32%)
Total / Average $4,45818%(10%)
(1) Includes over-allotment option if exercised.
(2) Discount adjusted for warrant value where applicable.

Table 8 – Precedent Equity Financings by Gold Developers with
a Market Cap Between $75-$500 Million
   % ofDiscount
  GrossMarketto Last
  ProceedsCap RaisedClose
IssuerDate(C$MM)(1)(%)(%)(2)
Aureus Mining04/15/14$1712%(18%)
Pilot Gold03/12/14$2013%(8%)
Kaminak03/10/14$1214%(9%)
Cayden Res.03/07/14$912%(6%)
Roxgold03/03/14$2924%(11%)
True Gold01/28/14$4234%(16%)
Dalradian01/27/14$1419%(18%)
Aureus Mining10/02/13$1713%(6%)
Klondex09/30/13$1921%(4%)
Sulliden09/19/13$4013%(7%)
Carpathian08/19/13$1918%(26%)
Colossus07/23/13$3837%(16%)
Colossus05/21/13$2915%(13%)
Guyana Gold.01/30/13$10029%(8%)
Roxgold01/29/13$1012%0%
Total / Average $41519%(11%)
(1) Includes over-allotment option if exercised.
(2) Discount adjusted for warrant value where applicable.

From the above, it is evident that select companies have been able to finance small sums relative to their market capitalization. However, there is limited ability to raise a substantial amount relative to the company’s size. Moreover, doing so would require a significant discount to the current trading price before factoring in financing costs.

4. P/NAV Multiple

In order to develop a market trading value for GQ California, careful consideration had to be given not only to the trading values of comparable public entities but also to the tradingpayout value of the Company,notice shares and, in that event, the magnitudecompany must

(a)promptly pay that amount to the dissenter, or

(b)if subsection (5) of this section applies, promptly send a notice to the dissenter that the company is unable lawfully to pay dissenters for their shares.

(2) A dissenter who has not entered into an agreement with the company under subsection (1) or the company may apply to the court and the court may

(a)determine the payout value of the notice shares of those dissenters who have not entered into an agreement with the company under subsection (1), or order that the payout value of those notice shares be established by arbitration or by reference to the registrar, or a referee, of the court,

(b)join in the application each dissenter, other than a dissenter who has entered into an agreement with the company under subsection (1), who has complied with Section 244(1), and

(c)make consequential orders and give directions it considers appropriate.

(3) Promptly after a determination of the funds required relativepayout value for notice shares has been made under subsection (2) (a) of this section, the company must

(a)pay to each dissenter who has complied with Section 244(1) in relation to those notice shares, other than a dissenter who has entered into an agreement with the company under subsection (1) of this section, the payout value applicable to that dissenter's notice shares, or

(b)if subsection (5) applies, promptly send a notice to the dissenter that the company is unable lawfully to pay dissenters for their shares.

(4) If a dissenter receives a notice under subsection (1) (b) or (3) (b),

(a)the dissenter may, within 30 days after receipt, withdraw the dissenter's notice of dissent, in which case the company is deemed to consent to the withdrawal and this Division, other than Section 247, ceases to apply to the dissenter with respect to the notice shares, or

(b)if the dissenter does not withdraw the notice of dissent in accordance with paragraph (a) of this subsection, the dissenter retains a status as a claimant against the company, to be paid as soon as the company is lawfully able to do so or, in a liquidation, to be ranked subordinate to the rights of creditors of the company but in priority to its shareholders.

(5) A company must not make a payment to a dissenter under this section if there are reasonable grounds for believing that

(a)the company is insolvent, or

(b)the payment would render the company insolvent.

Loss of right to dissent

246 The right of a dissenter to dissent with respect to notice shares terminates and this Division, other than Section 247, ceases to apply to the Company’s market capitalization, the current financing environment in both the equity and debt capital markets, the transactional riskdissenter with respect to those notice shares, if, before payment is made to the Company to obtain the required funds and the capital markets profiledissenter of the Company after giving effectfull amount of money to which the Transaction, among other things.

Given that a number of the comparable companies have larger projects with the potentialdissenter is entitled under Section 245 in relation to produce more gold annually than the Project, it is reasonable to expect Golden Queen to trade at a lower P/NAV Multiple. However, Maxit Capital anticipates that by removing the existing financing overhang, Golden Queen’s share price has the potential to re-rate to a higher P/NAV Multiple pro forma the Transaction.

Table 9 summarizes a list of comparable companies that were reviewed by Maxit Capital.

11



Table 9 – Trading Comparable Analysis
      LOM Avg. 
 MarketEnterprise EV/ Au Eq.Au Eq.Annual AuStage of
 CapitalizationValueConsensusResourcesResourcesProductionFlagship
Company(US$MM)(US$MM)P/NAV(US$/oz)(MM oz)(1)(k oz)(2)Asset
Torex Gold Resources$870$5710.62x$5011.4326Construction
Romarco Minerals$472$4210.61x$874.8126Permitting
Continental Gold$363$2500.45x$337.5251Pre-Feas
Premier Gold Mines$305$2470.44x$288.9203Feasbility
Guyana Goldfields$237$1450.50x$168.9194Construction
Lydian International$157$1320.47x$304.3169Permitting
Midway Gold$141$1150.62x$215.481Financing / Construction
Median$305$2470.50x$307.5194--
Golden Queen(3)$123$1310.45x / 0.40x$393.467Financing

Note : Resources inclusive of reserves.
(1) Au Eq. figures calculated based on long-term consensus commodity price estimates.
(2) Peer production estimates based on LOM guidance where available, otherwise based on analyst estimates.
(3) GQM P/NAVs based on street consensus estimates and Maxit Capital Operating forecasts, respectively. Production based on Maxit Capital Operating Forecasts.

5. Summary of Value Analysis

Table 10 below summarizes the foregoing valuation of the Project and estimates the fair market value of GQ California as at the date hereof.

12



Table 10 – Estimated Fair Market Value of GQ California
 SoledadSelected MarketMarket Trading Value
 Mountain NPVTrading Multiple(US$MM)
Valuation Case(US$MM)LowHighLowHigh
Model NPV$3270.3x0.4x$98$131
Median Consensus NP V$3030.3x0.4x$91$121
Average   $95$126
Midpoint   $110

The market trading value of GQ California was estimated by applying a P/NAV Multiple of 0.3x to 0.4x to the Project’s estimated NPV. As previously described, the P/NAV Multiple e range was selected to account for a large number of factors, including the anticipated discount required to finance such a large sum relative to Golden Queen’s market capitalization.

Opinion of Fair Market Value

In arriving at an opinion of fair market value of the GQ California Interest, Maxit Capital has not attributed any particular weight to any specific factor but, rather, has made qualitative judgments based on experience in rendering such opinions and on circumstances then prevailing as to the significance and relevance of each factor.

Based upon and subject to the forgoing and such other factors that it considered relevant, Maxit Capital is of the opinion that, as of close of business on June 6, 2014, the fair market value of GQ California was in the range of $95 million to $126 million, concluding that the fair market value of the GQ California Interest was in the range of $48 million to $63 million.

Yours very truly,


Maxit Capital LP

13


APPENDIX A: SOLEDAD MOUNTAIN DETAILED OPERATING FORECASTS

  Total /          
YearAverage2014E2015E2016E2017E2018E2019E2020E2021E2022E2023E
Price Assumptions (US$/oz)           
         Gold (US$/oz) --$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300
         Silver (US$/oz) --$22.00$22.00$21.50$21.50$21.50$21.50$21.50$21.50
Payable Metal (k oz)           
         Gold (k oz)1,003.5--43.574.281.864.156.756.148.374.4
         Silver (k oz)11,948.6--255.4823.91,035.51,534.2948.2571.2605.0694.5
            
(US$ millions)           
Gross Revenue$1,562--$62$115$129$116$94$85$76$112
Operating Costs($640)-($0)($40)($43)($44)($48)($45)($46)($45)($46)
Capital Costs (Inc. WC)($157)($49)($84)($1)($2)($7)($0)($0)($5)($0)($2)
Free Cash Flow (Pre-Tax)$765($49)($85)$21$69$77$68$49$34$31$64
Cash Income Taxes($200)---($8)($15)($13)($7)($5)($2)($15)
Free Cash Flow (After-Tax)$565($49)($85)$21$62$63$55$42$30$28$49
            
  Total /          
YearAverage2024E2025E2026E2027E2028E2029E2030E2031E  
Price Assumptions (US$/oz)           
         Gold (US$/oz) $1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300$1,300  
         Silver (US$/oz) $21.50$21.50$21.50$21.50$21.50$21.50$21.50$21.50  
Payable Metal (k oz)           
         Gold (k oz)1,003.5113.170.595.981.463.461.917.01.1  
         Silver (k oz)11,948.61,041.71,041.6838.11,008.8743.1600.6196.710.3  
            
(US$ millions)           
Gross Revenue$1,562$169$114$143$128$98$93$26$2  
Operating Costs($640)($50)($47)($45)($42)($47)($43)($8)($0)  
Capital Costs (Inc. WC)($157)($14)($2)($0)($0)($0)$10($2)$1  
Free Cash Flow (Pre-Tax)$765$106$65$98$85$52$61$17$2  
Cash Income Taxes($200)($36)($18)($28)($24)($14)($14)($1)-  
Free Cash Flow (After-Tax)$565$71$47$69$60$38$47$16$2  

14


SCHEDULE B
FAIRNESS OPINION

 

181 Bay Street, Suite 830
Toronto, ON, M5J 2T3

June 7, 2014

Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.
6411 Imperial Avenue
West Vancouver, BC V7W 2J5

To the Special Committee of the Board of Directors:

Maxit Capital LP (“Maxit Capital”, “we” or “us”) understands that Gauss LLC (“Gauss”), a joint venture to be owned 67.5% by Leucadia National Corporation (“Leucadia”) and 32.5% by certain members of the Clay family (“Clay Family”, and together with Leucadia. the “Acquirors”) and Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd (“Golden Queen” or the “Company”) propose to effect a transaction (the “Transaction”) whereby:

i.

Golden Queen will convert its wholly-owned subsidiary that is developing the Soledad Mountain Project (the “Project”), Golden Queen Mining Company, Inc., into a California limited liability company (“GQ California”);

ii.

Gauss will acquire membership interests of GQ California representing 50% of the total membership interest to be issued and outstanding after giving effect to such issuance (the “GQ California Interest”) for US$110 million payable in cash to GQ California; and

iii.

On closing of the Transaction, Golden Queen, through a wholly-owned subsidiary (“GQ Holdco”), and Gauss will each own 50% of GQ California and will enter into a joint venture agreement (the “JV Agreement”) that will govern the management of the Project, the obligations of the parties in connection with further funding requirements and ownership of GQ California.

The terms and conditions of the Transaction are more fully described in the transaction agreement dated June 8, 2014 (the “Transaction Agreement”). We also understand that the Company’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors”) has appointed a special committee (the “Special Committee”) to consider the Transaction and to make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the Transaction.

Engagement of Maxit Capital

By letter agreement dated January 11, 2014 (the “Engagement Agreement”), the Special Committee retained Maxit Capital to act as its financial advisor in connection with a joint venture to finance the construction of the Project. Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, the Special Committee has requested that we prepare a formal valuation of the GQ California Interest (the “Valuation”) and an opinion (the “Opinion”) as to whether the consideration to be received by Golden Queen pursuant to the Transaction is fair from a financial point of view to Golden Queen.

Maxit Capital will be paid a fee for rendering this Opinion and will be paid an additional fee for the Valuation, neither of which are contingent upon the completion of the Transaction. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Maxit Capital for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and to indemnify Maxit Capital in respect of certain liabilities that might arise out of our engagement.

Credentials of Maxit Capital

Maxit Capital is an independent advisory firm with expertise in mergers and acquisitions. The Opinion expressed herein is the opinion of Maxit Capital and the form and content herein have been approved for release by its managing partners, each of whom is experienced in merger, acquisition, divestiture and valuation matters.


Independence of Maxit Capital

Neither Maxit Capital, nor any of our affiliates, is an insider, associate or affiliate (as those terms are defined in theSecurities Act (Ontario) or the rules made thereunder) of the Company, the Acquirors, or any of their respective associates or affiliates (collectively, the "Interested Parties").

Maxit Capital has not been engaged to provide any financial advisory services nor has it participated in any financings involving the Interested Parties within the past two years, other than acting as financial advisor to the Special Committee pursuant to the Engagement Agreement.

There are no other understandings, agreements or commitments between Maxit Capital andnotice shares, any of the Interested Partiesfollowing events occur:

(a)the corporate action approved or authorized, or to be approved or authorized, by the resolution or court order in respect of which the notice of dissent was sent is abandoned;

(b)the resolution in respect of which the notice of dissent was sent does not pass;

(c)the resolution in respect of which the notice of dissent was sent is revoked before the corporate action approved or authorized by that resolution is taken;

(d)the notice of dissent was sent in respect of a resolution adopting an amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation is abandoned or, by the terms of the agreement, will not proceed;

(e)the arrangement in respect of which the notice of dissent was sent is abandoned or by its terms will not proceed;

(f)a court permanently enjoins or sets aside the corporate action approved or authorized by the resolution or court order in respect of which the notice of dissent was sent;

(g)with respect to the notice shares, the dissenter consents to, or votes in favour of, the resolution in respect of which the notice of dissent was sent;

(h)the notice of dissent is withdrawn with the written consent of the company;

(i)the court determines that the dissenter is not entitled to dissent under this Division or that the dissenter is not entitled to dissent with respect to the notice shares under this Division.

Shareholders entitled to return of shares and rights

247 If, under Section 244(4) or (5), 245 (4) (a) or 246, this Division, other than this section, ceases to apply to a dissenter with respect to any current or future business dealings which would be material to the Opinion. Maxit Capital may in the ordinary course of business provide financial advisory, investment banking, or other financial services to one or more of the Interested Parties from time to time.notice shares,

Scope of Review

In connection with rendering our Opinion, we have reviewed and relied upon, among other things, the following:

i.

(a)

the draftcompany must return to the dissenter each of the Transaction Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

applicable share certificates, if any, sent under Section 244(1)(b) or, if those share certificates are unavailable, replacements for those share certificates,

ii.

(b)

the draftdissenter regains any ability lost under Section 244(6) to vote, or exercise or assert any rights of a shareholder, in respect of the Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC Amendednotice shares, and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

iii.

(c)

the draftdissenter must return any money that the company paid to the dissenter in respect of the Expense Reimbursement Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

iv.

the draft of the Equity Commitment Letter dated June 4, 2014;

v.

the draft of the Voting and Support Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

vi.

the draft of the Gauss, LLC Operating Agreement dated June 5, 2014;

vii.

certain other internal financial, operating, corporate and other information preparednotice shares under, or provided by or on behalf of Golden Queen concerning the business operations, assets, liabilities and prospects of Golden Queen and GQ California;

viii.

internal management forecasts, development and operating projections, estimates (including future estimates or mineable resources) and budgets prepared or provided by or on behalf of Golden Queen and GQ California;

ix.

discussionsin purported compliance with, management of Golden Queen relating to Golden Queen and GQ California’s current business plan, operations, financial condition, prospects and related matters;

x.

discussions with the Acquirors relating to their respective businesses, operations, financial conditions, prospects and related matters;

xi.

public information relating to the business and financial condition of Golden Queen and GQ California;

xii.

public information with respect to selected public companies we considered relevant;

xiii.

public information with respect to selected precedent transactions we considered relevant;

xiv.

various equity research reports and industry sources we considered relevant;

xv.

a certificate addressed to us, dated as of the date hereof, from two senior officers of the Company as to the completeness and accuracy of the Information (as defined below) provided to Maxit Capital in connection with Golden Queen and GQ California; and

xvi.

such other information, investigations, analyses and discussions (including discussions with the management of the Company, the Company’s external legal counsel, and other third parties) as we considered necessary or appropriate in the circumstances.

this Division.

To the best of its knowledge, Maxit Capital has not been denied access by the Company to any material information it has requested specifically regarding the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including GQ California.

B-7 

2


Assumptions and LimitationsQUESTIONS AND REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE

With the Special Committee’s permission and subject to the exercise of our professional judgment, Maxit Capital has relied upon, and has assumed the completeness, accuracy and fair presentation of all financial and other information, data, advice, opinions and representations obtained by us from public sources, or provided to us by the Company or its affiliates or advisors or otherwise obtained by us pursuant to our engagement (the “Information”). The Opinion is conditional upon such completeness, accuracy and fair presentation of the Information. We have not been requested to or attempted to verify independently the accuracy, completeness or fairness of presentation of the Information. We have not met separately with the independent auditors of the Company in connection with preparing this Opinion and with the Special Committee’s permission, we have assumed the accuracy and fair presentation of, and relied upon, the audited financial statements of the Company and the reports of the auditors thereon and the interim unaudited financial statements of the Company.

With respect to the Information provided to us concerning the Company that constitute forecasts, projections, estimates or budgets and relied upon in our financial analyses, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the most reasonable assumptions, estimates and judgments of management of the Company, having regard to the Company’s business, plans, financial condition and prospects.

The Company has represented to us, in a certificate of two senior officers of the Company dated the date hereof, among other things, that the Information provided to us by or on behalf of the Company, including the written information and discussions concerning the Company referred to above under the heading “Scope of Review”, are complete and correct at the date the Information was provided to us and that, since the date on which the Information was provided to us, there has been no material change, financial or otherwise, in the financial condition, assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise), business, operations or prospects of the Company or any of its affiliates and no material change has occurred in the Information or any part thereof which would have or which would reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the Opinion.

We are not legal, tax or accounting experts and we express no opinion concerning any legal, tax or accounting matters concerning the Transaction or the sufficiency of this letter for your purposes. The Opinion is rendered on the basis of securities markets, economic and general business and financial conditions prevailing as at the close of business on June 5, 2014 and the conditions and prospects, financial and otherwise, of the Company and the Acquirors as they are reflected in the Information and as they were represented to us in our discussions with management of the Company and its affiliates and advisors. In our analyses and in connection with the preparation of our Opinion, we made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, markets and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of any party involved in the Transaction.

The Opinion is being provided to the Special Committee for its exclusive use only in considering the Transaction and may not be published, disclosed to any other person, relied upon by any other person, or used for any other purpose, without the prior written consent of Maxit Capital. Our Opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company with respect to the Transaction.

Maxit Capital believes that its financial analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and the factors considered by it, without considering all factors and analyses together, could create a misleading view of the process underlying the Opinion. The preparation of an opinion is complex and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description and any attempt to carry out such could lead to undue emphasis on any particular factor or analysis.

The Opinion is given as of the date hereof and, although we reserve the right to change or withdraw the Opinion if we learn that any of the information that we relied upon in preparing the Opinion was inaccurate, incomplete or misleading in any material respect, we disclaim any obligation to change or withdraw the Opinion, to advise any person of any change that may come to our attention or to update the Opinion after the date of this Opinion.

3


Opinion

Based upon and subject to the foregoing and such other matters as we considered relevant, it is our opinion, as of the date hereof, that the consideration to be received by Golden Queen pursuant to the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to Golden Queen.

Yours very truly,


Maxit Capital LP

4


QUESTIONS MAY BE DIRECTED TO THE PROXY SOLICITOR
 
NORTH AMERICAN TOLL-FREE

 

North American Toll Free

1-877-452-7184
Banks Brokers or

Collect Calls: Calls Outside North America

416-304-0211

Email:assistance@laurelhill.com